Free access
Research Article
Dec 14, 2021

Evaluation of Testing Uncertainties for the Impact Resistance of Machine Guards

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 2

Abstract

Machine guards provide protection against the ejection of parts during operation, such as chips or workpiece fragments. They are considered safe if the impact resistance is at least as high as the resulting projectile energy in the worst case of damage. To protect the machine operator, the impact resistance of machine guards is determined according to ISO standards. The bisection method can be used to determine the impact resistance through impact tests. However, this method is inaccurate for a small number of impact tests and does not indicate uncertainties in the determination. Moreover, the result of testing is validated in different ways depending on the standard utilized for testing. Relevant uncertainties affecting impact testing and a new probabilistic approach for assessing the impact resistance using the Recht and Ipson equation are presented. With multiple impact tests at different initial velocities a Recht and Ipson best-fit curve and a confidence interval for a ballistic limit can be obtained, which is used to determine the impact resistance by defining a velocity reduction coefficient. This method can be applied to any machine guard made of ductile material. This paper validates the Recht and Ipson method by performing impact tests with a standardized 2.5 kg projectile on polycarbonate sheets of different thicknesses. Determination of the ballistic limit showed good agreement with experimental results. With the ballistic limits, the velocity reduction coefficients have been found to determine the impact resistances. Therefore, an alternative method for standardized tests to determine the impact resistance was found. This article is available in the ASME Digital Collection at https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052995.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
Volume 8Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: May 28, 2021
Revision received: Nov 2, 2021
Published online: Dec 14, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 63, Perugia 06125, Italy e-mail: [email protected]
Eckart Uhlmann
Institute for Machine Tools and Factory Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Pascalstraße 8 – 9, Berlin 10587, Germany
Robert Hörl
Institute for Machine Tools and Factory Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Pascalstraße 8 – 9, Berlin 10587, Germany
Institute for Machine Tools and Factory Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Pascalstraße 8 – 9, Berlin 10587, Germany e-mail: [email protected]
Giuseppe Gigliotti
Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 63, Perugia 06125, Italy
Alessandro Stecconi [email protected]
Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Via G. Duranti 63, Perugia 06125, Italy e-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share