Open access
Technical Breakthrough Abstracts
Mar 24, 2022

Validating a Unified Effective Stress Equation for Soil

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148, Issue 6
Effective stress σ is the stress acting on a soil’s skeleton due to the total stress σ, pore water pressure (Terzaghi 1943), interparticle capillary stress (Bishop 1959), and adsorptive stress (Lu and Likos 2006). A general effective stress is proposed (Lu and Likos 2006), using the suction stress σs as a function of water content w, including capillary stress σcaps(w) and adsorptive stress σadss(w)
σ=σσs(w)=σσcaps(w)σadss(w)
(1)
An explicit form of suction stress and its dependence on soil water content was proposed and experimentally validated (Lu et al. 2010) for all types of soils under matric suction <1.5  MPa
σs(w)=1αSWRwwrwswr[(wwrwswr)nSWR/(1nSWR)1]1/nSWR
(2)
where wr = residual water content for adsorption; ws = saturated water content; αSWR is related to the inverse of the air-entry pressure; and nSWR is related to the pore size distribution for soil water retention (SWR). Recently, Lu and Zhang (2019) showed that defining matric suction ψm as the air pressure ua and pore water pressure uw difference (i.e., uauw) is incomplete, and a general definition including both adsorption and capillarity is
ψm(w)=uauw(w,x)ψads(x)
(3)
where x = statistical distance to a particle surface; and ψads(w) = soil sorptive potential (SSP). In light of the general matric suction and SSP concepts, suction stress equations more general than Eq. (2) have been proposed under a full range of water content [Fig. 1(a)] (Zhang and Lu 2020)
σcaps(w)=w2αSSws[1+erf(4wwamaxSSwamaxSS)][(wws)nSS/(1nSS)1]1/nSS
(4a)
σadss(w)=12σdrys[1erf(βwwamaxSSwamaxSS)]
(4b)
where αSS is related to the inverse of the average capillary suction stress; nSS is related to the pore size distribution; wamaxSS is related to maximum adsorptive water content; σdrys = suction stress at the oven-dry state; and β = strength of the adsorptive suction stress. Capillary suction stress [Eq. (4a) and Fig. 1(a)] is due to capillary pressure (uauw) and varies nonmonotonically with water content, whereas adsorptive suction stress [Eq. (4b) and Fig. 1(a)] is due to SSP and varies monotonically at low water content.
Fig. 1. Unified suction stress by Eqs. (4a) and (4b): (a) equations and parameters; and (b) experimental validation for sandy (ZzS: Zhengzhou sand), silty (SmC: Sanmenxia silt), and clayey (NmC: Ningming expansive clay) soils.

Experimental Validation

The experimental data of suction stress from the drying cake technique (Dong and Lu 2017) for various types of soils [Fig. 1(b)] show that Eq. (4) can well represent suction stress variations with soil types and water content, confirming the validity and generality of the effective stress Eqs. (1) and (4) under all saturation conditions.

Significance

Eq. (4) can be reduced to the Lu et al.’s (2010) Eq. (2) when capillarity dominates the SWR, and Eqs. (1) and (4) can be reduced to the Bishop’s effective stress when capillarity is the sole SWR mechanism and can further be reduced to the Terzaghi’s effective stress when soil is saturated (Zhang and Lu 2020).
With the general effective stress described by Eqs. (1) and (4), all classical solutions of effective stress for various foundation problems such as limit-state equilibrium in slopes, and lateral earth pressure, retain the same mathematical forms, and thus may be readily implemented for design and analysis of foundation soil under both saturated and unsaturated conditions.

References

Bishop, A. W. 1959. “The principle of effective stress.” Tek. Ukebl. 106 (39): 849–863.
Dong, Y., and N. Lu. 2017. “Measurement of suction-stress characteristic curve under drying and wetting conditions.” Geotech. Testing J. 40 (1): 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160058.
Lu, N., J. Godt, and D. Wu. 2010. “A closed-form equation for effective stress in variably saturated soil.” Water Resour. Res. 46 (5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008646.
Lu, N., and W. J. Likos. 2006. “Suction stress characteristic curve for unsaturated soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (2): 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(131).
Lu, N., and C. Zhang. 2019. “Soil sorptive potential: Concept, theory, and verification.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 145 (4): 04019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002025.
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. New York: Wiley.
Zhang, C., and N. Lu. 2020. “Unified effective stress equation for soil.” J. Eng. Mech. 146 (2): 04019135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001718.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 148Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Dec 1, 2021
Accepted: Dec 15, 2021
Published online: Mar 24, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 24, 2022

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1753-129X. Email: [email protected]
Yi Dong, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • A poroelasticity theory for soil incorporating adsorption and capillarity, Géotechnique, 10.1680/jgeot.22.00097, (1-18), (2022).

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share