Technical Papers
Oct 25, 2021

Unveiling Embedded Risks in Integrated Project Delivery

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 1

Abstract

Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is an innovative procurement approach through which the client, designer, and contractor work together under one contract as a team. While an integrated team is expected to be able to create extra value for the project, this practice may bring new risks if not all team members are committed. The slow uptake of IPD may possibly be due to the insufficient understanding of the risks involved, especially those hidden risks associated with inappropriate integration practice. This study identifies critical risks in IPD projects, and investigates if risk criticality can be alleviated by having previous or future partnership between IPD partners. By collecting the views of construction professionals on the level of criticality of general risks and IPD-specific risks, it is found that (1) most highly critical IPD project risks are borne from multidisciplinary teams of poor integration quality, inaccurate target costs, or unreasonable cost estimates; and (2) having future cooperation intent can significantly alleviate the criticality of certain IPD risks, whereas no effect of previous partnership was found on risk criticality. This study contributes to a growing body of knowledge on IPD by providing insight into the effect of new and general risks on IPD project outcomes in particular and clarifying the role of previous/future partnership in risk management. This study suggests active involvement of client and contractors in the design of IPD and signals future cooperation intent to IPD partners during the project process.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during the study is included in the published paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the supports provided by Hong Kong General Research Fund (9041988). The authors would further like to thank the survey participants for taking their time to share their valuable experience in this study. This work could not have been possible without their engagement. Also, special thanks are owed to Mr. David Umstot of Umstot Project and Facilities Solutions, LLC, for his assistance with the data collection.

References

Abdirad, H., and C. S. Dossick. 2019. “Restructuration of architectural practice in integrated project delivery (IPD): Two case studies.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (1): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0196.
AIA and AIA California Council. 2007. Integrated project delivery: A guide. Washington, DC: AIA.
Aldossari, K. M., B. C. Lines, J. B. Smithwick, K. C. Hurtado, and K. T. Sullivan. 2020. “Best practices of organizational change for adopting alternative project delivery methods in the AEC industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (4): 1060–1082. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0166.
Allison, M., H. Ashcraft, R. Cheng, S. Klawens, and J. Pease. 2018. Integrated project delivery: An action guide for leaders. McLean, VA: Center for Innovation in the Design and Charles Pankow Foundation.
APM (Association for Project Management). 2005. PRAM: Project risk analysis and management guide. Author (Edition 2). London: APM.
Arino, A. M., and J. J. Reuer. 2004. Alliance contractual design. Barcelona, Spain: IESE Business School.
Ashcraft, H. W. 2011a. IPD teams: Creation, organization and management. San Francisco: HansonBridgett.
Ashcraft, H. W. 2011b. Negotiating an integrated project delivery agreement. San Francisco: HansonBridgett.
Ashcraft, H. W. 2012. The IPD framework. San Francisco: HansonBridgett.
Azhar, S. 2011. “Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 11 (3): 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127.
Ballard, G. 2011. “The growing case for lean construction.” Constr. Res. Innov. 2 (4): 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/20450249.2011.11873820.
Ballard, G., B. Dilsworth, D. Do, W. Low, J. Mobley, P. Phillips, D. Reed, Z. Sargent, P. Tillmann, and N. Wood. 2015. “How to make shared risk and reward sustainable.” Lean Constr. J. 11 (2015): 25–33.
Barclay, P., and R. Willer. 2007. “Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans.” Proc. Biol. Sci. 274 (1610): 749–753. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0209.
Broome, J., and J. Perry. 2002. “How practitioners set share fractions in target cost contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00035-1.
Chan, A. P. C., J. F. Y. Yeung, C. C. P. Yu, S. Q. Wang, and Y. Ke. 2011. “Empirical study of risk assessment and allocation of public-private partnership projects in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (3): 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000049.
Chan, D. W. M., A. P. C. Chan, P. T. I. Lam, and J. H. L. Chan. 2010. “Exploring the key risks and risk mitigation measures for guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction.” Constr. Law J. 26 (5): 364–378.
Chapman, R. J. 2001. “The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (3): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00070-8.
Charoenngam, C., and C.-Y. Yeh. 1999. “Contractual risk and liability sharing in hydropower construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 17 (1): 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00064-1.
Cheng, R. 2012. IPD case studies. Washington, DC: AIA.
Cheng, R. 2016. Motivation and means: How and why IPD and lean lead to success. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota.
Choi, J., S. Yun, F. Leite, and S. P. Mulva. 2019. “Team integration and owner satisfaction: Comparing integrated project delivery with construction management at risk in health care projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 5018014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000654.
Cohen, J. 2010. Integrated project delivery: Case studies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Darrington, J. 2010. “Addressing human motivation in construction contracts.” Calif. Constr. 40 (2): 18–19.
Das, T. K., and B. S. Teng. 1996. “Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures.” J. Manage. Stud. 33 (6): 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00174.x.
Das, T. K., and B. S. Teng. 2001a. “A risk perception model of alliance structuring.” J. Int. Manage. 7 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(00)00037-5.
Das, T. K., and B. S. Teng. 2001b. “Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework.” Organ. Stud. 22 (2): 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222004.
Davis, P., and P. Love. 2011. “Alliance contracting: Adding value through relationship development.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 18 (5): 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981111165167.
Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development. 2015. National alliance contracting guidelines: Guide to alliance contracting. Canberra, Australia: Dept. of Infrastructure and Regional.
Durdyev, S., M. R. Hosseini, I. Martek, S. Ismail, and M. Arashpour. 2019. “Barriers to the use of integrated project delivery (IPD): A quantified model for Malaysia.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 27 (1): 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0535.
Ebrahimi, G., and H. Dowlatabadi. 2019. “Perceived challenges in implementing integrated project delivery (IPD): Insights from stakeholders in the US and Canada for a path forward.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 15 (4): 291–314.
El-adaway, I., I. Abotaleb, and S. Eteifa. 2017. “Framework for multiparty relational contracting.” J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (3): 4517018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000238.
Elghaish, F., S. Abrishami, M. R. Hosseini, and S. Abu-Samra. 2020. “Revolutionising cost structure for integrated project delivery: A BIM-based solution.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 28 (4): 1214–1240. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2019-0222.
El-Sayegh, S. M. 2008. “Risk assessment and allocation in the UAE construction industry.” Int. J. Project Manage. 26 (4): 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.004.
Ey, W., J. Zuo, and S. Han. 2014. “Barriers and challenges of collaborative procurements: An exploratory study.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 14 (3): 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2014.922725.
Fan, W., and Z. Yan. 2010. “Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 26 (2): 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015.
Fidan, G., I. Dikmen, A. M. Tanyer, and M. T. Birgonul. 2011. “Ontology for relating risk and vulnerability to cost overrun in international projects.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000090.
Fink, A. 2003. Vol. 7 of How to sample in surveys. New York: SAGE.
Flanagan, R. 1993. Risk management and construction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
Franz, B., R. Leicht, K. Molenaar, and J. Messner. 2017. “Impact of team integration and group cohesion on project delivery performance.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (1): 4016088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001219.
Ghassemi, R., and B. Becerik-Gerber. 2011. “Transitioning to integrated project delivery: Potential barriers and lessons learned.” Lean Constr. J. 2011: 32–52.
Hamzeh, F., F. Rached, Y. Hraoui, A. J. Karam, Z. Malaeb, M. El Asmar, and Y. Abbas. 2019. “Integrated project delivery as an enabler for collaboration: A middle east perspective.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 9 (3): 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-05-2018-0084.
Heide, J. B., and A. S. Miner. 1992. “The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation.” Acad. Manage. J. 35 (2): 265–291.
Jepson, C., D. A. Asch, J. C. Hershey, and P. A. Ubel. 2005. “In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate.” J. Clin. Epidemiol. 58 (1): 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.004.
Kangari, R. 1995. “Risk management perceptions and trends of US construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 121 (4): 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:4(422).
Kendall, G., X. Yao, and S. Y. Chong. 2007. Vol. 4 of The iterated prisoners’ dilemma: 20 years on. Singapore: World Scientific.
Kent, D. C., and B. Becerik-Gerber. 2010. “Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000188.
Kerzner, H., and H. R. Kerzner. 2017. Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Koolwijk, J. S. J., C. J. van Oel, J. W. F. Wamelink, and R. Vrijhoef. 2018. “Collaboration and integration in project-based supply chains in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 4018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000592.
Kuchta, D. 2001. “Use of fuzzy numbers in project risk (criticality) assessment.” Int. J. Project Manage. 19 (5): 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00022-3.
Kurzban, R., M. N. Burton-Chellew, and S. A. West. 2015. “The evolution of altruism in humans.” Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66 (1): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015355.
Lahdenperä, P. 2012. “Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 30 (1): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.648947.
Laurent, J., and R. M. Leicht. 2019. “Practices for designing cross-functional teams for integrated project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 145 (3): 5019001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001605.
Lichtig, W. 2005. “Sutter health: Developing a contracting model to support lean project delivery.” Lean Constr. J. 2 (1): 105–112.
Manata, B., A. J. Garcia, S. Mollaoglu, and V. D. Miller. 2021. “The effect of commitment differentiation on integrated project delivery team dynamics: The critical roles of goal alignment, communication behaviors, and decision quality.” Int. J. Project Manage. 39 (3): 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.12.003.
Manu, E., N. Ankrah, E. Chinyio, and D. Proverbs. 2015. “Trust influencing factors in main contractor and subcontractor relationships during projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (7): 1495–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.006.
Matthews, O., and G. A. Howell. 2005. “Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting.” Lean Constr. J. 2 (1): 46–61.
Mesa, H. A., K. R. Molenaar, and L. F. Alarcón. 2016. “Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007.
Mesa, H. A., K. R. Molenaar, and L. F. Alarcón. 2019. “Comparative analysis between integrated project delivery and lean project delivery.” Int. J. Project Manage. 37 (3): 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.012.
Mosey, D. 2009. Early contractor involvement in building procurement: Contracts, partnering and project management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Paik, J., V. Miller, S. Mollaoglu, and W. Aaron Sun. 2017. “Interorganizational projects: Reexamining innovation implementation via IPD cases.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 4017017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000524.
Pellicer, E., M. A. Sanz, B. Esmaeili, and K. R. Molenaar. 2016. “Exploration of team integration in Spanish multifamily residential building construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 32 (5): 5016012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000438.
Petrovčič, A., G. Petrič, and K. L. Manfreda. 2016. “The effect of email invitation elements on response rate in a web survey within an online community.” Comput. Hum. Behav. 56 (2016): 320–329.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P. 2017. “Case studies on the role of integrated project delivery (IPD) approach on the establishment and promotion of trust.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 13 (2): 1–23.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and Y. J. Beliveau. 2016. “A schema of trust building attributes and their corresponding integrated project delivery traits.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 12 (2): 142–160.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and D. Srivastava. 2018. “Assessment of integrated project delivery (IPD) risk and reward sharing strategies from the standpoint of collaboration: A game theory approach.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018. Reston, VA: ASCE.
PMI (Project Management Institute). 2001. Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK GUIDE). Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Rekola, M., J. Kojima, and T. Mäkeläinen. 2010. “Towards integrated design and delivery solutions: Pinpointed challenges of process change.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 6 (4): 264–278.
Rezgui, Y., T. Beach, and O. Rana. 2013. “A governance approach for BIM management across lifecycle and supply chains using mixed-modes of information delivery.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 19 (2): 239–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.760480.
Saleh, A., and K. Bista. 2017. “Examining factors impacting online survey response rates in educational research: Perceptions of graduate students.” J. Multidiscip. Eval. 13 (29): 63–74.
Saxton, T. 1997. “The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes.” Acad. Manage. J. 40 (2): 443–461.
Sheehan, K. B. 2001. “E-mail survey response rates: A review.” J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 6 (2): JCMC621.
Sive, T. 2009. Integrated project delivery: Reality and promise a strategist’s guide to understanding and marketing IPD. Alexandria, VA: Society for Marketing Professional Services Foundation.
Son, J., and E. M. Rojas. 2011. “Evolution of collaboration in temporary project teams: An agent-based modeling and simulation approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (8): 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000331.
Street, W., N. Lieberman, and W. K. Muhlbauer. 2011. Construction management for industrial projects. Salem, MA: Scrivener Publishing.
Su, G., M. Hastak, X. Deng, and R. Khallaf. 2021. “Risk sharing strategies for IPD projects: Interactional analysis of participants’ decision-making.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (1): 4020101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000853.
Thomas, A. V., S. N. Kalidindi, and K. Ananthanarayanan. 2003. “Risk perception analysis of BOT road project participants in India.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 21 (4): 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000064127.
Thomsen, C., J. Darrington, D. Dunne, and W. Lichtig. 2009. Managing integrated project delivery. McLean, VA: Construction Management Association of America.
Walker, D., and S. Rowlinson. 2019. Routledge handbook of integrated project delivery. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Wang, S. Q., R. L. K. Tiong, S. K. Ting, and D. Ashley. 2000. “Evaluation and management of political risks in China’s BOT projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 126 (3): 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(242).
Wang, Y., Y. Chen, Y. Fu, and W. Zhang. 2017. “Do prior interactions breed cooperation in construction projects? The mediating role of contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (4): 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.019.
Whang, S.-W., K. S. Park, and S. Kim. 2019. “Critical success factors for implementing integrated construction project delivery.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (10): 2432–2446. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2019-0073.
Zou, P. X. W., G. Zhang, and J. Wang. 2007. “Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (6): 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.03.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 1January 2022

History

Received: Jun 4, 2021
Accepted: Sep 13, 2021
Published online: Oct 25, 2021
Published in print: Jan 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Qiuwen Ma, Ph.D. [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83, Tat Chee Rd., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Shan Li, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83, Tat Chee Rd., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City Univ. of Hong Kong, 83, Tat Chee Rd., Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-5192. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Risk–Reward Share Allocation under Different Integrated Project Delivery Relational Structures: A Monte-Carlo Simulation and Cooperative Game Theoretic Solutions Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13181, 150, 4, (2024).
  • Configuration Analysis of Integrated Project Delivery Principles’ Obstacle to Construction Project Level of Collaboration, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15043509, 15, 4, (3509), (2023).
  • Applicability of Integrated Project Delivery Principles Based on a Measurement Model in China, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15021592, 15, 2, (1592), (2023).
  • Optimum risk/reward sharing framework to incentivize integrated project delivery adoption, Construction Management and Economics, 10.1080/01446193.2023.2169316, (1-17), (2023).
  • Motivating Reliable Collaboration for Modular Construction: Shapley Value–Based Smart Contract, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5428, 39, 6, (2023).
  • Identifying Critical Risk Factors and Management Activities for Effective Offsite Construction Projects during Construction Phase, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5310, 39, 4, (2023).
  • Subcontractor trust issues on payment and valuation practices in UK private projects, Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 10.1108/JFMPC-07-2021-0048, 28, 1, (64-90), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share