Technical Papers
Aug 22, 2024

Strengthening Project Development in Developing Countries: Investigating the Infrastructure Enabling Environment through a Systems Analysis

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 30, Issue 4

Abstract

Globally, the current stock of infrastructure is not sufficient to meet the rising demand for infrastructure services. Billions of people around the world lack access to essential infrastructure services, especially in developing countries. Infrastructure project development is an inherently complex endeavor. The ability of governments to prepare and deliver quality infrastructure projects that meet societal need hinges on the strength of their infrastructure enabling environments: the actors, resources, and conditions that facilitate the development of quality infrastructure projects. Governments in developing countries often are burdened by weak enabling environments, but it is not clear how this can be remedied to improve project development. The complexity of project development necessitates a systems perspective. This paper advocates for a systems approach to address project development challenges and strengthen the enabling environment. A systems analysis was conducted to map the infrastructure enabling environment, identify key relationships and causal loops within this system, and uncover leverage points to improve project development. A systems stakeholder map and causal loop diagram were employed for this investigation, using the INABLE Framework for the infrastructure enabling environment as a reference. The systems stakeholder map highlights the central role of dedicated government institutions, the need for trust between stakeholders, and the role of power dynamics within these relationships. Similarly, the causal loop diagram demonstrates the limits of debt financing, the potential of quick-win projects and success stories to drive investor confidence, the trade-offs between affordability and bankability, and the power of data and information to drive decision-making. Using a case study application in Saint Lucia, the systems analysis is grounded in practical examples of system dynamics within the enabling environment. The case study highlights the role of legislation and institutional structures, and the impact of external technical assistance from development financiers and civil society in supporting the enabling environment.

Practical Applications

Sustainable development is rooted in meeting present needs without compromising the ability to do so in the future. It is rooted in preserving the natural systems that enable human life, while balancing the needs of society and economy, and ensuring quality of life for all. Infrastructure is essential to achieve sustainable development. It is foundational to human life. However, the infrastructure currently in place is not sufficient to meet the needs of growing populations. This paper investigated the systems that enable infrastructure development in developing countries to understand the challenges that prevent infrastructure from being built and to uncover potential solutions to address these challenges. The primary audience of this research is developing-country government agencies that are responsible for infrastructure development, and the organizations that support them. In North America, these are engineering consulting firms, federal government agencies, international organizations, and not-for-profit organizations that support infrastructure project development in developing countries. This work seeks solutions to the challenges these organizations and practitioners face in developing infrastructure projects. The paper presents a novel framework which provides common language that can be used to understand the enabling environment for infrastructure, a term which is not well defined or understood in this field. By applying the framework to a systems analysis and case study in Saint Lucia, the paper produced several findings, insights, and recommendations for government and development organizations to strengthen infrastructure development in their countries.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, specifically interview transcripts of consenting participants.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the interview participants and their affiliated organizations, whose insights added great texture to this research. Special thanks are given to the representatives from the Government of Saint Lucia, whose insights formed the backbone of the NIPP case study.

References

Adeoti, T., D. Boroto, R. Haggis, S. Thacker, F. Felix, G. Edwin, and H. Wells. 2021. Saint Lucia: National infrastructure financing strategy. Copenhagen, Denmark: United Nations Office for Project Services.
Adshead, D., et al. 2020. Saint Lucia: National infrastructure assessment. Copenhagen, Denmark: United Nations Office for Project Services.
Boroto, D. 2022. “Investigating the infrastructure enabling environment to strengthen project development.” Ph.D. dissertation, Centre for Sustainable Development, Univ. of Cambridge.
Bull, M., and J. B. Carmona. n.d. Bankability in highway PPP projects. Washington, DC: Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.
Changole, A. 2023. “The rippling costs of Ghana’s overspending.” Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-03-17/the-rippling-costs-of-ghana-s-overspending.
Chennells, M., T. Chaponda, and M. Nikore. 2014. Effective project preparation for Africa’s infrastructure development. Cape Town, South Africa: Infrastructure Consortium for Africa.
CoST. 2018 “First assurance report on public infrastructure projects: Afghanistan.” Accessed November 1, 2019. https://infrastructuretransparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CoST-Afghanistan-2nd-Assurance-Report-2019-English.pdf.
CoST. 2019 “The second assurance report transparency and accountability in public infrastructure projects: Afghanistan.” Accessed November 1, 2019. https://infrastructuretransparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CoST-Afghanistan-2nd-Assurance-Report-2019-English.pdf.
Crowe, S., K. Cresswell, A. Robertson, G. Hurby, A. Avery, and A. Sheikh. 2011. “The case study approach.” BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 11 (1): 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2022. “The Infrascope archives 2009-19: Measuring the enabling environment for public-private partnerships in infrastructure.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://infrascope.eiu.com/.
Fay, M., and J. Rozenberg. 2019. “Beyond the gap: How countries can afford the infrastructure they need while protecting the planet.” Accessed July 30, 2022. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/31291.
FSG. 2015. Guide to actor mapping. Boston: FSG.
G20 IWG (Infrastructure Working Group). 2018. “G20 principles for the infrastructure project preparation phase prepared by the infrastructure working group.” Accessed July 26, 2022. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2018/principles_for_infrastructure_project_preparation.pdf.
GI Hub. 2019a. “Project preparation—Financing project preparation: How can governments effectively utilise project preparation financing sources?’, Global infrastructure hub, 19 March.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://www.gihub.org/articles/financing-project-preparation-governments-effectively-utilise-financing/.
GI Hub. 2019b. “Leading practices in governmental processes facilitating infrastructure project preparation a practical guide for governments, informed by a country-lens review of leading practices.” Accessed July 16, 2022. https://cdn.gihub.org/umbraco/media/2344/gih_project-preparation_full-document_final_art_web.pdf.
GI Hub. 2022a. “Affordability and optimising finance.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://inclusiveinfra.gihub.org/action-areas/affordability-and-optimising-finance/.
GI Hub. 2022b. “InfraCompass.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://infracompass.gihub.org/.
GI Hub. 2022c. “Infrastructure monitor 2022: Global trends in private investment in infrastructure.” Accessed June 5, 2023. https://cdn.gihub.org/umbraco/media/5171/global-infrastructure-hub_2022-infrastructure-monitor-report-plus-esg-section_fa_2203.pdf.
GI Hub. 2023. “Explore our work.” Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.gihub.org/explore-our-work/.
Global Infrastructure Facility. 2022. “About GIF.” Accessed July 30, 2022. https://www.globalinfrafacility.org/about-gif.
GoSL (Government of Saint Lucia). 2019. “NIPP unit launched.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://www.govt.lc/news/nipp-unit-launched.
Green, D. 2016. How change happens. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hall, J. W., S. Thacker, M. C. Ives, Y. Cao, M. Chaudry, S. P. Blainey, and E. J. Oughton. 2017. “Strategic analysis of the future of national infrastructure.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Civ. Eng. 170 (1): 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1680/jcien.16.00018.
Haraldsson, H. 2000. Introduction to systems and causal loop diagrams. Lund, Sweden: Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Lund Univ.
Houiellebecq, E., K. MacAskill, and F. Sittaro. 2023. “Using systems-thinking approaches to evaluate impacts to essential services in fragile contexts: A case study on Venezuela.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 40 (3): 91–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2023.2288611.
ICE (Institution of Civil Engineers). n.d. “Enabling better infrastructure: 12 guiding principles for prioritising and planning infrastructure.” Accessed July 16, 2022. https://myice.ice.org.uk/ICEDevelopmentWebPortal/media/Documents/Media/ice-enabling-better-infrastructure-report.pdf.
Jiménez, A., H. Le Deunff, P. Avello, and C. Scharp. 2016. “Enabling environment and water governance.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://siwi.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/wgf-enabling-environment-and-water-governance-web-1.pdf.
Kannan, A., O. Pritchard, C. Freakes, S. Carluccio, and N. Chauhan. 2021 “Governance of infrastructure for resilience.” Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.cdri.world/upload/pages/1727000334484455_202203111051whitepaperongovernanceofinfrastructureforresilience_0_compressed.pdf.
Khanna, T., K. Palepu, and J. Sinha. 2005. “Strategies that fit emerging markets.” Harv. Bus. Rev. 83 (63–74): 76.
KPMG International. 2014. Infrastructure 100—World markets report. Chennai, India: KPMG International.
KPMG International. 2022. “Infrastructure lifecycle services.” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://home.kpmg/jo/en/home/industries/infrastructure/why-kpmg/services-across-the-infrastructure-lifecycle.html.
Meadows, D. H. 2009. Thinking in systems. Edited by D. Wright. London: Earthscan.
MoF (Ministry of Finance, Republic of Ghana). 2022. “Overview—Debt Management Division: Background information on the establishment of debt management.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://mofep.gov.gh/index.php/divisions/dmd/overview.
Morgan, D. 2021a. ESD 150 lecture 2—Organisations and the system. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ.
Morgan, D. 2021b. ESD 150 lecture 4—Changing organisations pt 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ.
Mourgues, T., and C. Kingombe. 2017. “How to support African PPPs: The role of the enabling environment.” In The emerald handbook of public–private partnerships in developing and emerging economies, 269–310. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
Nassiry, D., S. Nakhooda, and S. Barnard. 2016. “Finding the pipeline: Project preparation for sustainable infrastructure.” Accessed August 1, 2022. https://odi.org/en/publications/finding-the-pipeline-project-preparation-for-sustainable-development/.
NIPP (National Integrated Planning and Programme). 2021. Infrastructure sectors: Key national level institutions. St. Lucia: Government of Saint Lucia.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2011. “Perspectives note: The enabling environment for capacity development.” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://www.oecd.org/dac/accountable-effective-institutions/48315248.pdf.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2015a. Infrastructure financing instruments and incentives. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2015b. Towards a framework for the governance of infrastructure. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2017. Infrastructure governance. Paris: OECD.
Pezza, D. A., and C. A. Pinto. 2019. “Applying systems thinking to coastal infrastructure systems.” Public Works Manage. Policy 24 (1): 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X18806523.
Savage, R. 2023 “Ghana and Zambia’s debt restructurings going in ‘diverging directions’—Citi.” Accessed June 5, 2023. https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/ghana-zambias-debt-restructurings-going-diverging-directions-citi-2023-03-17/.
Schwab, K., and S. Zahidi. 2020. “The global competitiveness report how countries are performing on the road to recovery.” Accessed August 20, 2022. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2020.pdf.
Serrenho, A. C. 2021. ESD200: Lecture 2—Systems Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ.
SITN (Sustainable Infrastructure Tool Navigator). 2022. “Sustainable infrastructure.” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://sustainable-infrastructure-tools.org/get-started/.
Thacker, S., D. Adshead, M. Fay, S. Hallegatte, M. Harvey, H. Meller, N. O’Regan, J. Rozenberg, G. Watkins, and J. W. Hall. 2019. “Infrastructure for sustainable development.” Nat. Sustainability 2 (4): 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8.
Uddin, M. S., J. K. Routray, and P. Warnitchai. 2019. “Systems thinking approach for resilient critical infrastructures in urban disaster management and sustainable development.” In Resilient structures and infrastructure, edited by E. Noroozinejad Farsangi, I. Takewaki, T. Yang, A. Astaneh-Asl, and P. Gardoni. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7446-3_15.
UNOPS (United Nations Office for Project Services). 2018a. Capacity assessment tool for infrastructure explainer document. Copenhagen, Denmark: UNOPS.
UNOPS (United Nations Office for Project Services). 2018b. MOU annex I—Description of technical assistance. Copenhagen, Denmark: UNOPS.
UNOPS (United Nations Office for Project Services). 2022. “Capacity assessment tool for infrastructure.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://cati.unops.org/.
UN (United Nations). 2015. Addis Ababa action agenda of the third international conference on financing for development. New York: UN.
Wallis-Lage, C., and Z. K. Erdal. 2022. “Resilience through systems thinking for water infrastructure.” In Water security under climate change. Water resources development and management, edited by A. K. Biswas and C. Tortajada. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5493-0_4.
Wegrich, K., G. Hammerschmid, and G. Kostka. 2017. The governance of infrastructure. New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. 2003. “Enabling environments for civic engagement in PRSP countries: A theoretical framework and tool for assessing the environment for civic engagement in bank-supported programs.” Accessed August 19, 2022. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/11319/279920PAPER0sdn82.pdf?sequence=1&=y.
World Bank. 2020. “Benchmarking infrastructure development.” Accessed August 24, 2022. https://bpp.worldbank.org/.
World Bank. 2023. “The world by income and region.” Accessed June 5, 2023. https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/the-world-by-income-and-region.html.
Zhang, Q., C. Prouty, J. B. Zimmerman, and J. R. Mihelcic. 2016. “More than target 6.3: A systems approach to rethinking sustainable development goals in a resource-scarce world.” Engineering 2 (4): 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.010.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 30Issue 4December 2024

History

Received: Feb 8, 2023
Accepted: May 21, 2024
Published online: Aug 22, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jan 22, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Infrastructure Advisory Consultant, Mott MacDonald Canada, 13 Riverview Dr., Brockville, ON, Canada K5V 2Y5; Centre for Sustainable Development, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-2287. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Richard Fenner, Ph.D., CEng. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9272-211X
Professor, Centre for Sustainable Development, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9272-211X

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share