Technical Papers
Feb 14, 2018

Vulnerability Assessment for Earthquake Liquefaction–Induced Settlements of an Embankment Using Gaussian Processes

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 2

Abstract

The major cause of earthquake damage to an embankment is the liquefaction of the soil foundation that induces ground-level deformations. The aim of this paper is to assess numerically the effect of the liquefaction-induced settlement of the soil foundation on a levee due to real earthquakes. The seismic vulnerability is evaluated in terms of analytical fragility curves constructed on the basis of nonlinear dynamic finite-element (FE) analysis. However, FE analysis can be expensive because of the very large number of simulations needed for an accurate assessment of the system failure behavior. This problem is addressed by building a Gaussian process (GP) emulator to represent the output of the expensive FE model. A comparison with the FE reference results suggests that the proposed GP model works well and can be successfully used as a predictive tool to compute the induced damage on the levee. Findings also illustrate clearly the importance and the advantages of an adequate definition of the input parameters to build the GP model.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work, within the SINAPS@ project, benefited from French state funding managed by the National Research Agency under program RNSR Future Investments bearing reference No. ANR-11-RSNR-0022-04. The research reported in this paper has been supported in part by the SEISM Paris Saclay Research Institute. The authors acknowledge accessing strong motion data through the Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD), last visited on Aug 2017. The networks or agencies providing the data used in this report are the California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (CSMIP) and the USGS National Strong Motion Project (NSMP).

References

Ancheta, T. D., et al. (2013). “PEER NGA-West2 database.”, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Aoi, S., Obara, K., Hori, S., Kasahara, K., and Okada, Y. (2000). “New Japanese uphole-downhole strong-motion observation network: KiK-net.” Seismol. Res. Lett., 72, 239.
Aubry, D., Chouvet, D., Modaressi, A., and Modaressi, H. (1986). “GEFDyn: Logiciel d’Analyse de Comportement Mécanique des Sols par Eléments Finis avec Prise en Compte du Couplage Sol-Eau-Air.” Manuel scientifique, Ecole Centrale Paris, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Aubry, D., Hujeux, J.-C., Lassoudière, F., and Meimon, Y. (1982). “A double memory model with multiple mechanisms for cyclic soil behaviour.” Int. Symp. on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, A.A. Balkema, Zurich, Switzerland, 3–13.
Aubry, D., and Modaressi, A. (1996). “GEFDyn.” Manuel scientifique, Ecole Centrale Paris, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2008a). “Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation.” Struct. Saf., 30(3), 236–252.
Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2008b). “Vector-valued intensity measures incorporating spectral shape for prediction of structural response.” J. Earthquake Eng., 12(4), 534–554.
Bucher, C., and Most, T. (2008). “A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 23(2–3), 154–163.
Byrne, P. M., Park, S.-S., Beaty, M., Sharp, M., Gonzalez, L., and Abdoun, T. (2004). “Numerical modeling of liquefaction and comparison with centrifuge tests.” Can. Geotech. J., 41(2), 193–211.
Cardoso, J. B., de Almeida, J. R., Dias, J. M., and Coelho, P. G. (2008). “Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks.” Adv. Eng. Software, 39(6), 505–513.
Diazdelao, F. A., Adhikari, S., Saavedra Flores, E. I., and Friswell, M. I. (2013). “Stochastic structural dynamic analysis using Bayesian emulators.” Comput. Struct., 120(1), 24–32.
Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., and Deheeger, F. (2013). “Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 33(1), 47–57.
Ferrario, E., Pedroni, N., Zio, E., and Lopez-Caballero, F. (2017). “Bootstrapped artificial neural networks for the seismic analysis of structural systems.” Struct. Saf., 67(1), 70–84.
Genton, M. G. (2001). “Classes of kernels for machine learning: A statistics perspective.” J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2(1), 299–312.
Ghosh, J., Padgett, J. E., and Dueñas-Osorio, L. (2013). “Surrogate modeling and failure surface visualization for efficient seismic vulnerability assessment of highway bridges.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 34(1), 189–199.
Gidaris, I., Taflanidis, A. A., and Mavroeidis, G. P. (2015). “Kriging metamodeling in seismic risk assessment based on stochastic ground motion models.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44(14), 2377–2399.
Iooss, B., Boussouf, L., Feuillard, V., and Marrel, A. (2010). “Numerical studies of the metamodel fitting and validation processes.” Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. IARIA, 3, 11–21.
Juang, C. H., Yuan, H., Li, D. K., Yang, S. H., and Christopher, R. A. (2005). “Estimating severity of liquefaction-induced damage near foundation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 25(5), 403–411.
Kawase, H. (2011). “Strong motion characteristics and their damage impact to structures during the off Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake of March 11, 2011; How extraordinary was this M9.0 earthquake?” 4th IASPEI/IAEE Int. Symp. on Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Univ. of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
Kayen, R. E., and Mitchell, J. K. (1997). “Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1162–1174.
Koutsourelakis, S., Prévost, J. H., and Deodatis, G. (2002). “Risk assessment of an interacting structure-soil system due to liquefaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(4), 851–879.
Lancieri, M., Renault, M., Berge-Thierry, C., Gueguen, P., Baumont, D., and Perrault, M. (2015). “Strategy for the selection of input ground motion for inelastic structural response analysis based on naïve Bayesian classifier.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 13(9), 2517–2546.
Lopez-Caballero, F., and Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A. (2008). “Numerical simulation of liquefaction effects on seismic SSI.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 28(2), 85–98.
Lopez-Caballero, F., and Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A. (2010). “Assessment of variability and uncertainties effects on the seismic response of a liquefiable soil profile.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 30(7), 600–613.
Luco, N., and Cornell, C. A. (2007). “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 357–392.
Matsuo, O. (1996). “Damage to river dikes.” Soils Found., 36, 235–240.
Modaressi, H., and Benzenati, I. (1994). “Paraxial approximation for poroelastic media.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 13(2), 117–129.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). State of the art and practice in the assessment of earthquake-induced soil liquefaction and its consequences, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Oka, F., Tsai, P., Kimoto, S., and Kato, R. (2012). “Damage patterns of river embankments due to the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake and a numerical modeling of the deformation of river embankments with a clayey subsoil layer.” Soils Found., 52(5), 890–909.
Okamura, M., Tamamura, S., and Yamamoto, R. (2013). “Seismic stability of embankments subjected to pre-deformation due to foundation consolidation.” Soils Found., 53(1), 11–22.
Ozutsumi, O., Sawada, S., Iai, S., Takeshima, Y., Sugiyama, W., and Shimazu, T. (2002). “Effective stress analyses of liquefaction-induced deformation in river dikes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 22(9–12), 1075–1082.
Popescu, R., Prévost, J. H., Deodatis, G., and Chakrabortty, P. (2006). “Dynamics of nonlinear porous media with applications to soil liquefaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(6–7), 648–665.
Porter, K. A. (2003). “An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rapti, I., Lopez-Caballero, F., Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A., Foucault, A., and Voldoire, F. (2018). “Liquefaction analysis and damage evaluation of embankment-type structures.” Acta Geotech., in press.
Rasmussen, C. E., and Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., and Deville, Y. (2012). “DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based metamodeling and optimization.” J. Stat. Software, 51(1), 1–55.
Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Mitchell, T. J., and Wynn, H. P. (1989). “Design and analysis of computer experiments.” Stat. Sci., 4(4), 409–423.
Saez, E., Lopez-Caballero, F., and Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi, A. (2011). “Effect of the inelastic dynamic soil-structure interaction on the seismic vulnerability assessment.” Struct. Saf., 33(1), 51–63.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(SM9), 1249–1273.
Seo, J., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J. I., and Goodno, B. J. (2012). “Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events.” Eng. Struct., 45(1), 585–597.
Seyedi, D. M., Gehl, P., Douglas, J., Davenne, L., Mezher, N., and Ghavamian, S. (2010). “Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means of nonlinear time-history analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(1), 91–108.
Sharp, M. K., and Adalier, K. (2006). “Seismic response of earth dam with varying depth of liquefiable foundation layer.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(11), 1028–1037.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T. (2000). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech., 1224–1231.
Stern, R., Song, J., and Work, D. (2017). “Accelerated Monte Carlo system reliability analysis through machine-learning-based surrogate models of network connectivity.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 164(1), 1–9.
Strong, M., and Oakley, J. E. (2014). “When is a model good enough? Deriving the expected value of model improvement via specifying internal model discrepancies.” SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantif., 2(1), 106–125.
Swaisgood, J. R. (2003). “Embankment dam deformation caused by earthquakes.” PCEE 2003: Proc., 7th Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.
Toal, D. J. J., Bressloff, N. W., and Keane, A. J. (2008). “Kriging hyperparameter tuning strategies.” AIAA J., 46(5), 1240–1252.
Unjoh, S., Kaneko, M., Kataoka, S., Nagaya, K., and Matsuoka, K. (2012). “Effect of earthquake ground motions on soil liquefaction.” Soils Found., 52(5), 830–841.
Zentner, I. (2010). “Numerical computation of fragility curves for NPP equipment.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 240(6), 1614–1621.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., and Shiomi, T. (1984). “Dynamic behaviour of saturated porous media; the generalised Biot formulation and its numerical solution.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 8(1), 71–96.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4Issue 2June 2018

History

Received: May 4, 2017
Accepted: Oct 18, 2017
Published online: Feb 14, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fernando Lopez-Caballero, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Mechanics of Soils, Structures and Materials, Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 8579, CentraleSupélec Paris-Saclay Univ., 3 Rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Christina Khalil, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate, Mechanics of Soils, Structures and Materials, Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 8579, CentraleSupélec Paris-Saclay Univ., 3 Rue Joliot-Curie, 91190 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share