Technical Papers
Oct 19, 2020

Temporal Disaggregation of Performance Measures to Manage Uncertainty in Transportation Logistics and Scheduling

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 1

Abstract

Transportation planning for highways is informed by performance metrics with aggregated data that can obfuscate the uncertainty of performance conditions across hours, days, and weeks. Recent advances in data collection methods provide disaggregated speed data at a regional level, which can be processed to inform planners and stakeholders of system performance hotspots. Based on the methods of corridor trace analysis (CTA), this paper extended the framework through temporal disaggregation of highway performance metrics, classified as a temporal corridor trace analysis, t-CTA. This approach introduces a temporal weight and temporal value associated with observed performance during discrete periods. The temporal value allows stakeholders to address uncertainty in logistics and scheduling, adjusting the significance of measured performance based on when the adverse conditions are observed. The t-CTA framework provides for analysis of multiple performance criteria across geographic regions and multiple temporal domains. This approach was demonstrated for a limited-access highway and principal arterial road network evaluated across five disparate periods. The availability of probe speed data and accessibility of the t-CTA framework has implications for national planning initiatives that must consider multiple objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may be provided only with restrictions. Per the data use agreement (DAU) for the Probe Data Analytics Suite (University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology Laboratory n.d.), the probe speed data are subject to restrictions on transferring or disclosing the data to entities that are not licensed to receive such data without prior written authorization from the data vendors (INRIX). Some data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including portions of the code and processed data used in the demonstration.

Acknowledgments

This effort has been supported in part by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), the Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC) and the Commonwealth Center for Advanced Logistics Systems (CCALS).

References

Alsultan, M., J. Jun, and J. H. Lambert. 2019. “Systems evaluation for access management of multiscale transportation networks.” In Proc., 2019 IEEE Int. Systems Conf. (SysCon), 1–8. New York: IEEE.
Alsultan, M., J. Jun, and J. H. Lambert. 2020. “Program evaluation of highway access with innovative risk-cost-benefit analysis.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 193 (Jan): 106649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106649.
Bostick, T. P., E. B. Connelly, J. H. Lambert, and I. Linkov. 2018. “Resilience science, policy and investment for civil infrastructure.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 175 (Jul): 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.025.
Brilon, W., J. Geistefeldt, and M. Regler. 2005. “Reliability of freeway traffic flow: A stochastic concept of capacity.” In Proc., 16th Int. Symp. on Transportation and Traffic Theory, 125–144. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Cambridge Systematics. 2005. An initial assessment of freight bottlenecks on highways. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Systematics.
Cambridge Systematics. 2013. Incorporating reliability performance measures into the transportation planning and programming processes. SHRP 2 reliability project L05. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Cheng, S., F. Lu, P. Peng, and S. Wu. 2018. “Short-term traffic forecasting: An adaptive ST-KNN model that considers spatial heterogeneity.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 71 (Sep): 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.05.009.
Collier, Z. A., D. Hendrickson, T. L. Polmateer, and J. H. Lambert. 2018. “Scenario analysis and PERT/CPM applied to strategic investment at an automated container port.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (3): 04018026. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000976.
Collier, Z. A., and J. H. Lambert. 2018. “Time management of infrastructure recovery schedules by anticipation and valuation of disruptions.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 4 (2): 04018012. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000961.
Connelly, E. B., J. H. Lambert, and S. A. Thekdi. 2015. “Robust investments in humanitarian logistics and supply chains for disaster resilience and sustainable communities.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 17 (1): 04015017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000187.
Dehghani, M. S., G. Flintsch, and S. McNeil. 2017. “Parametric analysis of roadway infrastructure vulnerability to disruptions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (4): 04017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000371.
Dowling, R., K. Parks, B. Nevers, J. Josselyn, and S. Gayle. 2015. Incorporating reliability into the congestion management process: A primer. Washington, DC: USDOT.
Dutta, N., R. A. Boateng, and M. D. Fontaine. 2019. “Safety and operational effects of the Interstate 66 active traffic management system.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A: Syst. 145 (3): 04018089. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000220.
Dutta, N., and M. D. Fontaine. 2019. “Improving freeway segment crash prediction models by including disaggregate speed data from different sources.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 132 (Nov): 105253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.029.
Farrow, S. 2004. “Using risk assessment, benefit-cost analysis, and real options to implement a precautionary principle.” Risk Anal. 24 (3): 727–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00471.x.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. MAP-21 proposed measures for congestion, reliability, and freight. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. National performance measures for congestion, reliability, and freight, and CMAQ traffic congestion. Washington DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019a. Considerations of current and emerging transportation management center data. Washington, DC: FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2019b. “The urban congestion report (UCR): Documentation and definitions.” Accessed November 1, 2019. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/perf_measurement/ucr/documentation.htm.
Frohwein, H., J. Lambert, Y. Haimes, and L. Schiff. 1999. “Multicriteria framework to aid comparison of roadway improvement project.” J. Transp. Eng. 125 (3): 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:3(224).
Haimes, Y. Y. 2009. Risk modeling, assessment, and management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Haimes, Y. Y. 2019. Modeling and managing interdependent complex systems of systems. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Haimes, Y. Y., S. Kaplan, and J. H. Lambert. 2002. “Risk filtering, ranking, and management framework using hierarchical holographic modeling.” Risk Anal. 22 (2): 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00020.
INRIX. 2018. “Transportation agencies turn to INRIX to get more out of NPMRDS.” Accessed December 2, 2019. http://inrix.com/blog/2018/08/transportation-agencies-use-npmrds/.
Karvetski, C. W., J. H. Lambert, J. M. Keisler, and I. Linkov. 2011. “Integration of decision analysis and scenario planning for coastal engineering and climate change.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A: Syst. Humans 41 (1): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2055154.
Kidando, E., R. Moses, T. Sando, and E. E. Ozguven. 2018. “Evaluating recurring traffic congestion using change point regression and random variation Markov structured model.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (20): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118787987.
Kim, S., and B. Coifman. 2014. “Comparing INRIX speed data against concurrent loop detector stations over several months.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 49 (614): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.10.002.
Lambert, J. H., et al. 2011a. “Prioritizing infrastructure investments in Afghanistan with multiagency stakeholders and deep uncertainty of emergent conditions.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (2): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000078.
Lambert, J. H., S. A. Theckdi, and Q. Zhou. 2011b. Land development risk analysis for multimodal transportation corridors. Richmond, VA: Virginia DOT.
Lambert, J. H., Y.-J. Wu, H. You, A. Clarens, and B. Smith. 2012. “Climate change influence on priority setting for transportation infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (1): 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000094.
Leite, F., Y. Cho, A. H. Behzadan, S. Lee, S. Choe, Y. Fang, R. Akhavian, and S. Hwang. 2016. “Visualization, information modeling, and simulation: Grand challenges in the construction industry.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (6): 04016035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000604.
Linthicum, A. S., and J. H. Lambert. 2010. “Risk management for infrastructure corridors vulnerable to adjacent land development.” J. Risk Res. 13 (8): 983–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.486076.
Mackie, P., and J. Preston. 1998. “Twenty-one sources of error and bias in transport project appraisal.” Transp. Policy 5 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00004-3.
Maier, M., and E. Rechtin. 2009. The art of systems architecting. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. 2014. Value of travel time reliability in transportation decision making: Proof of concept—Maryland. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine.
Ossenbruggen, P. J., and E. M. Laflamme. 2012. “Time series analysis and models of freeway performance.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (8): 1030–1039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000403.
Prasannakumar, V., H. Vijith, R. Charutha, and N. Geetha. 2011. “Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment.” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 21 (2011): 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.020.
Rogerson, E. C., J. H. Lambert, and A. F. Johns. 2013. “Runway safety program evaluation with uncertainties of benefits and costs.” J. Risk Res. 16 (5): 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.725674.
Schultz, G., K. Braley, and T. Boschert. 2008. “Prioritizing access management implementation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2092 (1): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.3141/2092-07.
Shojaat, S., J. Geistefeldt, S. A. Parr, C. G. Wilmot, and B. Wolshon. 2016. “Sustained flow index: Stochastic measure of freeway performance.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2554 (1): 158–165. https://doi.org/10.3141/2554-17.
Skabardonis, A., P. Varaiya, and K. F. Petty. 2008. “Measuring recurrent and nonrecurrent traffic congestion.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1856 (1): 118–124. https://doi.org/10.3141/1856-12.
Sohrabi, S., and A. Ermagun. 2018. “Optimum capacity of freeways: A stochastic approach.” J. Transp. Eng. Part A: Syst. 144 (7): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000156.
Thekdi, S. A., and J. H. Lambert. 2015. “Integrated risk management of safety and development on transportation corridors.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138 (Jun): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.11.015.
Thorisson, H., and J. H. Lambert. 2017. “Multiscale identification of emergent and future conditions along corridors of transportation networks.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167 (Nov): 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.005.
Transportation Research Board. 2010. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: TRB of the National Academies.
Transportation Research Board. 2012. Analytical procedures for determining the impacts of reliability mitigation strategies. SHRP 2 report S2-L03-RR-1. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Tufte, E. R. 2005. Visual explanations. Cheshire, UK: Graphics Press.
Turner, S., and T. Qu. 2013. Developing Twin Cities arterial mobility performance measures using GPS speed data. St. Paul, MN: DOT, Research Services.
University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology Laboratory. n.d. “The RITIS vehicle probe project suite.” Accessed January 11, 2019. https://pda.ritis.org/suite/.
USDOT. 2011. The value of travel time savings: Departmental guidance for conducting economic evaluations revision 2 introduction. Washington, DC: USDOT.
VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation). 2018. 2018 Virginia Department of Transportation jurisdiction report daily traffic volume estimates including vehicle classification estimates. Richmond, VA: VDOT.
VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation). 2019. “VDOT pathways for planning.” Accessed December 1, 2019. https://vdotp4p.com/.
Virginia Transportation Research Council. 2017. Considerations for calculating arterial system performance measures in Virginia. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.
Xu, J., and J. H. Lambert. 2013. “Distributed travel time savings of a multiscale transportation access management program.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 33 (3): 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-013-9459-0.
Xu, J., and J. H. Lambert. 2015. “Risk-cost-benefit analysis for transportation corridors with interval uncertainties of heterogeneous data.” Risk Anal. 35 (4): 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12231.
You, H., E. B. Connelly, J. H. Lambert, and A. F. Clarens. 2014a. “Climate and other scenarios disrupt priorities in several management perspectives.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 34 (4): 540–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-014-9525-2.
You, H., J. H. Lambert, A. F. Clarens, and B. J. McFarlane. 2014b. “Quantifying the influence of climate change to priorities for infrastructure projects.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst. 44 (2): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2013.2248709.
Zhao, W., E. McCormack, D. J. Dailey, and E. Scharnhorst. 2013. “Using truck probe GPS data to identify and rank roadway bottlenecks.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000444.
Zhu, S., G. Jiang, and H. K. Lo. 2018. “Capturing value of reliability through road pricing in congested traffic under uncertainty.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol. 94 (Sep): 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.016.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 1March 2021

History

Received: Feb 7, 2020
Accepted: Jul 10, 2020
Published online: Oct 19, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 19, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

P.E.
Researcher, Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems, Dept. of Engineering Systems and Environment, Univ. of Virginia, Olsson Hall 112, 151 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400736, Charlottesville, VA 22903 corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-9081. Email: [email protected]
Jungwook Jun, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Planning Data Solutions Manager, Transportation and Mobility Planning Div., Virginia Dept. of Transportation, 1401 E Broad St., Richmond, VA 23219. Email: [email protected]
Geraldine S. Jones [email protected]
Data Management System Administrator, Transportation and Mobility Planning Div., Virginia Dept. of Transportation, 1401 E Broad St., Richmond, VA 23219. Email: [email protected]
James H. Lambert, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
D.WRE
Director, Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems, Dept. of Engineering Systems and Environment, Univ. of Virginia, Olsson Hall 112, 151 Engineer’s Way, P.O. Box 400736, Charlottesville, VA 22903. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share