TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 7, 2010

Prioritizing Sustainability Criteria in Urban Planning Processes: Methodology Application

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 137, Issue 1

Abstract

Since the beginning of the sustainability debate approximately 20 years ago, all parties involved in the urban planning process have been expected to devise sustainable solutions to meet the challenges of the 21st century. Potential to include sustainability criteria is present in the strategic planning stage and during the initial studies of a project. However, instruments available at these early stages are rare and show numerous weaknesses. The present study intends to close this gap by developing an instrument for the prioritization of sustainability criteria in urban planning processes. It is based on the Sustainable Building Tool 07 (SBTool 07), a comprehensive and well-established tool for the assessment of sustainability of construction projects, key issues pertaining to the initial planning stages are identified via a materiality matrix—a method established for corporate sustainability reporting. The resulting method has been tested in a competition in the Icelandic city of Reykjavík. Results include a materiality matrix on stakeholder priorities and the relevance of criteria to sustainability across the life cycle as well as a core set of 19 criteria to be addressed in Reykjavík.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks to all of the partners who were involved in the administration of the competition, especially Klaus E. Krauss of Cologne, Lützow7 Landschaftsarchitekten of Berlin and Verkehrsplanung Link of Stuttgart. Our thanks also go to the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript, whose suggestions helped us improve it substantially. Further, we thank the City of Reykjavík for the permission to publish Fig. 1. The assistance of Liliana Wild, Brigitte Cuperus and Nathan Barnhart in the preparation of the manuscript is greatly appreciated.

References

Baum, H. S. (2003). “Community and consensus: Reality and fantasy in planning.” Readings in planning theory, S. Campbell and S. S. Fainstein, eds., Blackwell, Malden, MA, 275–295.
Baycan-Levent, T., and Nijkamp, P. (2009). “Planning and management of urban green spaces in Europe: Comparative analysis.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 135(1), 1–12.
Birkeland, J. (2005). Design for sustainability: A sourcebook of integrated eco-logical solutions, Earthscan Publications, London.
Brearley, S., and Curry, C. (2006). “The Freeport regional water project—from public conflict to consent.” Operations Management Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA, 111–118.
Brebbia, C. A., Ferrante, A., Rodriguez, M., and Terra, B. (2000). “The sustainable city: Urban regeneration and sustainability.” Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on the Sustainable City, Wessex Institute of Technology Press, Wessex, UK.
Campbell, S. (2003). “Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development.” Readings in planning theory, S. Campbell and S. S. Fainstein, eds., Blackwell, Malden, MA, 435–458.
Cullingworth, B., and Caves, R. W. (2003). Planning in the USA. Policies, issues and processes, Routledge, London, 20.
Daigger, G. T. (2007). “Wastewater management in the 21st century.” J. Environ. Eng., 133(7), 671–680.
E.on AG. (2008). “Corporate responsibility 2007: Part of the problem or part of the solution? Addressing our energy challenges.” 〈http://www.eon.com/en/downloads/E.ON_CR_US.pdf〉 (Feb. 7, 2009).
Ford Motor Company. (2007). “Blueprint for Sustainability: 2007/8 Sustainability Report.” 〈http://www.ford.com/doc/sr07-ford-sustainability.pdf〉 (Jan. 8, 2010).
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach, Pitman, Boston.
GE. (2010). “GE citizenship—Priorities & engagement: GE citizenship matrix.” 〈http://www.ge.com/citizenship/priorities_engagement/index.jsp#/matrix〉 (Jan. 8, 2010).
Geirsson, Á., ed. (2007). Vatnsmýri, Reykjavík. A call for ideas, Reykjavík, City of Reykjavík.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2007). “G3 guidelines,” 〈http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/G3Guidelines/〉 (Feb. 6, 2009).
Henry, E., and Paris, M. (2009). “Institutional dynamics and barriers to sustainable construction in France, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.” Sustainable urban development. Changing professional practice, M. Symes and I. Cooper, eds., Routledge, London, 171–196.
Hermelin, B. (2009). “Spatial strategic planning in the Stockholm region. Discourses on the space-economy and growth factors.” Eur. Plan. Stud., 17(1), 131–148.
Hoffman, A. J., and Henn, R. (2008). “Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building.” Organ. Environ., 21(4), 390–419.
Holcim Group. (2008). “Corporate sustainable development report 2007.” 〈http://www.holcim.com/gc/CORP/uploads/Holcim_Corporate_SD_Report_2007.pdf〉 (Feb. 7, 2009).
Howard, T. L. J., and Gaborit, N. (2007). “Using virtual environment technology to improve public participation in urban planning process.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 133(4), 233–241.
Intel Corporation. (2009). “2008 Corporate Responsibility Report: What can we make possible?” 〈http://download.intel.com/intel/cr/gcr/pdf/Intel_CSR_Report_2008.pdf〉 (Jan. 8, 2010).
International Initiative for a Sustainable Built Environment (iiSBE). (1996-2007). “SBTool07.”
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., and Whittington, R. (2006). Exploring corporate strategy, Pearson, Harlow, UK.
Juan, Y.-K., Kim, J. H., Roper, K., and Castro-Lacouture, D. (2009). “GA-based decision support system for housing condition assessment and refurbishment strategies.” Autom. Constr., 18(4), 394–401.
Junnila, S., Horvath, A., and Guggemos, A. A. (2006). “Life-cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(1), 10–17.
Kassab, M., Hipel, K., and Hegazy, T. (2006). “Conflict resolution in construction disputes using the graph model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(10), 1043–1052.
Lafferty, W. M. (2006). Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Lee, G. K. L., and Chan, E. H. W. (2008). “Factors affecting urban renewal in high-density city: Case study of Hong Kong.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 134(3), 140–148.
Loorbach, D., and Rotmans, J. (2006). “Managing transitions for sustainable development.” Environ. Policy, 44, 187–206.
Maclaren, V. W. (1996). “Urban sustainability reporting.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 62(2), 184–202.
Martin, M. (2008). “Drei neue Werkzeuge.” TEC21, 134(49/50), 31–33 (in German).
Meins, E., Wallbaum, H., Hardziewski, R., and Feige, A. (2010). “Sustainability and property valuation: A risk-based approach.” Build. Res. Inf., 38(3), 281–301.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis, Island, Washington, DC.
Miller, J. S., Hoel, L. A., Dalton, F. T., and McCray, D. R. (2008). “Linking transportation planning to program implementation.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 134(2), 88–95.
Nemry, F., and Uihlein, A. (2008). “Environmental improvement potentials of residential buildings (IMPRO-Building).” European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Luxembourg.
Norman, J., MacLean, H. L., and Kennedy, C. A. (2006). “Comparing high and low residential density: Life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 132(1), 10–21.
Nunn, S. (2004). “Public and private built investment in the new economy: Exploring regional differences, 1990–2000.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 130(3), 125–132.
Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H. S. (2002). “Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of U.S. residential buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(4), 132–138.
O’Connor, M., and Spangenberg, J. H. (2008). “A methodology for CSR reporting: Assuring a representative diversity of indicators across stakeholders, scales, sites and performance issues.” J. Cleaner Prod., 16(13), 1399–1415.
Oreszczyn, S., and Lane, A. (2000). “The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: Different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management.” J. Environ. Manage., 60(1), 101–118.
Roloff, J. (2008). “Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focussed stakeholder management.” J. Bus. Ethics, 82(1), 233–250.
Sanders, S. R., and Eskridge, W. F. (1993). “Managing implementation of change.” J. Manage. Eng., 9(4), 365–381.
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., and Blair, J. D. (1991). “Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders.” Acad. Manage. Exec., 5(2), 61–75.
Seiss, R. (2007). Wer baut Wien? Verlag Anton Pustet Salzburg, Munich (in German).
Sharrard, A. L., Matthews, H. S., and Ries, R. J. (2008). “Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 14(4), 327–336.
Steemers, K., and Manchanda, S. (2010). “Energy efficient design and occupant well-being: Case studies in the UK and India.” Build. Environ., 45(2), 270–278.
Swiss Society of Engineers and Architects (SIA). (2004). Dokumentation SIA D 0200 SNARC – Systematik zur Beurteilung der Nachhaltigkeit von Architekturprojekten für den Bereich Umwelt, Zurich, Switzerland (in German).
Tam, C. M., Zeng, S. X., and Tong, T. K. L. (2009). “Conflict analysis in public engagement program of urban planning in Hong Kong.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 135(2), 51–55.
Tiwari, P. (2003). “Sustainable practices to meet shelter needs in India.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 129(2), 65–83.
Tseng, C.-M., Fang, W.-T., Chen, C.-T., and Loh, K. D. (2009). “Case study of environmental performance assessment for regional resource management in Taiwan.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 135(3), 125–131.
Wallbaum, H. (2008). “Sustainability indicators for the built environment—The challenges ahead.” World Sustainable Building Conf., G. Foliente, T. Luetzkendorf, P. Paevere, eds., CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 1292–1298.
Warszawski, A. (2003). “Analysis of costs and benefits of tall buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129(4), 421–430.
Welford, R., Chan, C., and Man, M. (2007). “Priorities for corporate social responsibility: A survey of businesses and their stakeholders.” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 15(1), 56–62.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future, United Nations, New York.
World Resources Institute (WRI). (2003). World resources 2002–2004: Decisions for the earth, Washington, DC.
Yeang, K. (2006). Ecodesign: A manual for ecological design, Wiley, Sussex, UK.
Ziara, M. M., and Ayyub, B. M. (1999). “Decision analysis for housing-project development.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 125(3), 68–85.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 137Issue 1March 2011
Pages: 20 - 28

History

Received: Mar 27, 2009
Accepted: Apr 12, 2010
Published online: May 7, 2010
Published in print: Mar 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Holger Wallbaum [email protected]
Chair of Sustainable Construction, Institute of Construction and Infrastructure Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 15, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Sabrina Krank [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Chair of Sustainable Construction, Institute of Construction and Infrastructure Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 15, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Founder and Principal, Urban Essences–Architecture and City Planning, Sophienstrasse 17, 10178 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share