Technical Papers
Dec 31, 2018

Optimal Seismic Upgrade Timing in Seaports with Increasing Throughput Demand via Real Options

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 1

Abstract

A real options (RO) formulation is proposed for decision making on the timing to upgrade the seismic performance of existing seaports with increasing throughput demand in earthquake-prone areas. The payoff for the seismic upgrade investment option is estimated based on projected net earnings, repair cost, and downtime for a damaging reference seismic event having a prespecified annual probability of occurrence. These projections inform a discrete-time RO binomial tree, following the American option valuation framework, which propagates the probability of the reference seismic event assuming Poisson temporal distribution of earthquake occurrence. The net present value of the expected annual payoff of the considered investment is used as an index supporting risk-informed decision making discounted by the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Numerical examples pertaining to decision makers with different capital costs—namely, port authorities and terminal operators—operating in different economic environments typical of developed and developing countries are furnished to illustrate the applicability of the proposed RO formulation. It is found that high WACC and/or low throughput growth bring the optimal seismic upgrade timing forward, while earthquake consequences and upgrade cost have almost no influence on this timing.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ASCE. 2014. Seismic design of piers and wharves. ASCE/COPRI 61. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Avramidis, I., A. Athanatopoulou, K. Morfidis, A. Sextos, and A. Giaralis. 2016. Eurocode-compliant seismic analysis and design of R/C buildings: Concepts, commentary and worked examples with flowcharts. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering. New York: Springer.
Berle, O., B. E. Asbjornslett, and J. B. Rice. 2011. “Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (6): 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.011.
Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” J. Political Econ. 81 (3): 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062.
Bono, F., and E. Gutierrez. 2011. “A network-based analysis of the impact of structural damage on urban accessibility following a disaster: The case of the seismically damaged Port Au Prince and Carrefour urban road networks.” J. Transp. Geogr. 19 (6): 1443–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.08.002.
Bradley, B. A., R. P. Dhakal, M. Cubrinovski, G. A. MacRae, and D. S. Lee. 2009. “Seismic loss estimation for efficient decision making.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 42 (2): 96–110.
Brandao, L. E., J. S. Dyer, and W. J. Hahn. 2005. “Using binomial decision trees to solve real-option valuation problems.” Decis. Anal. 2 (2): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1050.0040.
Burden, L. I., G. Rix, and S. Werner. 2016. “Development of a risk framework for forecasting earthquake losses in port systems.” Earthquake Spectra 32 (1): 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1193/043013EQS117M.
Byrne, M., H. Sipsas, and T. Thompson. 1996. “Financing port infrastructure.” Int. Adv. Econ. Res. 2 (4): 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295471.
Canada, J. R., W. G. Sullivan, D. J. Kulonda, and J. A. White. 2004. Capital investment analysis for engineering and management. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carmichael, D. G. 2014. Infrastructure investment: An engineering perspective. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Caterino, N., I. Iervolino, G. Manfredi, and E. Cosenza. 2008. “Multi-criteria decision making for seismic retrofitting of RC structure.” J. Earthquake Eng. 12 (4): 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701572872.
Chang, S. E. 2000. “Disasters and transport systems: Loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake.” J. Transp. Geogr. 8 (1): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(99)00023-X.
Chang, S. E. 2010. “Urban disaster recovery: A measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake.” Disasters 34 (2): 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.x.
Chiu, C.-K., F.-P. Hsiao, and W.-Y. Jean. 2013. “A novel lifetime cost-benefit analysis method for seismic retrofitting of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (9): 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2011.631114.
Cornell, C. A., and S. R. Winterstein. 1988. “Temporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78 (4): 1522–1537.
Cox, J. C., S. A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein. 1979. “Option pricing: A simplified approach.” J. Financial Econ. 7 (3): 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1.
De Neufville, R., S. Scholtes, and T. Wang. 2006. “Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (2): 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(107).
Duffie, D. 2001. Dynamic asset pricing theory. Princeton Series in Finance. 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fernandez, P. 2017. “Company valuation methods.” Accessed October 11, 2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=274973.
Flynn, M., P. T. W. Lee, and T. Notteboom. 2011. “The next step on the port generations ladder: Customer-centric and community ports.” In Current issues in shipping, ports and logistics, edited by T. Notteboom, 497–510. Brussels: University Press Antwerp.
Fotinos, G., G. M. Serventi, and L. Scheibel. 1992. “Earthquake damage repair and retrofit of the Seventh Street Terminal, Port of Oakland.” In Proc., PORTS ‘92 Conf., 429–442. New York: ASCE.
Graf, W. P., D. Dittmer, T. Wharton, and H. Conradt. 2016. “Portwide seismic risk assessment: (2) benefit-cost analysis.” In Proc., 14th Triennial Int. Conf., 434–440. New York: ASCE.
Herder, P. M., J. De Joode, A. Ligtvoet, S. Schenk, and P. Taneja. 2011. “Buying real options-valuing uncertainty in infrastructure planning.” Futures 43 (9): 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.005.
Hull, J. C. 2012. Options, futures, and other derivatives. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson Education Limited.
Kappos, A. J., and E. Dimitrakopoulos. 2008. “Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis with the aid of fragility curves.” Nat. Hazard. 45 (1): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9155-9.
Lam, J. S., and S. Su. 2015. “Disruption risks and mitigation strategies: An analysis of Asian ports.” Marit. Policy Manage. 42 (5): 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1016560.
Liel, A. B., and G. G. Deierlein. 2013. “Cost-benefit evaluation of seismic risk mitigation alternatives for older concrete frame buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (4): 1391–1411. https://doi.org/10.1193/030911EQS040M.
Luenberger, D. 1998. Investment science. New York: Oxford University Press.
McGuire, R. K. 2004. Seismic hazard and risk analysis: MNO-10. Oakland, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
McMahon, S., S. Dickenson, S. Schlechter, and J. Gordon. 2016. “Portwide seismic risk assessment: (1) Engineering analyses.” In Proc., 14th Triennial Int. Conf., 423–433. New York: ASCE.
Na, U., and M. Shinozuka. 2009. “Simulation-based seismic loss estimation of seaport transportation system.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 (3): 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.07.005.
Nuti, C., and I. Vanzi. 2003. “To retrofit or not to retrofit?” Eng. Struct. 25 (6): 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00190-6.
Omer, M., A. Mostashari, R. Nilchiani, and M. Mansouri. 2012. “A framework for assessing resiliency of maritime transportation systems.” Marit. Policy Manage. 39 (7): 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.689878.
Pachakis, D., and A. S. Kiremidjian. 2004. “Estimation of downtime-related revenue losses in seaports following scenario earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (2): 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1705655.
Pachakis, D., and A. S. Kiremidjian. 2005. “Probabilistic loss estimation for earthquake occurrences modeled as a Poisson process.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR’05. Rotterdam: Millpress.
Parzen, E. 1999. Stochastic processes. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Peng, Y., W. Wang, Z. Guo, Z. Song, and Q. Zhang. 2016. “A stochastic seaport network retrofit management problem considering shipping routing design.” Ocean Coastal Manage. 119: 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.10.013.
PIANC (International Navigation Association). 2001. Seismic design guidelines for port structures. London: Taylor and Francis.
Porter, K. A., J. L. Beck, and R. Shaikhutdinov. 2004. “Simplified estimation of economic seismic risk for buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (4): 1239–1263. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1809129.
Port of Oakland Seaport. 2015. “Tariff 2-A.” Accessed October 10, 2017. https://www.oaklandseaport.com/seaport-resources/tariff-2-a/.
Port Technology. 2017. “Battered carriers looking bullish.” Accessed October 16, 2017. https://www.porttechnology.org/news/battered_carriers_looking_bullish.
Power, G. J., D. Charli, M. Tandja, J. Bastien, and P. Grégoire. 2015. “Measuring infrastructure investment option value.” J. Risk Finance 16 (1): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-05-2014-0072.
Ross, S. M. 2014. Introduction to probability models. 11th ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Scharks, T., A. Bostrom, L. Reimann-Garretson, and G. Rix. 2014. “Risk decision making and seismic risk preparedness at North American seaports: Analysis of a system-wide survey.” Earthquake Spectra 30 (4): 1511–1529. https://doi.org/10.1193/081711EQS199M.
Shafieezadeh, A., and L. I. Burden. 2014. “Scenario-based resilience assessment framework for critical infrastructure systems: Case study for seismic resilience of seaports.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 132: 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021.
Smyth, A. W., G. Altay, G. Deodatis, M. Erdik, G. Franco, P. Gülkan, and H. Kunreuther. 2004. “Probabilistic benefit-cost analysis for earthquake damage mitigation: Evaluating measures for apartment houses in Turkey.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (1): 171–203. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1649937.
Stevenson, J. R., H. Kachali, Z. Whitman, E. Seville, J. Vargo, and T. Wilson. 2011. “Preliminary observations of the impacts the 22 February Christchurch earthquake had on organisations and the economy: A report from the field (22 February–22 March 2011).” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 44 (2): 65–77.
Taneja, P., M. E. Aartsen, J. A. Annema, and M. Van Schuylenburg. 2010. “Real options for port infrastructure investments.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Next Generation Infrastructure Systems for Eco-Cities. New York: IEEE.
Taylor, C., G. Rix, and F. Liu. 2009. “Exploring financial decision-making approaches for use in earthquake risk decision processes for ports.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 15 (4): 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:4(406).
Thomas, P. J., and N. Chrysanthou. 2012. “Using real options to compare the economics of nuclear power and wind power with electricity from natural gas.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part A: J. Power Energy 226 (3): 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650911428114.
Trigeorgis, L. 1996. Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Trigeorgis, L., and J. J. Reuer. 2017. “Real options theory in strategic management.” Strategic Manage. J. 38 (1): 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2593.
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2015. Review of maritime transport 2015. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
Werner, S., S. Dickenson, and C. Taylor. 1997. “Seismic risk reduction at ports.” J. Waterways Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 123 (6): 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1997)123:6(337).
Zhang, Y., and J. S. L. Lam. 2016. “Estimating economic losses of industry clusters due to port disruptions.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 91: 17–33.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 5Issue 1March 2019

History

Received: Jul 20, 2018
Accepted: Oct 1, 2018
Published online: Dec 31, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: May 31, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rafail Savvidis [email protected]
Managing Director, SINNDE Construction, A. Metaxa Ave. 21, 16675 Athens, Greece. Email: [email protected]
Dimitrios Pachakis, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Technical Director, COWI, 24 Bevis Marks, London EC3A 7JB, UK. Email: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, City, Univ. of London, Northampton Square, London EC3A 7JB, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-1171. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share