Technical Papers
Dec 8, 2017

Buffer Sizing Model Incorporating Fuzzy Risk Assessment: Case Study on Concrete Gravity Dam and Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 1

Abstract

Timely completion of dam and hydroelectric power plant (HEPP) projects is indispensable for the countries constructing them due to their economic, political, and social impacts. Robust and stable schedules should be created at the beginning of these projects in order to realistically estimate project durations considering uncertainties and variations. This paper proposes a buffer sizing methodology based on fuzzy risk assessment which can be used to calculate time buffers accurately for concrete gravity dam and HEPP projects by considering the vulnerability of activities to various risk factors as well as their interdependencies. A generic schedule is developed and 89 potential causes of delay/risk factors are identified for the concrete gravity dam and HEPP projects. Risk assessment is conducted at the activity level. The inputs of the model are frequency and severity of risk factors, and the output is estimated time buffer as a percentage of original duration. Implementation of the model is illustrated by an example project. Results show that outputs of the model can be used for scheduling, estimation of time buffers, and risk management of concrete gravity dam and HEPP projects. Although the model and its outputs are specific for concrete gravity dams, the buffer sizing methodology based on fuzzy risk assessment can easily be adapted to other types of construction projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that significantly improved the quality of this paper.

References

Assaf, A. S., Al-Khalil, M., and Al-Hazmi, M. (1995). “Causes of delay in large building construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng., 45–50.
Aven, T. (2016). “Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 253(1), 1–13.
Ballard, G., and Howell, G. (1995). “Toward construction JIT.” Proc., 1995 ARCOM Conf., Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM, Sheffield, U.K.
Chua, D. K. H., and Shen, L. J. (2001). “Constraint modeling and buffer management with integrated production scheduler.” Proc., IGLC-9, 9th Annual Conf. of the Int. Group for Lean Construction, National Univ. of Singapore, Singapore.
El Razek, M. E., Bassioni, H. A., and Mobarak, A. M. (2008). “Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 831–841.
Farag, M. A. M. (2010). “An integration of a buffering assessment model using fuzzy logic with lean management for improving highway construction process.” Ph.D. dissertation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Frimpong, Y., Oluwoye, J., and Crawford, L. (2003). “Causes of delay and cost overruns in construction of groundwater projects in a developing countries: Ghana as a case study.” Int. J. Project Manage., 21(5), 321–326.
Ghaziani, A. (2012). “A fuzzy delay assessment tool for construction projects.” Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, Turkey.
Ghoddosi, P., Hosseinalipour, M., and Jalal, M. P. (2008). “Fuzzy assessment of causes of time overrun (delays) in Iran’s dam construction projects.” J. Appl. Sci., 8(19), 3423–3430.
Goldratt, E. M. (1997). Critical chain, The North River Press, New York.
Gonzalez, V., Rischmoller, L., and Alarcon, L. F. (2004). “Design of buffers in repetitive projects: Using production management theory and IT tools.” Proc., 4th Int. Postgraduate Research Conf., Univ. of Salford, Manchester, U.K.
Gündüz, M., Nielsen, Y., and Özdemir, M. (2013). “Quantification of delay factors using the relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey.” J. Manage. Eng., 133–139.
Hopp, W. J., and Spearman, M. L. (2008). Factory physics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Horman, M. J., and Thomas, H. R. (2005). “Role of inventory buffers in construction labor performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 834–843.
Jaskowski, P., and Biruk, S. (2010). “Buffer sizing method for construction stable schedules with duration constraints.” J. Civ. Eng. Archit., 4(10), 24–30.
Kazaz, A., Ulubeyli, S., and Tuncbilekli, N. A. (2012). “Causes of delays in construction projects in Turkey.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 18(3), 426–435.
Kim, J., Lee, H., Park, M., and Ryu, H. (2006). “Assignment buffer control for construction projects.” Proc., 23rd ISARC, Japan Robot Association, Tokyo, 872–877.
Ko, C. H., and Chen, Y. C. (2012). “Evaluating production time buffer for precast fabrication.” J. Eng. Project Prod. Manage., 2(2), 101–111.
Leach, L. P. (2005). Critical chain project management, Artech House, London.
Luong, L. D., and Ohsato, A. (2008). “Fuzzy critical chain method for project scheduling under resource constraints and uncertainty.” Int. J. Project Manage., 26(6), 688–698.
Malek, M. (2000). “An application of fuzzy modeling in construction engineering.” Proc., 36th Annual Int. Conf. of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN, 287–300.
Mamdani, E. H., and Assilian, S. (1975). “An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller.” Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 7(1), 1–13.
Mansfield, N. R., Ugwu, O. O., and Daran, T. (1994). “Causes of delay and cost overruns in Nigerian construction projects.” Int. J. Project Manage., 12(4), 254–260.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Microsoft Project [Computer software]. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA.
Newbold, R. C. (1998). Project management in the fast lane: Applying the theory of constraints, St. Lucie Press, New York.
Odeh, A. M., and Battaineh, H. T. (2002). “Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage., 20(1), 67–73.
Park, M., and Pena-Mora, F. (2004). “Reliability buffering for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 626–637.
Russell, M. M., Howell, G., Hsiang, S. M., and Liu, M. (2013). “Application of time buffers to construction project task durations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013008.
Sambasivan, M., and Soon, Y. W. (2007). “Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry.” Int. J. Project Manage., 25(5), 517–526.
Shou, Y., and Yeo, K. T. (2000). “Estimation of project buffers in critical chain project management.” Proc., 2000 IEEE Int. Conf., Management of Innovation and Technology, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 162–167.
Siddhappa, K. R., Konnur, B. A., and Landage, A. B. (2016). “Risk analysis of construction projects using fuzzy logic.” Int. J. Eng. Res., 5(1), 274–276.
Simulink [Computer software]. MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
Tukel, O. I., Rom, W. O., and Eksioglu, S. D. (2006). “An investigation of buffer sizing techniques in critical chain scheduling.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 172(2), 401–416.
Venkatesh, M. P., Renuka, S. M., and Umarani, C. (2012). “Causes of delay in Indian construction industry.” Appl. Mech. Mater., 174–177, 2768–2773.
Vonder, S. V., Demeulemeester, E., Herroelen, W., and Leus, R. (2005). “The use of buffers in project management: The trade-off between stability and makespan.” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 97(2), 227–240.
Wambeke, B. W., Hsiang, S., and Liu, M. (2011). “Causes of variation in construction project task starting times and duration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 663–677.
WCD (World Commission on Dams). (2000). “Dams and development, a new framework for decision making.” Earthscan Publications, London.
Yen, J., and Langari, R. (1999). Fuzzy logic: Intelligence, control, and information, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Zadeh, L. A. (1973). “Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex system and decision processes.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., SMC-3(1), 28–44.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4Issue 1March 2018

History

Received: Jun 13, 2017
Accepted: Aug 16, 2017
Published online: Dec 8, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 8, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Semsettin Balta [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06531, Turkey (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
M. Talat Birgonul [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06531, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Irem Dikmen [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara 06531, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share