Technical Papers
Oct 31, 2020

Stochastic Analysis of Network-Level Bridge Maintenance Needs Using Latin Hypercube Sampling

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 1

Abstract

The deterioration of bridge infrastructure along with diminishing funding resources necessitates reliable planning for future budget needs to maintain bridges at an acceptable level of performance. Although existing methodologies do consider uncertainties in individual bridge deterioration, there is a gap in the development of a network-level budget planning framework incorporating such stochastic phenomena. In this paper, a network-level needs-prediction simulation framework is proposed, that constructs confidence intervals for the output within a specific precision and significance level. Additionally, as the vast network size sets a demand for high computational effort, the Latin hypercube sampling technique is introduced to reduce the inherent simulation variance and decrease the number of replications needed. Ultimately, the applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using a case study pertaining to a network of structures comprising bridges and culverts within the Austin District of the Texas DOT (TxDOT). The results confirm the capability of the proposed methodology in providing meaningful budget confidence interval estimates at the network level by using a significantly reduced number of computational resources.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. Part of the case study was developed using the proprietary software Palisade Evolver along with Microsoft Excel. There are no other applicable restrictions.

Acknowledgments

Part of this research was supported by the Texas DOT Austin District. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Dr. Hui Wu, P.E., and Ms. Brenda Guerra, P.E., for providing bridge inspection data that was used in the case study.

References

ASCE. 2017. “Official website of the American society of civil engineers.” Accessed July 25, 2019. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/cat-item/bridges/.
Batouli, M., and A. Mostafavi. 2014. “A hybrid simulation framework for integrated management of infrastructure networks.” In Proc., Winter Simulation Conf. 2014, 3319–3330. New York: IEEE.
Batouli, M., O. A. Swei, J. Zhu, J. Gregory, R. Kirchain, and A. Mostafavi. 2015. “A simulation framework for network level cost analysis in infrastructure systems.” In Computing in civil engineering, 588–595. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chootinan, P., A. Chen, M. R. Horrocks, and D. Bolling. 2006. “A multi-year pavement maintenance program using a stochastic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 40 (9): 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.003.
Eglajs, V., and P. Audze. 1977. “New approach to the design of multifactor experiments.” Prob. Dyn. Strengths 35 (1): 104–107.
El-Adaway, I. 2013. “Systems modeling approach for sustainable infrastructure.” In Proc., ASCE Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, edited by I. Brilakis, S. Lee, and B. Becerik-Gerber, 137–144. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413029.018.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. Bridge preservation guide. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019. “Bridge replacement unit costs.” Accessed April 6, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/sd.cfm.
Gao, L., C. Xie, Z. Zhang, and S. T. Waller. 2012. “Network-level road pavement maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling for optimal performance improvement and budget utilization.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 27 (4): 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00733.x.
Gao, L., and Z. Zhang. 2009. “Approximate dynamic programming approach to network-level budget planning and allocation for pavement infrastructure.” In Proc., 88th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Gardner, B. J., D. D. Gransberg, and J. A. Rueda. 2017. “Stochastic conceptual cost estimating of highway projects to communicate uncertainty using bootstrap sampling.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000895.
Gharaibeh, N. G., Y. C. Chiu, and P. L. Gurian. 2006. “Decision methodology for allocating funds across transportation infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(1).
Guignier, F., and S. Madanat. 1999. Optimization of infrastructure systems maintenance and improvement policies. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Helton, J. C., and F. J. Davis. 2003. “Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 81 (1): 23–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(03)00058-9.
Hess, S., K. E. Train, and J. W. Polak. 2006. “On the use of a modified Latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice.” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 40 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.10.005.
Jia, G., A. A. Taflanidis, and J. L. Beck. 2017. “A new adaptive rejection sampling method using kernel density approximations and its application to subset simulation.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000841.
Kleiner, Y. 2001. Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Law, A. M. 2015. Simulation modeling and analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Liu, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2004. “Optimal bridge maintenance planning based on probabilistic performance prediction.” Eng. Struct. 26 (7): 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.003.
Mckay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. 2000. “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics 42 (1): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979.
Mizutani, D., N. Lethanh, B. T. Adey, and K. Kaito. 2017. “Improving the estimation of Markov transition probabilities using mechanistic-empirical models.” Frontier Built Environ. 3 (58): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00058.
Morcous, G. 2007. “Pareto analysis for multicriteria optimization of bridge preservation decisions.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1991 (1): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.3141/1991-08.
Ning, Y., M. Zou, R. Luo, X. Zhang, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Optimization strategy for improving power supply capacity in distribution networks with electric vehicle integration.” In Proc., IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing.
Porras-Alvarado, J. D., Z. Han, M. Al-Amin, and Z. Zhang. 2016. Fairness and efficiency considerations in performance-based, cross-asset resource allocation. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Sanford-Bernhardt, K. L., and S. McNeil. 2004. “Capturing interdependencies in pavement management decision-making using complex systems modeling.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Managing Pavements. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Sanford-Bernhardt, K. L., and S. McNeil. 2008. “Agent-based modeling: Approach for improving infrastructure management.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14 (3): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(253).
Shu, Z., and P. Jirutitijaroen. 2011. “Latin hypercube sampling techniques for power systems reliability analysis with renewable energy sources.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26 (4): 2066–2073. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2113380.
Sun, X., Z. Zhang, R. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Chapman. 2004. Analysis of past national bridge inventory ratings for predicting bridge system preservation needs. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wang, F., Z. Zhang, and R. B. Machemehl. 2003. Decision-making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Wang, Z., and A. Der Kiureghian. 2017. “Orthogonal plane sampling for high-dimensional reliability analysis.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 3 (3): D4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000901.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov chain-based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 1March 2021

History

Received: Mar 31, 2020
Accepted: Aug 3, 2020
Published online: Oct 31, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301 E Dean Keaton St., Stop C1761, Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3659-8211. Email: [email protected]
Zhanmin Zhang, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 301 E Dean Keaton St., Stop C1761, Austin, TX 78712. Email: [email protected]
Research Associate, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 3925 West Braker Ln., Austin, TX 78759. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9104-0179. Email: [email protected]
John J. Hasenbein, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, 204 E Dean Keaton, Austin, TX 78712. Email: [email protected]
Miguel Arellano [email protected]
P.E.
Deputy District Engineer, Austin District Headquarters, Texas Dept. of Transportation, 7901 N Interstate Hwy. 35, Austin, TX 78753. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share