Technical Papers
Aug 31, 2018

Dimensional Estimation of Residual-Drift Demands for Bilinear Bridges under Near-Fault Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 11

Abstract

Residual drift of bridge columns is an important performance measure for structural damage and postearthquake repair decisions. Yet there are very limited models available for estimating the residual drifts accurately. This paper presents an innovative method to realistically predict the residual drifts (including their trend and upper bound) of bilinear bridge deck-column systems directly from their inelastic mechanical properties and ground motion characteristics. The proposed estimation originated from the rigorous dimensional analysis of nonlinear time-history responses of various bilinear bridge deck-column systems under near-fault ground motions. Under this framework, the peak inelastic drifts and residual drifts were presented in dimensionless forms and showed remarkable order and correlation with structure-to-pulse frequency and the dimensionless nonlinearity index that accounts for the preyielding strength, ground motion amplitude, and softening or hardening postyielding behavior. Regressive equations for maximum displacement and residual-drift demands were proposed and validated. The corresponding error of this approach was shown to be lower than those of the existing codified methods.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI-0830391, Joy Pauschke, program manager. The idea of this paper originated during a study about self-centering devices. The authors also thank other scholars for their help and intellectual exchange, in particular, Yuchuan Tang from Southeast University (China) for providing a collection of near-fault ground motions and their pulse representations.

References

Alavi, B., and H. Krawinkler. 2004. “Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33 (6): 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.369.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building. ATC-40. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Baker, J. W. 2007. “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (5): 1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
Barenblatt, G. I. 1996. Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bazzurro, P., C. A. Cornell, C. A. Menun, and M. Motahari. 2004. “Guidelines for seismic assessment of damaged buildings.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1708. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bertero, V. V., S. A. Mahin, and R. A. Herrera. 1978. “Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 6 (1): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105.
Bojórquez, E., and J. Ruiz-García. 2013. “Residual drift demands in moment-resisting steel frames subjected to narrow-band earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (11): 1583–1598. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2288.
Brown, A., and M. Saiidi. 2011. “Investigation of effect of near-fault motions on substandard bridge structures.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 10 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-011-0042-8.
Chopra, A. K., and C. Chintanapakdee. 2004. “Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures: Single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (9): 1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309).
Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goel. 2000. “Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 126 (4): 482–490. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(482).
Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goel. 2002. “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (3): 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144.
Christopoulos, C., S. Pampanin, and M. J. N. Priestley. 2003. “Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part I: Single-degree of freedom systems.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (1): 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350443.
Cuesta, I., and M. A. Aschheim. 2001. “Inelastic response spectra using conventional and pulse R-factors.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (9): 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1013).
Erduran, E., and S. K. Kunnath. 2010. “Enhanced displacement coefficient method for degrading multi-degree-of-freedom systems.” Earthquake Spectra 26 (2): 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3381157.
Erochko, J., C. Christopoulos, R. Tremblay, and H. Choi. 2011. “Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05.” J. Struct. Eng. 137 (5): 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000296.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1997a. NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Rep. No. FEMA-274. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1997b. NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Rep. No. FEMA-273. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000. Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Rep. No. FEMA-356. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2005. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Rep. No. FEMA 440. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2012. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. FEMA P-58. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gillie, J. L., A. Rodriguez-Marek, and C. McDaniel. 2010. “Strength reduction factors for near-fault forward directivity ground motions.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.014.
Hall, J. F., T. H. Heaton, M. W. Halling, and D. J. Wald. 1995. “Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 11 (4): 569–605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828.
He, W. L., and A. K. Agrawal. 2008. “Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (7): 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1177).
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 2000. Earthquake resistant design codes in Japan. Tokyo: Earthquake Engineering Committee.
Kawashima, K., G. A. MacRae, K. Hasegawa, T. Ikeuchi, and K. Oshima. 1992. “Ductility of steel bridge piers from dynamic loading tests.” In Stability and ductility of steel structures under cyclic loading, edited by Y. Fukumoto and G. Lee. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kawashima, K., G. A. MacRae, J. Hoshikuma, and K. Nagaya. 1998. “Residual displacement response spectrum.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (5): 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(523).
Kawashima, K., R. Zafra, T. Sasaki, K. Kajiwara, and M. Nakayama. 2011. “Effect of polypropylene fiber reinforced cement composite and steel fiber reinforced concrete for enhancing the seismic performance of bridge columns.” J. Earthquake Eng. 15 (8): 1194–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.569051.
Mackie, K. R., J. Wong, and B. Stojadinovic. 2011. “Bridge damage and loss scenarios calibrated by schematic design and cost estimation of repairs.” Earthquake Spectra 27 (4): 1127–1145. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3651362.
MacRae, G. A., C. Hodge, M. J. N. Priestley, and F. Seible. 1994. Route 5/405 separation. Shake table tests of as-built and retrofitted configuration. SSRP Rep. No. 94/16, p. 246. San Diego: Structural Systems Research Project, Dept. of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, Univ. of California.
MacRae, G. A., and K. Kawashima. 1997. “Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26 (7): 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199707)26:7%3C701::AID-EQE671%3E3.3.CO;2-9.
Mahin, S. A., and V. V. Bertero. 1981. “An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra.” J. Struct. Div. 107 (9): 1777–1795.
Makris, N., and C. J. Black. 2004a. “Dimensional analysis of bilinear oscillators under pulse-type excitations.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (9): 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1019).
Makris, N., and C. J. Black. 2004b. “Dimensional analysis of rigid-plastic and elasto-plastic structures under pulse-type excitations.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (9): 1006–1018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1006).
Makris, N., and C. J. Black. 2004c. “Evaluation of peak ground velocity as a ‘good’ intensity measure for near-source ground motions.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (9): 1032–1044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:9(1032).
Makris, N., and S. Chang. 2000. “Effect of viscous, visco-plastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 (1): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200001)29:1%3C85::AID-EQE902%3E3.0.CO;2-N.
Makris, N., and T. Psychogios. 2006. “Dimensional response analysis of yielding structures with first-mode dominated response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (10): 1203–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.578.
Malhotra, P. K. 1999. “Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (11): 1309–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11%3C1309::AID-EQE868%3E3.0.CO;2-U.
Mavroeidis, G. P., G. Dong, and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2004. “Near-fault ground motions, and the response of elastic and inelastic single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 33 (9): 1023–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.391.
Mavroeidis, G. P., and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2003. “A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 (3): 1099–1131. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020100.
Motaref, S., M. Saiidi, and D. Sanders. 2014. “Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (2): 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000518.
Pampanin, S., C. Christopoulos, and M. J. N. Priestley. 2003. “Performance-based seismic response of frame structures including residual deformations. Part II: Multi-degree of freedom systems.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (1): 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350444.
Riddell, R., and N. M. Newmark. 1979. Statistic analysis of the response of nonlinear systems subjected to earthquakes. Structural Rep. Series 468. Champaign, IL: Civil Engineering, Univ. of Illinois.
Ruiz-García, J., and J. D. Aguilar. 2015. “Aftershock seismic assessment taking into account postmainshock residual drifts.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (9): 1391–1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2523.
Ruiz-García, J., and C. Chora. 2015. “Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate residual drift demands in steel framed buildings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (15): 2837–2854. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2611.
Ruiz-García, J., and E. Miranda. 2005. Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements.” Technical Rep. No. 153. Stanford, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford Univ.
Ruiz-García, J., and E. Miranda. 2006a. “Direct estimation of residual displacement from displacement spectral ordinates.” In Proc., 8NCEE, Paper No. 1101. San Francisco, CA.
Ruiz-García, J., and E. Miranda. 2006b. “Evaluation of residual drift demands in regular multi-storey frames for performance-based seismic assessment.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (13): 1609–1629. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.593.
Ruiz-García, J., and E. Miranda. 2006c. “Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35 (3): 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.523.
Ruiz-García, J., and E. Miranda. 2010. “Probabilistic estimation of residual drift demands for seismic assessment of multi-story framed buildings.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.010.
Shu, Z., J. Zhang, and S. Nagarajaiah. 2017. “Dimensional analysis of inelastic structures with negative stiffness and supplemental damping devices.” J. Struct. Eng. 143 (3): 04016184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001658.
Somerville, P. G. 2003. “Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse.” Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 137 (1–4): 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3.
Tang, Y., and J. Zhang. 2011. “Response spectrum-oriented pulse identification and magnitude scaling of forward directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 29 (10): 1330–1346.
Tatano, H., and S. Tsuchiya. 2008. “A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: A spatial computable general equilibrium approach.” Nat. Hazards 44 (2): 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9151-0.
Tirasit, P., and K. Kawashima. 2007. “Seismic performance of square reinforced concrete columns under combined cyclic flexural and torsional loadings.” J. Earthquake Eng. 11 (3): 425–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601031813.
Vidic, T., P. Fajfar, and M. Fischinger. 1994. “Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23 (5): 507–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230504.
Zhang, J., and Y. Tang. 2009. “Dimensional analysis of structures with translating and rocking foundations under near-fault ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 29 (10): 1330–1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.04.002.
Zhang, J., and W. Xi. 2012. “Optimal nonlinear damping for inelastic structures using dimensional analysis.” In Proc., Structures Congress, 20th Analysis and Computation Specialty Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, J., S. Xu, and Y. Tang. 2011. “Inelastic displacement demand of bridge columns considering shear-flexure interaction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40 (7): 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1056.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 11November 2018

History

Received: May 22, 2017
Accepted: May 8, 2018
Published online: Aug 31, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 31, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Zhan Shu
Associate Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-5808. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share