Managing Unforeseen Site Conditions
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 113, Issue 2
Abstract
Owners often attempt to use construction contract language to apportion responsibility for unforeseen site conditions among themselves, contractors, and designers. The legal merits and limitations of alternate contract clauses and contract forms have received considerable attention in the literature. Here, using the data from several recent studies, it is shown that the actual contract language used is largely irrelevant to the actual costs borne by owners and contractors. More importantly, the management techniques used determine the ultimate cost to all participants. Two management techniques particularly relevant to unforeseen site conditions are the use of interpretive reports and the early resolution of claims. These techniques, their effectiveness, and the overall limitations of legalistic approaches to the management of unforeseen site conditions are discussed in detail.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Currie, A. O., Ansley, R. B., Jr., Smith, K. P., and Abernathy, T. E., IV (1971). “Differing site (changed) conditions.” The Government Contractor Briefing Papers, 71‐5, Federal Publ. Inc., Washington, D.C.
2.
Diekmann, J. E., and Nelson, M. C. (1985). “Construction claims: frequency and severity.” J. Const. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 111(1), 74–81.
3.
Government Services Admin. (n.d.) GSA standard form 23‐A; also known as the federal C‐2 contract provisions.
4.
Hester, W. T. (1980). Prevention, management and resolution of construction contractor claims on clean water grant projects, unpublished; report prepared for Calif. State Water Resour. Control Board, Div. Water Quality.
5.
Hester, W. T., Graves, J., Peterson, L., and Chapel, H. (1982). Management of Environmental Protection Agency Projects by Local Grantees. EPA Grant No. T‐901266‐01, unpublished; report prepared for U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
6.
Ibbs, C. W., Jr. (1985). “Project specification practices and problems.” J. Const. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 111(2), 157–172.
7.
Ibbs, C. W., Back, W. E., Kim, J. J., Wall, D. E., De La Garza, J. M., Hassanein, M. A., Schran, S. M., and Twardock, R. K. (1986). Determining the impact of various construction contract types and clauses on project performance. UILU‐ENG‐86‐2004, 2 vol., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Ill.
8.
McLure, G. H. (1984). “Differing site conditions: evaluating the material difference.” Public contract law J., 15(1), 139–176.
9.
Merrill, W. E. (1982). Air force construction contract disputes: An analysis of armed services board of contract appeals cases to identify dispute types and causes. Air Force Inst. Tech., School of Systems and Logistics, Ohio.
10.
Pierce, J. D., Jr. (1976). Construction contracts. L. R. Oliensis, Ed., Practising Law Inst., New York, N.Y.
11.
Richter, I., and Mitchell, R. S. (1982). Handbook of construction law and claims. Reston Publ. Co., Inc., Reston, Va., 146–162.
12.
Standard specification for highway construction. (1984). Oregon Dept. of Transp., Highway Div., Salem, Oreg.
13.
Stubbs, J. D. (1982–1983). “Differing site conditions: Contractors' reliance on government test boring information.” The air force law review, 23(1), 147–155.
14.
Sweet, J. (1977). Legal aspects of architecture, engineering and the construction process. 2nd ed., West Publ. Co., St. Paul, Minn., 369–387.
15.
Thomas, H. R., Jr., Hester, W. T., Hunter, J. M., Willenbrock, J. H., and Logan, P. A. (1985). Highway construction contract claims: Causes and resolution practices. report no. FHWA‐TS‐85‐215, unpublished; report prepared for Federal Highway Admin., Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
16.
U.S. Natl. Committee on Tunneling Tech., Better contracting for underground construction. (1974). Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, D.C., pp. 17, 18.
17.
U.S. Natl. Committee on Tunneling Tech., Site investigations for underground projects. (1984). 2 vols., Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, D.C.
18.
Walstead, P. J., and Emerson, M. W. C. (1984). Subsurface conditions. Federal Publ. Inc., Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 113 • Issue 2 • June 1987
Pages: 273 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1987
Published in print: Jun 1987
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.