Technical Papers
Jul 6, 2020

Infrastructure Project Investment Decision Timing Using a Real Options Analysis Framework with Rainbow Option

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 3

Abstract

The infrastructure construction industry has always been plagued with significant uncertainty. It is therefore crucial for decision makers (DMs) to ascertain suitable investment timing, and there is still a need for a paradigm to assist them. Real options analysis (ROA) is a project evaluation method that allows DMs to incorporate volatility into their analyses. This study uses ROA to create a decision framework to determine the optimal infrastructure investment decision timing. Two types of ROA, the traditional option and the rainbow option, are used in the analysis to examine the impacts of these methods on timing. The paper’s case study involves construction of a gas station in the Bangkok metropolitan region and takes the price of and demand for gas as the sources of uncertainty. The paper also carries out a loss value analysis. The results suggest that the DM should postpone the decision further when volatility increases due to a “wait-and-see” strategy. We introduce loss value to compensate for depreciation in the value of the project due to deferment. The results of the evaluation and the sensitivity analysis confirm that compared to nonconsideration of investment value, consideration can lead to an earlier optimal time for the investment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by the Graduate Program Scholarship from The Graduate School, Kasetsart University. Any opinions, findings, and recommendations in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the funding agency.

References

Athigakunagorn, N. 2015. “Using real options theory to enhance highway asset intervention scheduling.” Ph.D dissertation, College of Engineering, Purdue Univ.
Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” J. Political Econ. 81 (3): 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062.
Boyle, P., and J. McDougall. 2018. Trading and pricing financial derivatives: A guide to futures, options, and swaps. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Brach, M. A. 2003. Vol. 198 of Real options in practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bradley, B. A., R. P. Dhakal, M. Cubrinovski, G. A. MacRae, and D. S. Lee. 2009. “Seismic loss estimation for efficient decision making.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 42 (2): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.42.2.96-110.
Copeland, T., and V. Antikarov. 2001. Real options: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Texere.
Cox, J. C., S. A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein. 1979. “Option pricing: A simplified approach.” J. Financial Econ. 7 (3): 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1.
De Neufville, R., S. Scholtes, and T. Wang. 2006. “Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (2): 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(107).
De Reyck, B., Z. Degraeve, and R. Vandenborre. 2008. “Project options valuation with net present value and decision tree analysis.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184 (1): 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.047.
Dixit, A. K., R. K. Dixit, and R. S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
EPPO (Energy Policy and Planning Office). 2019. “Petroleum products consumption.” Accessed October 21, 2019. http://www.eppo.go.th/index.php/th/energy-information/situation-oil-electric.
Fridgen, G., C. König, L. Häfner, and T. Sachs. 2016. “Providing utility to utilities: The value of information systems enabled flexibility in electricity consumption.” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17 (8): 537. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00434.
Gilbert, E. 2004. “Investment basics XLIX. An introduction to real options.” Investment Analysts J. 33 (60): 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2004.11082463.
Glantz, M., and J. Mun. 2010. Credit engineering for bankers: A practical guide for bank lending. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Godinho, P., and J. Dias. 2012. “Cost-benefit analysis and the optimal timing of road infrastructures.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (4): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000105.
Goumas, M. G., V. A. Lygerou, and L. E. Papayannakis. 1999. “Computational methods for planning and evaluating geothermal energy projects.” Energy Policy 27 (3): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00007-5.
Haahtela, T. 2012. “Differences between financial options and real options.” Lect. Notes Manage. Sci. 4 (1): 169–178.
Hansen, L. P. 2014. “Uncertainty outside and inside economic models.” J. Political Econ. 122 (5): 945–987. https://doi.org/10.1086/678456.
Henao, A., E. Sauma, T. Reyes, and A. Gonzalez. 2017. “What is the value of the option to defer an investment in transmission expansion planning? An estimation using real options.” Energy Econ. 65 (Jun): 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.001.
Huang, Y. L., and S. P. Chou. 2006. “Valuation of the minimum revenue guarantee and the option to abandon in BOT infrastructure projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 24 (4): 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500434997.
Khurshid, M. B., M. Irfan, A. Ahmed, and S. Labi. 2015. “A framework for assessing the consequences of deferred or hastened highway asset interventions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (3): 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.875046.
Khurshid, M. B., M. Irfan, and S. Labi. 2011. “Optimal performance threshold determination for highway asset interventions: Analytical framework and application.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (2): 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000198.
Kim, K., S. Ha, and H. Kim. 2017. “Using real options for urban infrastructure adaptation under climate change.” J. Cleaner Prod. 143 (Feb): 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.152.
Knight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Kodukula, P., and C. Papudesu. 2006. Project valuation using real options: A practitioner’s guide. Fort Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
Liu, J., and C. Y. Cheah. 2009. “Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 27 (4): 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902807071.
McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. 1986. “The value of waiting to invest.” Q. J. Econ. 101 (4): 707–727. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884175.
Merton, R. C. 1973. “Theory of rational option pricing.” Bell J. Econ. Manage. Sci. 4 (1): 141–183. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003143.
Mun, J. 2002. Vol. 137 of Real options analysis: Tools and techniques for valuing strategic investments and decisions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Myers, S. C. 1977. “Determinants of corporate borrowing.” J. Financial Econ. 5 (2): 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0.
Nuti, C., and I. Vanzi. 2003. “To retrofit or not to retrofit?” Eng. Struct. 25 (6): 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00190-6.
Oh, S., K. Kim, and H. Kim. 2018. “Investment decision for coastal urban development projects considering the impact of climate change: Case study of the Great Garuda Project in Indonesia.” J. Cleaner Prod. 178 (Mar): 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.283.
Ouwehand, P., and G. West. 2006. “Pricing rainbow options.” Wilmott Mag. 5: 74–80.
Parkinson, M. 1977. “Option pricing: The American put.” J. Bus. 50 (1): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1086/295902.
Peshkin, D. G., T. E. Hoerner, and K. A. Zimmerman. 2004. Vol. 523 of Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
PTT (Petroleum Authority of Thailand). 2019. “Oil price in Bangkok and vicinity.” Accessed October 21, 2019. http://www.pttplc.com/en/Media-Center/Oil-Price/Pages/Bangkok-Oil-Price.aspx.
Rose, S. 1998. “Valuation of interacting real options in a tollroad infrastructure project.” Q. Rev. Econ. Finance 38 (3): 711–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9769(99)80098-2.
Rubinstein, M. 1994. “Implied binomial trees.” J. Finance 49 (3): 771–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00079.x.
Savvidis, R., D. Pachakis, and A. Giaralis. 2019. “Optimal seismic upgrade timing in seaports with increasing throughput demand via real options.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 5 (1): 04018048. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001003.
Shan, L., M. J. Garvin, and R. Kumar. 2010. “Collar options to manage revenue risks in real toll public–private partnership transportation projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 28 (10): 1057–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.506645.
Sinha, K. C., and S. Labi. 2011. Transportation decision making: Principles of project evaluation and programming. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Taneja, P., M. E. Aartsen, J. A. Annema, and M. Van Schuylenburg. 2010. “Real options for port infrastructure investments.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Next Generation Infrastructure Systems for Eco-Cities. New York: IEEE.
Triantis, A. 2005. “Realizing the potential of real options: Does theory meet practice?” J. Appl. Corp. Finance 17 (2): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2005.00028.x.
Trigeorgis, L. 1991. “A log-transformed binomial numerical analysis method for valuing complex multi-option investments.” J. Financial Quant. Anal. 26 (3): 309–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331209.
Trigeorgis, L. 1996. Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yin, J., Y. Wu, and L. Lu. 2019. “Assessment of investment decision in the dry bulk shipping market based on real options thinking and the shipping cycle perspective.” Marit. Policy Manage. 46 (3): 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1520400.
Zhao, T., S. K. Sundararajan, and C. L. Tseng. 2004. “Highway development decision-making under uncertainty: A real options approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 10 (1): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:1(23).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6Issue 3September 2020

History

Received: Nov 21, 2019
Accepted: Apr 28, 2020
Published online: Jul 6, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Dec 6, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jatupol Siripongvakin [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart Univ., Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart Univ., Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-1270. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share