A Hierarchical Fuzzy Expert System for Contractor Prequalification
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
The selection of qualified contractors for construction projects plays a pivotal role in ensuring the quality of project delivery, and as such, represents a critical decision for project owners. For an informed selection, multiple criteria, such as cost, quality, experience, safety records, and past performance, need to be considered. However, due to the multiple criteria for contractor prequalification, each with varying degrees of relative importance that are difficult to measure using quantitative data, the selection process can prove challenging for owners. The objective of this paper is to propose a model for contractor prequalification that combines the use of a fuzzy expert system and hierarchical diagramming. To achieve this aim, we first utilized various types of questionnaires to gather the main criteria, relevant subcriteria, and initial fuzzy numbers. Subsequently, we developed a fuzzy expert system for each subcriterion and the main system. Finally, by exploring different t-norms, s-norms, defuzzification types, and tuning membership functions, we selected the best type of fuzzy system for each criterion. MATLAB software was employed for coding purposes in this study. In order to validate the model’s efficacy, a comparative analysis was conducted between the scores assigned to individual contractors as generated by the fuzzy logic model, and the factual scores allocated to the respective contractors. The observed discrepancy in the model’s accuracy ranged between 10% and 15% which means an 85% to 90% similarity between the model’s evaluation and actual scoring.
Practical Applications
Selecting competent contractors for construction projects is crucial to ensuring project quality and success. The paper introduces a groundbreaking approach to simplify this process. Traditionally complex due to diverse criteria and their varying significance, contractor selection is now more accessible. In simple words, this research introduces a smart method for choosing the right contractors. By combining a fuzzy expert system and a clear hierarchy, the study makes it easier for project owners to pick the best team. Imagine having a tool that considers multiple factors, even those that are not easily measured, to help you choose contractors wisely. This approach, developed using various questionnaires and advanced algorithms, empowers project owners to make more informed decisions. In essence, this research streamlines contractor selection, ensuring projects have the best possible chance for success.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All survey data with anonymous respondents as well as the statistical analysis of this research are available from the corresponding author by request.
References
Works Cited
Acheamfour, V. K., E. Kissi, and T. Adjei-Kumi. 2019. “Ascertaining the impact of contractors pre-qualification criteria on project success criteria.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (4): 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2018-0110.
Afshar, M. R., Y. Alipouri, M. H. Sebt, and W. T. Chan. 2017. “A type-2 fuzzy set model for contractor prequalification.” Autom. Constr. 84: 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.10.003.
Al-sinaidi, A. 2002. “Computation of construction contractor capability.” Ph.D. thesis, College of Engineering and Science, Univ. of Florida Institute of Technology.
Awad, A., and A. R. Fayek. 2010. “Developing a framework for construction contractor qualification for surety bonding.” In Construction research congress 2010: Innovation for reshaping construction practice. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Awad, A., and A. R. Fayek. 2012. “Adaptive learning of contractor default prediction model for surety bonding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (6): 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000639.
Cheaitou, A., R. Larbi, and B. Al Housani. 2018. “Decision making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations.” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci. 68 (Dec): 100620.
Chow, L. K., and S. T. Ng. 2007. “A fuzzy gap analysis model for evaluating the performance of engineering consultants.” Autom. Constr. 16 (4): 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.07.010.
El-Abbasy, M. S., T. Zayed, M. Ahmed, H. Alzraiee, and M. Abouhamad. 2013. “Contractor selection model for highway projects using integrated simulation and analytic network process.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (7): 755–767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000647.
El-Sawalhi, N., D. Eaton, and R. Rustom. 2007. “Contractor pre-qualification model: State-of-the-art.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (5): 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.011.
El-Sayegh, S. M., M. Basamji, A. Haj Ahmad, and N. Zarif. 2019. “Key contractor selection criteria for green construction projects in the UAE.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 21 (12): 1240–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1610545.
Fong, P. S. W., and S. K. Y. Choi. 2000. “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 18 (5): 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900407356.
Hatush, Z., and M. Skitmore. 1997. “Evaluating contractor prequalification data: Selection criteria and project success factors.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 15 (2): 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199700000002.
Holt, G. D., P. O. Olomolaiye, and F. C. Harris. 1994. “Evaluating prequalification criteria in contractor selection.” Build. Environ. 29 (4): 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(94)90003-5.
Hosseini Nasab, H., and M. Mirghani Ghamsarian. 2015. “A fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making model for contractor prequalification.” J. Decis. Syst. 24 (4): 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2015.1081048.
Jaskowski, P., S. Biruk, and R. Bucon. 2010. “Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment.” Autom. Constr. 19 (2): 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.12.014.
Jayakrishna, K., S. Vinodh, and S. Anish. 2016. “A graph theory approach to measure the performance of sustainability enablers in a manufacturing organization.” Int. J. Sustainable Eng. 9 (1): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2015.1050970.
Juan, Y. K., Y. H. Perng, D. Castro-Lacouture, and K. S. Lu. 2009. “Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach.” Autom. Constr. 18 (2): 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.06.001.
Khosrowshahi, F. 1999. “Neural network model for contractors’ prequalification for local authority projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 6 (3): 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021121.
Lam, K. C., T. Hu, S. Thomas Ng, M. Skitmore, and S. O. Cheung. 2001. “A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor prequalification.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 19 (2): 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190150505108.
Lam, K. C., E. Palaneeswaran, and C. Y. Yu. 2009. “A support vector machine model for contractor prequalification.” Autom. Constr. 18 (3): 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.007.
Li, Y., X. Nie, and S. Chen. 2007. “Fuzzy approach to prequalifying construction contractors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:1(40).
Liang, R., Z. Sheng, and X. Wang. 2018. “Methods dealing with complexity in selecting joint venture contractors for large-scale infrastructure projects.” Complexity 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8705134.
Marsh, K., and A. R. Fayek. 2010. “SuretyAssist: Fuzzy expert system to assist surety underwriters in evaluating construction contractors for bonding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (11): 1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000224.
Nieto-Morote, A., and F. Ruz-Vila. 2012. “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for construction contractor prequalification.” Autom. Constr. 25 (Mar): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.004.
Olaniran, O. J. 2015. “The effects of cost-based contractor selection on construction project performance.” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 20 (3): 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-06-2014-0008.
Palaneeswaran, E., and M. Kumaraswamy. 2001. “Recent advances and proposed improvements in contractor prequalification methodologies.” Build. Environ. 36 (1): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00069-4.
Plebankiewicz, E. 2009. “Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 15 (4): 377–385. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.377-385.
Plebankiewicz, E. 2012. “A fuzzy sets based contractor prequalification procedure.” Autom. Constr. 22 (Jun): 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.003.
Rao, M. K., V. S. S. Kumar, and P. R. Kumar. 2018. “Optimal contractor selection in construction industry: The fuzzy way.” J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 99 (1): 67–78.
Rashidi, A., F. Jazebi, and I. Brilakis. 2010. “Neurofuzzy genetic system for selection of construction project managers.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (1): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000200.
Russell, J. S., D. E. Hancher, and M. J. Skibniewski. 1992. “Contractor prequalification data for construction owners.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 10 (2): 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199200000012.
Russell, J. S., and M. J. Skibniewski. 1988. “Decision criteria in contractor prequalification.” J. Manage. Eng. 4 (2): 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:2(148).
Safa, M., A. Shahi, C. T. Haas, D. Fiander-McCann, M. Safa, K. Hipel, and S. MacGillivray. 2015. “Competitive intelligence (CI) for evaluation of construction contractors.” Autom. Constr. 59 (Mar): 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.009.
Samarghandi, H., S. Mousavi, P. Taabayan, A. Mir Hashemi, and K. Willoughby. 2016. “Studying the reasons for delay and cost overrun in construction projects: The case of Iran.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 21 (1): 51–84. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2016.21.1.4.
Senthil, S., B. Srirangacharyulu, and A. Ramesh. 2014. “A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics.” Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (1): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.010.
Singh, D., and R. L. Tiong. 2005. “A fuzzy decision framework for contractor selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (1): 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(62).
Singh, D., and R. L. Tiong. 2006. “Contractor selection criteria: Investigation of opinions of Singapore construction practitioners.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (9): 998–1008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:9(998).
Xia, B., Q. Chen, Y. Xu, M. Li, and X. Jin. 2014a. “Design-build contractor selection for public sustainable buildings.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 04014070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000295.
Xia, B., M. Skitmore, J. Zuo, Z. Zhao, and M. Nepal. 2014b. “Defining sustainability requirements for design-build (DB) contractor selection in public sector projects.” In Proc., 18th Int. Symp. on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 59–66. Berlin: Springer.
Yiu, C. Y., S. M. Lo, S. T. Ng, and M. M. Ng. 2002. “Contractor selection for small building works in Hong Kong.” Struct. Surv. 20 (4): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800210445690.
Zavadskas, E. K., T. Vilutiene, Z. Turskis, and J. Tamosaitiene. 2010. “Contractor selection for construction works by applying SAW-G and TOPSIS grey techniques.” J. Bus. Econ. Manage. 11 (1): 34–55. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.03.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16 • Issue 3 • August 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 18, 2023
Accepted: Jan 29, 2024
Published online: May 15, 2024
Published in print: Aug 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Oct 15, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning
- Business management
- Computer programming
- Computing in civil engineering
- Construction engineering
- Construction management
- Contracts and subcontracts
- Engineering fundamentals
- Expert systems
- Fuzzy logic
- Model accuracy
- Models (by type)
- Owners
- Personnel (type)
- Personnel management
- Practice and Profession
- Project management
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.