Removal of Multiple Metallic Species from Sludge by Electromigration
Publication: Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
Volume 24, Issue 1
Abstract
The treatment of runoff waters from a lignite mine and a power plant generated a sludge heavily polluted with metals. Electromigration laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the feasibility of this technology for the removal of metals from the sludge. The experimental results proved that the mobilization of heavy metals could be achieved by the acidification of the sludge. The electro-oxidation of water in the anode can be used as a source of to mobilize the metals transported toward the cathode. The suppression of generation at the cathode by the controlled addition of nitric or sulfuric acid increased the electric conductivity of the sludge specimen and the electric current intensity. The increase in the current intensity in the electrokinetic cell resulted in more ions electrogenerated at the anode, favoring mobilization of the metals by the direct attack of the ions. The electrokinetic tests proved that acid pH in the cathode resulted in higher electric current intensity and faster metal mobilization and removal, but the energy consumption sharply increased. A trade-off occurred among metal removal, energy consumption, and the pH in the catholyte. The best results were achieved by using sulfuric acid to control the pH in the catholyte at 4. The average metal removal was: Fe 27%, Ca 68%, Mg 24%, Na 25%, Mn 68%, Sr 33%, Zn 60%, and Cu 60%. Other elements such as Al, K, Ti, and Zr associated with the crystalline structure of minerals were not affected by the electrokinetic treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all of the data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request (sludge characteristics, metal concentrations in sludge before and after the treatments, test conditions, and experimental setup).
References
ASTM. 2006. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head). ASTM D2434. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM D422. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014a. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM D2974. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014b. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM D854. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019a. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by Mass. ASTM D2216. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019b. Standard test methods for pH of soils. ASTM D4972. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Cameselle, C. 2015. “Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil.” Electrochim. Acta 181: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.191.
Cameselle, C., and A. Pena. 2016. “Enhanced electromigration and electro-osmosis for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with multiple heavy metals.” Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 104: 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.09.002.
Cameselle, C., M. T. Ricart, M. J. Núñez, and J. M. Lema. 2003. “Iron removal from kaolin. Comparison between “in situ” and “two-stage” bioleaching processes.” Hydrometallurgy 68 (1–3): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(02)00196-2.
Colacicco, A., G. De Gioannis, A. Muntoni, E. Pettinao, A. Polettini, and R. Pomi. 2010. “Enhanced electrokinetic treatment of marine sediments contaminated by heavy metals and PAHs.” Chemosphere 81 (1): 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.004.
Figueroa, A., C. Cameselle, S. Gouveia, and H. K. Hansen. 2016. “Electrokinetic treatment of an agricultural soil contaminated with heavy metals.” J. Environ. Sci. Health A 51 (9): 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1170425.
Hansen, H. K., L. M. Ottosen, B. K. Kliem, and A. Villumsen. 1997. “Electrodialytic remediation of soils polluted with Cu, Cr, Hg, Pb and Zn.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 70 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199709)70:1%3C67::AID-JCTB662%3E3.0.CO;2-V.
Kim, K. J., D. H. Kim, J. C. Yoo, and K. Baek. 2011. “Electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from dredged marine sediment.” Sep. Purif. Technol. 79 (2): 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.010.
Merdoud, O., C. Cameselle, M. O. Boulakradeche, and D. E. Akretche. 2016. “Removal of heavy metals from a contaminated soil by electrodialytic remediation enhanced with organic acids.” Environ. Sci. Process. Impact 18 (11): 1440–1448. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EM00380J.
Ottosen, L. M., H. K. Hansen, and P. E. Jensen. 2009. “Electrokinetic removal of heavy metals.” In Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater, edited by K. R. Reddy and C. Cameselle, 95–126. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Pamukcu, S., and J. K. Wittle. 1992. “Electrokinetic removal of selected heavy metals from soil.” Environ. Prog. 11 (3): 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670110323.
Pedersen, K. B., P. E. Jensen, L. M. Ottosen, and J. Barlindhaug. 2019. “Applying multivariate analysis for optimising the electrodialytic removal of Cu and Pb from shooting range soils.” J. Hazard. Mater. 368: 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.014.
Reddy, K. R., and P. R. Ala. 2005. “Electrokinetic remediation of metal-contaminated field soil.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 40 (8): 1701–1720. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200059606.
Reddy, K. R., and C. Cameselle. 2009. “Overview of electrochemical remediation technologies.” In Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater, edited by K. R. Reddy and C. Cameselle, 1–28. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ricart, M. T., C. Cameselle, T. Lucas, and J. M. Lema. 1999. “Manganese removal from spiked kaolinitic soil and sludge by electromigration.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 34 (16): 3227–3241. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-100100832.
Ricart, M. T., H. K. Hansen, C. Cameselle, and J. M. Lema. 2004. “Electrochemical treatment of a polluted sludge: Different methods and conditions for manganese removal.” Sep. Sci. Technol. 39 (15): 3679–3689. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200040079.
USEPA. 1992. Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA. 1996. Method 3050B. Acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils. Washington, DC: USEPA.
Yang, J.-S., M. J. Kwon, J. Choi, K. Baek, and E. J. O’Loughlin. 2014. “The transport behavior of As, Cu, Pb, and Zn during electrokinetic remediation of a contaminated soil using electrolyte conditioning.” Chemosphere 117: 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.079.
Zhang, T., H. Zou, M. Ji, X. Li, L. Li, and T. Tang. 2014. “Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes.” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21 (4): 3126–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2274-9.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 6, 2019
Accepted: Jun 18, 2019
Published online: Aug 28, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jan 28, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.