Technical Papers
Aug 28, 2019

Removal of Multiple Metallic Species from Sludge by Electromigration

Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24, Issue 1

Abstract

The treatment of runoff waters from a lignite mine and a power plant generated a sludge heavily polluted with metals. Electromigration laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of this technology for the removal of metals from the sludge. The experimental results proved that the mobilization of heavy metals could be achieved by the acidification of the sludge. The electro-oxidation of water in the anode can be used as a source of H+ to mobilize the metals transported toward the cathode. The suppression of OH generation at the cathode by the controlled addition of nitric or sulfuric acid increased the electric conductivity of the sludge specimen and the electric current intensity. The increase in the current intensity in the electrokinetic cell resulted in more H+ ions electrogenerated at the anode, favoring mobilization of the metals by the direct attack of the H+ ions. The electrokinetic tests proved that acid pH in the cathode resulted in higher electric current intensity and faster metal mobilization and removal, but the energy consumption sharply increased. A trade-off occurred among metal removal, energy consumption, and the pH in the catholyte. The best results were achieved by using sulfuric acid to control the pH in the catholyte at 4. The average metal removal was: Fe 27%, Ca 68%, Mg 24%, Na 25%, Mn 68%, Sr 33%, Zn 60%, and Cu 60%. Other elements such as Al, K, Ti, and Zr associated with the crystalline structure of minerals were not affected by the electrokinetic treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (sludge characteristics, metal concentrations in sludge before and after the treatments, test conditions, and experimental setup).

References

ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM D2974. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019a. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by Mass. ASTM D2216. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019b. Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM D4972. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cameselle, C. 2015. “Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil.” Electrochim. Acta 181: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.191.
Cameselle, C., and A. Pena. 2016. “Enhanced electromigration and electro-osmosis for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with multiple heavy metals.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 104: 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.09.002.
Cameselle, C., M. T. Ricart, M. J. Núñez, and J. M. Lema. 2003. “Iron removal from kaolin. Comparison between “in situ” and “two-stage” bioleaching processes.” Hydrometallurgy 68 (1–3): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00196-2.
Colacicco, A., G. De Gioannis, A. Muntoni, E. Pettinao, A. Polettini, and R. Pomi. 2010. “Enhanced electrokinetic treatment of marine sediments contaminated by heavy metals and PAHs.” Chemosphere 81 (1): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.004.
Figueroa, A., C. Cameselle, S. Gouveia, and H. K. Hansen. 2016. “Electrokinetic treatment of an agricultural soil contaminated with heavy metals.” J. Environ. Sci. Health A 51 (9): 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1170425.
Hansen, H. K., L. M. Ottosen, B. K. Kliem, and A. Villumsen. 1997. “Electrodialytic remediation of soils polluted with Cu, Cr, Hg, Pb and Zn.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 70 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199709)70:1%3C67::AID-JCTB662%3E3.0.CO;2-V.
Kim, K. J., D. H. Kim, J. C. Yoo, and K. Baek. 2011. “Electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from dredged marine sediment.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 79 (2): 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.010.
Merdoud, O., C. Cameselle, M. O. Boulakradeche, and D. E. Akretche. 2016. “Removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil by electrodialytic remediation enhanced with organic acids.” Environ. Sci. Process. Impact 18 (11): 1440–1448. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00380J.
Ottosen, L. M., H. K. Hansen, and P. E. Jensen. 2009. “Electrokinetic removal of heavy metals.” In Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater, edited by K. R. Reddy and C. Cameselle, 95–126. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Pamukcu, S., and J. K. Wittle. 1992. “Electrokinetic removal of selected heavy metals from soil.” Environ. Prog. 11 (3): 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670110323.
Pedersen, K. B., P. E. Jensen, L. M. Ottosen, and J. Barlindhaug. 2019. “Applying multivariate analysis for optimising the electrodialytic removal of Cu and Pb from shooting range soils.” J. Hazard. Mater. 368: 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.014.
Reddy, K. R., and P. R. Ala. 2005. “Electrokinetic remediation of metal-contaminated field soil.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 40 (8): 1701–1720. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200059606.
Reddy, K. R., and C. Cameselle. 2009. “Overview of electrochemical remediation technologies.” In Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater, edited by K. R. Reddy and C. Cameselle, 1–28. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ricart, M. T., C. Cameselle, T. Lucas, and J. M. Lema. 1999. “Manganese removal from spiked kaolinitic soil and sludge by electromigration.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 34 (16): 3227–3241. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-100100832.
Ricart, M. T., H. K. Hansen, C. Cameselle, and J. M. Lema. 2004. “Electrochemical treatment of a polluted sludge: Different methods and conditions for manganese removal.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 39 (15): 3679–3689. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200040079.
USEPA. 1992. Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 1996. Method 3050B. Acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Yang, J.-S., M. J. Kwon, J. Choi, K. Baek, and E. J. O’Loughlin. 2014. “The transport behavior of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn during electrokinetic remediation of a contaminated soil using electrolyte conditioning.” Chemosphere 117: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.079.
Zhang, T., H. Zou, M. Ji, X. Li, L. Li, and T. Tang. 2014. “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21 (4): 3126–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2274-9.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24Issue 1January 2020

History

Received: Feb 6, 2019
Accepted: Jun 18, 2019
Published online: Aug 28, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, BiotecnIA, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Univ. of Vigo, Rua Maxwell s/n, Building Fundicion, Vigo 36310, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4785-1585. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, BiotecnIA, Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Univ. of Vigo, Rua Maxwell s/n, Building Fundicion, Vigo 36310, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-3228. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share