Technical Papers
Oct 24, 2019

Road Safety: Risk Management Perspective

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Risk is ubiquitous and is associated with a very wide range of human activities. This has resulted in the development of an internationally agreed set of principles and guidelines for risk management in general. This paper describes the methods and processes that have been developed for general risk management, along with some of the knowledge upon which those methods and processes are based. It is argued that road safety could be improved by employing those methods and processes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allman, W. F. 1985. “We have nothing to fear, but a few zillion things.” Science 85 (6): 38–41.
Allsop, R. E. 2016. “Vision Zero is flawed, but we should harness its spirit to keep driving down deaths.” Local Transport Today, August 19, 2016.
Banks, V. A., A. Eriksson, J. O’Donoghue, and N. A. Stanton. 2018. “Is partially automated driving a bad idea? Observations from an on-road study.” Appl. Ergon. 68 (Apr): 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.11.010.
Chan, S. 2017. “Stanislav Petrov, Soviet officer who helped avert nuclear war, is dead at 77.” New York Times, September 18, 2017.
Chapman, R. A. 1967. “Traffic collision exposure.” In Proc., National Roads Board Roading Symp., 184–198. Wellington, New Zealand: National Roads Board.
Chapman, R. A. 1971a. “Accident risks at intersections.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., New Zealand Roading Symp., 193–197. Wellington, New Zealand: National Roads Board.
Chapman, R. A. 1971b. “Some relationships between road accident frequencies and measures of exposure to risk.” Ph.D. thesis, Transport Studies, Univ. College London.
Davidshofer, C. O. 1976. “Risk-taking and vocational choice: A re-evaluation.” J. Couns. Psychol. 23 (2): 151–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.23.2.151.
Elms, D. G. 1998. “Overview—Prudence, principles and practice.” In Owning the future: Integrated risk management in practice, edited by D. Elms. Christchurch, NZ: Centre for Advanced Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury.
Elvik, R. 2015. “Some implications of an event-based definition of exposure to the risk of road accident.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 76 (Mar): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.011.
EPA. 1988. Seven cardinal rules of risk communication. Washington, DC: EPA.
Evans, A. W. 1994. “Evaluating public transport and road safety measures.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 26 (4): 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(94)90033-7.
Evans, L. 1985. “Human behaviour feedback and traffic safety.” Hum. Factors 27 (5): 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700505.
Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. 1982. “Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk.” Am. Statistician 36 (3): 240–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/2683835.
Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. J. Read, and B. Combs. 1978. “How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits.” Policy Sci. 9 (2): 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739.
Ford, R. 2000. “Risk, perception and the cold numbers.” Modern Railways, October 10, 2000.
Fuller, R. 2000. “The task-capability interface model of the driving process.” Recherche Transports Sécurité 66 (Jan–Mar): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0761-8980(00)90006-2.
Fuller, R. 2008. “What drives the driver? Surface tensions and hidden consensus.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Traffic and Transport Psychology. Indianapolis: International Association of Applied Psychology.
Gazis, D. C., R. Herman, and A. A. Maradudin. 1960. “The problem of the amber signal in traffic flow.” Oper. Res. 8 (1): 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.8.1.112.
Haight, F. A. 1986. “Risk, especially the risk of traffic accident.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 18 (5): 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(86)90009-6.
Harwood, D. W., D. J. Torbic, K. R. Richard, and M. M. Meyer. 2010. Safety analyst: Software tools for safety management of specific highway sites. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Hauer, E. 1982. “Traffic conflicts and exposure.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 14 (5): 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(82)90014-8.
Hauer, E., and B. N. Persaud. 1996. Safety analysis of roadway geometry and ancillary features. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Health and Safety Commission. 1991. Major hazard aspects of the transport of dangerous substances. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Health and Safety Executive. 2001. Reducing risks, protecting people—HSE’s decision-making process. London: Health and Safety Executive.
Hjälmdahl, M. 2004. “In-vehicle speed adaptation: On the effectiveness of a voluntary system.” Ph.D. thesis, Lund Institute of Technology, Univ. of Lund.
ISO. 2009a. Risk management—Principles and guidelines. ISO 31000. Geneva: ISO.
ISO. 2009b. Risk management—Risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC 31010. Geneva: ISO.
Janoske, M., B. Liu, and B. Sheppard. 2012. Understanding risk communication best practices: A guide for emergency managers and communicators. College Park, MD: US Dept. of Homeland Security.
Joshua, S. C., and N. J. Garber. 1992. “A causal analysis of large truck accidents through fault tree analysis.” Risk Anal. 12 (2): 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00666.x.
Keeney, R. L., and D. von Winterfeldt. 1986. “Improving risk communication.” Risk Anal. 6 (4): 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00954.x.
Lowrance, W. W. 1976. Of acceptable risk. Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
Mahalel, D. 1986. “A note on accident risk.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1068: 85–89.
Maher, M. J., and I. Summersgill. 1996. “A comprehensive methodology for the fitting of predictive accident models.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 28 (3): 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(95)00059-3.
Menzies, A., and A. J. Nicholson. 2003. “Analysing the amber dilemma problem using risk analysis techniques.” In Proc., Institution of Professional Engineers NZ Transportation Group Conf. Wellington, New Zealand: Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand.
Ministry of Transport. 2003. Road safety to 2010. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Transport.
Murphy, S. L., J. Xu, K. D. Kochanek, S. C. Curtin, and E. Arias. 2017. Deaths: Final data for 2015. Hyattsville, MD: Dept. of Health and Human Services.
New Zealand Automobile Association. 2010. How safe are our roads: Star rating New Zealand’s state highways. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Automobile Association.
New Zealand Automobile Association. 2012. How safe are our Roads: Tracking the safety performance of New Zealand’s state highway network. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Automobile Association.
Nicholson, A. J. 2002. “Road safety: A risk evaluation and management perspective.” In Proc., Int. Conf. of Institute of Transportation Engineers. Auburn, VIC, Australia: Institute of Transportation Engineers.
Sabey, B. E. 1983. “Road safety in the 80’s.” In Proc., Symp. on Recent Developments and Research in Road Safety Remedial Measures. Manchester, UK: Univ. of Salford.
Sabey, B. E., and G. C. Staughton. 1975. “Interacting roles of road environment, vehicle and road user in accidents.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. of Int. Association for Accident and Traffic Medicine. Stockholm, Sweden: International Association for Accident and Traffic Medicine.
Sandman, P. M. 1993. Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.
Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of risk.” Science 236 (4799): 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507.
Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor. 2007. “The affect heuristic.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177 (3): 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.
Starr, C. 1969. “Social benefit versus technological risk. What is our society willing to pay for safety?” Science 165 (3899): 1232–1238. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3899.1232.
Taig, T. 1998. “Risk, responsibility and decision—Good practice and good business. In Owning the future: Integrated risk management in practice, edited by D. Elms. Christchurch, New Zealand: Centre for Advanced Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury.
Tefft, B. C. 2017. Rates of motor vehicle crashes, injuries and deaths in relation to driver age, United States, 2014–2015. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
Treat, J. R. 1980. “A study of pre-crash factors involved in traffic accidents.” HSRI Res. Rev. 10 (6): 1–35.
Turner, S. A., and A. J. Nicholson. 1998. “Intersection accident estimation: The role of intersection location and non-collision flows.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 30 (4): 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00095-X.
Vissers, L., S. van der Kint, I. van Schagen, and M. Hagenzieker. 2016. Safe interaction between cyclists, pedestrians and automated vehicles. The Hague, Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
Vlakveld, W. 2015. Transition of control in highly automated vehicles. The Hague, Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research.
Von Winterfeldt, D., and W. Edwards. 1986. Decision analysis and behavioural research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Washington, A. J. 2015. The ability to quantify rural road crash risk in New Zealand using probabilistic risk assessment methods. Christchurch, New Zealand: Univ. of Canterbury.
Wilde, G. J. S. 1982. “The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health.” Risk Anal. 2 (4): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01384.x.
Wong, Y.-D., and A. J. Nicholson. 1992. “Driver behaviour at horizontal curves: Risk compensation and the margin of safety.” Accid. Anal. Prev. 24 (4): 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(92)90053-L.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Sep 19, 2018
Accepted: May 3, 2019
Published online: Oct 24, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6256-9823. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share