Technical Papers
Aug 19, 2021

Resilience Criteria for Project Delivery Processes: An Exploratory Analysis for Highway Project Development

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Highway project delivery is a disruption-prone process in which resilience is essential to project success, because different project stages experience disruptions and struggle to reach desired project outcomes. A process to assess resilience in project delivery is necessary to be able to evaluate how a project may respond to disruptive events during the planning, design, and construction phases. Many practices in the literature can aid highway project delivery resilience through resistance, recovery, and adaptation. Through the use of survey data and principal component analysis (PCA), this large group of resilience practices was reduced to seven key resilience criteria for each stage of resilience. These resilience criteria form the basis for future resilience assessment of the project delivery process. The findings of this research add to the body of knowledge by providing a means to incorporate resilience assessment into highway project delivery, which eventually can improve the resiliency of completed infrastructure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Antoine, A. L., D. Alleman, and K. R. Molenaar. 2019. “Examination of project duration, project intensity, and timing of cost certainty in highway project delivery methods.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 04018049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000661.
Baccarini, D., and P. E. D. Love. 2014. “Statistical characteristics of cost contingency in water infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (3): 04013063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000820.
Berke, P., G. Newman, J. Lee, T. Combs, C. Kolosna, and D. Salvesen. 2015. “Evaluation of networks of plans and vulnerability to hazards and climate change: A resilience scorecard.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 81 (4): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1093954.
Bruneau, M., S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, T. D. O”Rourke, A. M. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. T. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. von Winterfeldt. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 19 (4): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497.
Bypaneni, S. P., and D. Q. Tran. 2018. “Empirical identification and evaluation of risk in highway project delivery methods.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (3): 04018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000602.
Corral, S., and M. C. Monagas. 2017. “Social involvement in environmental governance: The relevance of quality assurance processes in forest planning.” Land Use Policy 67 (Sep): 710–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.017.
Costello, A. B., and J. Osborne. 2005. “Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis.” Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 10 (1): 7.
DeAngelis, J., H. Briel, and M. Lauer. 2019. “Planning for infrastructure resilience.” Accessed September 10, 2020. https://www.planning.org/publications/report/9192800/.
Fabrigar, L. R., D. T. Wegener, R. C. MacCallum, and E. J. Strahan. 1999. “Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.” Psychol. Methods 4 (3): 272. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272.
Field, A. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.
Flannery, A., M. A. Pena, and J. Manns. 2008. Resilience in transportation planning, engineering, management, policy, and administration: A synthesis of highway practice: NCHRP synthesis 527. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Francis, R., and B. Bekera. 2014. “A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121 (Jan): 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004.
Grau, D., W. E. Back, and G. Mejia-Aguilar. 2017. “Organizational-behavior influence on cost and schedule predictability.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (5): 04017027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000542.
Guo, F., C. T. Jahren, Y. Turkan, and H. David Jeong. 2016. “Civil integrated management: an emerging paradigm for civil infrastructure project delivery and management.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (2): 04016044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000491.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2013. Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Higher Education.
Han, F., and S. M. Bogus. 2017. “Defining a resilience framework for project delivery.” In Proc., 2017 CSCE/CRC Construction Specialty Conf., Pointe Claire, QC: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Han, F., and S. M. Bogus. 2020. “Development of resilience measures for assessing the performance of water infrastructure project delivery.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (4): 04020035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000800.
Humphrey, N. 2008. “Potential impacts of climate change on US transportation.” TR News 256 (May): 21–24.
Jolliffe, I. 2011. Principal component analysis, 1094–1096. Berlin: Springer.
Kaiser, H. F. 1974. “An index of factorial simplicity.” Psychometrika 39 (1): 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
Kamalahmadi, M., and M. M. Parast. 2016. “A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 171 (Jan): 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023.
Kaplan, S., and B. J. Garrick. 1981. “On the quantitative definition of risk.” Risk Anal. 1 (1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x.
Linkov, I., et al. 2014. “Changing the resilience paradigm.” Nat. Clim. Change 4 (6): 407. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2227.
Liu, T., M. Bennon, M. J. Garvin, and S. Wang. 2017. “Sharing the big risk: Assessment framework for revenue risk sharing mechanisms in transportation public-private partnerships.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (12): 04017086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001397.
Marcelo, D., S. House, and A. Raina. 2018. Incorporating resilience in infrastructure prioritization: Application to the road transport sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Mostaan, K., and B. Ashuri. 2016. “Challenges and enablers for private sector involvement in delivery of highway public–private partnerships in the United States.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000493.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 2012. Committee on science, engineering, and public policy. Washington, DC: NAS.
National Research Council. 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13457.
Olsen, R. J. 2015. Adapting infrastructure and civil engineering practice to a changing climate. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Park, J., T. P. Seager, P. S. C. Rao, M. Convertino, and I. Linkov. 2013. “Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems.” Risk Anal. 33 (3): 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x.
Phillips, R., L. Troup, D. Fannon, and M. J. Eckelman. 2017. “Do resilient and sustainable design strategies conflict in commercial buildings? A critical analysis of existing resilient building frameworks and their sustainability implications.” Energy Build. 146 (Jul): 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.009.
Rodehorst, B., B. Dix, B. Hurley, J. Keller, R. Hyman, B. Beucler, K. Mohamed, and R. Kafalenos. 2018. “Planning to build resilience into transportation assets: Lessons learned.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (3): 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118797799.
Shane, J., K. Strong, D. Gransberg, J. Ahn, N. Allan, D. Brisk, and S. Scott III. 2014. Project management strategies for complex projects: Case study report.. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Stevens, J. P. 2002. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4th ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tran, D. Q., G. Diraviam, and R. E. Minchin Jr. 2017. “Performance of highway design-bid-build and design-build projects by work types.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001437.
Tran, D. Q., and K. R. Molenaar. 2014. “Exploring critical delivery selection risk factors for transportation design and construction projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 21 (6): 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2013-0103.
Tran, D. Q., and K. R. Molenaar. 2015. “Risk-based project delivery selection model for highway design and construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 141 (12): 04015041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001024.
USDOT and FHWA (Federal Highway Administration)2018. “2020/2024 pilot program: Resilience and durability to extreme weather.” Accessed February 28, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/pilots/extweatherpilot.cfm.
Valdes-Vasquez, R., and L. E. Klotz. 2012. “Social sustainability considerations during planning and design: Framework of processes for construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (1): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000566.
Villachica, S. W., D. L. Stone, and J. Endicott. 2004. “Project alignment ensuring successful development and implementation from day one.” Perform. Improv. 43 (10): 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140431005.
Volpe, J. A. 2011. National transportation systems center. Federal Highway Administration scenario planning guidebook. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Vugrin, E. D., D. E. Warren, M. A. Ehlen, and R. C. Camphouse. 2010. “A framework for assessing the resilience of infrastructure and economic systems.” In Sustainable and resilient critical infrastructure systems, 77–116. Berlin: Springer.
Wondimu, P. A., E. Hailemichael, A. Hosseini, J. Lohne, O. Torp, and O. Lædre. 2016. “Success factors for early contractor involvement (ECI) in Public Infrastructure Projects.” Energy Procedia 96 (Sep): 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.146.
Zhang, X. 2005. “Concessionaire’s financial capability in developing build-operate-transfer type infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (10): 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1054).
Zhang, X. 2006. “Factor analysis of public clients’ best-value objective in public–privately partnered infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (9): 956–965. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:9(956).
Zou, Y., A. Kiviniemi, and S. W. Jones. 2016. “Developing a tailored RBS linking to BIM for risk management of bridge projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 23 (6): 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2016-0009.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Nov 16, 2020
Accepted: Jul 12, 2021
Published online: Aug 19, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 19, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0882-6590. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1685-6367. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Concentrated or Dispersed: The Effects of Subcontracting Organizational Arrangements on Construction Project Resilience, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5870, 40, 3, (2024).
  • An Integrated Resilience and Assessment Methodology Framework for Addressing Uncertainty in Highway Operation and Maintenance Systems, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15123, 150, 12, (2024).
  • Identifying the Contractor’s core competencies in post-COVID-19 scenario: developing a survey instrument, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0128, (2022).
  • Developing a Framework for Dynamic Organizational Resilience Analysis in Prefabricated Construction Projects: A Project Life Cycle Perspective, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002381, 148, 10, (2022).
  • Methodological Consistency for Quantitative Analysis and Reporting in Project Delivery System Performance Research, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002338, 148, 9, (2022).
  • Shadow of Your Former Self: Exploring Project Leaders’ Post-Failure Behaviors (Resilience, Self-Esteem and Self-Efficacy) in High-Tech Startup Projects, Sustainability, 10.3390/su132212868, 13, 22, (12868), (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share