Some features of the ASCE Shopping cart and login features of the website will be down for maintenance on Sunday, June 16th, 2024, beginning at 12:00 A.M. ET and ending at 6:00 A.M. ET. During this time if you need immediate assistance at 1-800-548-2723 or [email protected].

Technical Papers
Apr 2, 2024

Effects of Antisymmetric Load Component on Collapse of Concrete Box-Girder Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 6

Abstract

Space truss analogy and collapse mechanisms are the theoretical methods which are available at present to predict the collapse loads of single-cell concrete box-girder bridges. It is observed that of the two formulations, the one based on a collapse mechanism is found to be more versatile and better suited to box sections. The eccentric load acting on the top flange of a box girder may be resolved to symmetric and antisymmetric components. The antisymmetric component may again be resolved as torsion component and distortion component. However, no researcher has extended this concept to determine an equation for the estimation of collapse load. The present study proposes a theory for calculating the collapse load of single-cell concrete box-girder bridges considering pure torsion and distortion mechanisms. The box girder is treated as a folded plate structure subjected to the vertical and horizontal components of the load in the plane of each plate. It is assumed that plastic hinges are developed at the four corners of the box girder for distortion mechanism and the cross section causes pure twisting without distortion for torsion mechanism. The proposed pure torsion and distortion mechanisms are incorporated in the existing collapse mechanism method and the modified method is validated with the experimental results available in the literature.

Practical Applications

Estimation of the ultimate load carrying capacity of existing concrete box-girder bridges is discussed in this paper. Among the various simplified theoretical models available to predict the collapse load of single-cell concrete box-girder bridges, the collapse mechanisms theory yields the most accurate results according to the existing literature. To the existing, pure bending and distortion-bending mechanisms, two more mechanisms (torsion and distortion mechanisms) are proposed in the current paper to make the collapse mechanisms theory more conclusive. With the introduction of these two new mechanisms, the collapse load of existing single-cell concrete box-girder bridges subjected to unsymmetrical loading can be predicted by taking the lowest value obtained from: (i) pure bending mechanism; (ii) distortion-bending mechanism; (iii) torsion mechanism; and (iv) distortion mechanism. This will help the bridge engineers to ascertain the functioning of existing as well as new concrete box-girder bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during this study appear in the published article.

References

Benson, S., A. AbuBakar, and R. S. Dow. 2013. “A comparison of computational methods to predict the progressive collapse behaviour of a damaged box girder.” Eng. Struct. 48: 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.031.
Bernardo, L. F. A., and S. M. R. Lopes. 2008. “Behaviour of concrete beams under torsion: NSC plain and hollow beams.” Mater. Struct. 41 (6): 1143–1167. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9315-0.
Chai, H. K., A. A. Majeed, and A. A. Allawi. 2015. “Torsional analysis of multi-cell concrete box girders strengthened with CFRP using a modified softened truss model.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (8): B4014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000621.
Chithra, J. 2022. “Investigations on the behaviour of concrete box girder bridges.” Ph.D thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology.
Chithra, J., P. Nagarajan, and A. S. Sajith. 2022. “Investigations in twin-cell box girder bridges subjected to combined effects of bending and torsion.” Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7: 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00719-2.
Danesi, R. F., and A. D. Edwards. 1982. “Bending, torsion and distortion of prestressed concrete box beams of deformable cross-section: A comparison of experimental and theoretical results.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 73 (4): 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1982.1615.
Danesi, R. F., and A. D. Edwards. 1983. “The behavior up to failure of prestressed concrete box-beams of deformable cross-section subjected to eccentric load.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 75 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1983.1552.
Domaneschi, M., C. Pellecchia, E. De Iuliis, G. P. Cimellaro, M. Morgese, A. A. Khalil, and F. Ansari. 2020. “Collapse analysis of the polcevera viaduct by the applied element method.” Eng. Struct. 214: 11065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110659.
Knittel, G. 1965. “The analysis of thin-walled box-girders of constant symmetrical cross-section.” Beton-und Stahlbetonbau 60 (9): 205–211.
Kupfer, H. 1969. “Box beams with elastically stiffened cross-section under line and point loads.” In Methods of analysis and design of concrete box beams with side cantilevers, 251–263. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn.
Kurian, B., and D. Menon. 2004. “Literature review of post-cracking and ultimate load behaviour of concrete box-girder bridges.” Bridge Struct. Eng. 34: 7–18.
Kurian, B., and D. Menon. 2007. “Estimation of collapse load of single cell concrete Box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (4): 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:4(518).
Lampert, P., and B. Thurlimann. 1971. “Ultimate strength and design of reinforced concrete beams in torsion and bending.” Int. Assoc. Bridge Struct. Eng. 31: 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5954-7_1.
Li, S., Z. Hu, and S. Benson. 2020. “Progressive collapse analysis of ship hull girders subjected to extreme cyclic bending.” Mar. Struct. 73: 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102803.
Li, S., Z. Q. Hu, and S. D. Benson. 2019. “A cyclic progressive collapse method to predict the bending response of a ship hull girder.” Trends Anal. Des. Mar. Struct. 978: 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298875-16.
Mohamed, H. A., M. M. Husain, and A. M. Aboraya. 2020. “Progressive collapse of RC box girder bridges due to seismic actions.” Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1919683.
Nie, J.-G., and L. Zhu. 2014. “Beam-truss model of steel-concrete composite box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (7): 04014023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000592.
Nielsen, M. P. 1999. Limit analysis and concrete plasticity. Washington, DC: CRC Press.
Pillai, S. U., and D. Menon. 2003. Reinforced concrete design. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
Rasmussen, L. J., and G. Baker. 1998. “Stress resultant plasticity model for the analysis of reinforced concrete shell and box structures.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 128 (2): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.1998.30124.
Rasmussen, L. J., and G. Baker. 1999. “Large scale experimental investigation of deformable RC box-sections.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (3): 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:3(227).
Sennah, K. M., and J. B. Kennedy. 2001. “State-of-the-art in design of curved box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (3): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:3(159).
Shi, X., Z. Cao, H. Ma, and X. Ruan. 2018. “Failure analysis on a curved girder bridge collapse under eccentric heavy vehicles using explicit finite element method: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (3): 05018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001201.
Spence, R. J. S., and C. T. Morley. 1975. “The strength of single-cell concrete box-girders of deformable cross-sections.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 59 (4): 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1975.3637.
Swann, R. A. 1972. A feature survey of concrete spine-beam bridges. Tech. Rep. 42-469. London: Cement and Concrete Association,.
Vlazov, V. Z. 1965. Thin-walled elastic beams, OTS61-11400. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Xu, Y., G. Xu, S. Xue, J. Wang, and Y. Li. 2022. “Failure mechanism and vulnerability assessment of coastal box-girder bridge with laminated rubber bearings under extreme waves.” Ocean Eng. 266: 112834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112834.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 29Issue 6June 2024

History

Received: May 4, 2023
Accepted: Jan 10, 2024
Published online: Apr 2, 2024
Published in print: Jun 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Sep 2, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Muthoot Institute of Technology and Science, Ernakulam 682308, Kerala, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7821-2906. Email: [email protected]
Devdas Menon [email protected]
Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Muthoot Institute of Technology and Science, Ernakulam 682308, Kerala, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5191-1320. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share