Technical Papers
Mar 12, 2018

Shaking Table Testing of Segmental Hollow-Core FRP-Concrete-Steel Bridge Columns

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 5

Abstract

This article presents dynamic tests of three damage-resistant segmental hollow-core bridge columns with posttensioned unbonded strands. One column was constructed without energy dissipaters, whereas the other two columns included different external energy dissipaters. A reference RC column was also investigated. The cross section of the segmental columns was a hollow-core section composed of an outer glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) shell, an inner steel tube, and concrete shell cast in between the GFRP shell and the steel tube. The columns combine the advantages of accelerated bridge construction and self-centering as a result of rocking with high energy dissipation from the external energy dissipaters. All columns were subjected to a sequence of scaled near-fault pulse-like ground motions. The well-designed hollow-core segmental column sustained no noticeable damage and no residual drift after a sequence of motions up to 250% of the design earthquake, which caused a peak drift ratio of 8.85%. Conversely, the counterpart conventional column suffered severe damage, with rebar fracture and extensive concrete spalling. The accumulated residual drift of the conventional column was 1.5% after the sequence of motions up to 200% of the design earthquake, which caused a peak drift ratio of 4.8%. The energy dissipated by the segmental columns with external energy dissipaters was comparable to that of the conventional RC column along the tests.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge AMSYSCO Post Tensioning for the generous donation of materials used in the tests. The authors also acknowledge Fyfe Co. for the generous donation of the GFRP materials.

References

Abdelkarim, O. I., and ElGawady, M. A. (2015). “Analytical and finite-element modeling of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns.” J. Bridge Eng., B4014005.
Abdelkarim, O. I., and ElGawady, M. A. (2016a). “Behavior of hollow FRP-concrete-steel columns under static cyclic axial compressive loading.” Eng. Struct., 123, 77–88.
Abdelkarim, O. I., and ElGawady, M. A. (2016b). “Performance of hollow-core FRP–concrete–steel bridge columns subjected to vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct., 123, 517–531.
Abdelkarim, O. I., ElGawady, M. A., Anumolu, S., Gheni, A., and Sanders G. E. (2018). “Behavior of hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel columns under static cyclic flexural loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 04017188.
Abdelkarim, O. I., ElGawady, M. A., Gheni, A., Anumolu, S., and Abdulazeez, M. (2017). “Seismic performance of innovative hollow-core FRP–concrete–steel bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng., 04016120.
Anumolu, S., Abdelkarim, O., Abdulazeez, M., Gheni, A., and ElGawady M. A. (2017). “Hollow-core FRP-concrete-steel bridge columns under torsional loading.” Fibers, 5(4), 44.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard test method for apparent hoop tensile strength of plastic or reinforced plastic pipe.” D2290, West Conshohocken, PA.
Caltrans. (2013). Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.7, Sacramento, CA.
Chang, K., Loh, C., Chiu, H., Hwang, J., Cheng, C., and Wang, J. (2002). “Seismic behavior of precast segmental bridge columns and design methodology for applications in Taiwan.” Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).
Chou, C.-C., Chang, H.-J., and Hewes, J. T. (2013). “Two-plastic-hinge and two dimensional finite element models for post-tensioned precast concrete segmental bridge columns.” Eng. Struct., 46, 205–217.
Chou, C.-C., and Chen, Y. C. (2006). “Cyclic tests of post‐tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(2), 159–175.
Dawood, H., ElGawady, M., and Hewes, J. (2012). “Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads.” J. Bridge Eng., 735–746.
Dawood, H., ElGawady, M., and Hewes, J. (2014). “Factors affecting the seismic behavior of segmental precast bridge columns.” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 8(4), 388–398.
Dutta, A., and Mander, J. (1998). “Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges.” Proc., MCEER-INCEDE Center-to-Center Project of the Workshop on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in Transportation Systems, MCEER, Buffalo, NY.
ElGawady, M., Booker, A. J., and Dawood, H. M. (2010). “Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes.” J. Compos. Constr., 616–628.
ElGawady, M. A., and Dawood, H. M. (2012). “Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes.” Eng. Struct., 38, 142–152.
ElGawady, M. A., Ma, Q., Butterworth, J. W., and Ingham, J. (2011). “Effects of interface material on the performance of free rocking blocks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(4), 375–392.
ElGawady, M. A., and Sha’lan, A. (2011). “Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents.” J. Bridge Eng., 328–339.
FEMA. (2006). Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines-program plan for new and existing buildings, Washington, DC.
Gibson, N., Filiatrault, A., and Ashford, S. A. (2002). “Impulsive seismic response of bridge column-cap beam joints.” ACI Struct. J., 99(4), 470–479.
Hewes, J. T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (2002). “Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns.” SSRP-2001/25, Dept. of Structural Engineering School of Engineering Univ. of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Ichikawa, S., Matsuzaki, H., Moustafa, A., ElGawady, M. A., and Kawashima, K. (2016). “Seismic-resistant bridge columns with ultrahigh-performance concrete segments.” J. Bridge Eng., 04016049.
Japan Road Association. (2002). Design specifications of highway bridges. Part V: Seismic design, Maruzen, Tokyo.
Jeong, H., Sakai, J., and Mahin, S. A. (2008). “Shaking table tests and numerical investigation of self-centering reinforced concrete bridge columns.” PEER Rep. 2008/06, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Kim, T.-H., Lee, H.-M., Kim, Y.-J., and Shin, H. (2010). “Performance assessment of precast concrete segmental bridge columns with a shear resistant connecting structure.” Eng. Struct., 32(5), 1292–1303.
Leitner, E. J., and Hao, H. (2016). “Three-dimensional finite element modelling of rocking bridge piers under cyclic loading and exploration of options for increased energy dissipation.” Eng. Struct., 118, 74–88.
Mander, J. B., and Cheng, C.-T. (1997). “Seismic design of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design.” Technical Rep. NCEER–97–0014, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Taipei, Taiwan.
Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., and Palermo, A. (2009). “Quasi‐static and pseudo‐dynamic testing of unbonded post‐tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(3), 331–354.
Montague, P. (1978). “The experimental behaviour of double-skinned, composite, circular cylindrical shells under external pressure.” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 20(1), 21–34.
Moustafa, A. (2016). “Innovative techniques for seismic-resistant bridge columns under ground motion excitations.” Ph.D. thesis, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO.
Ou, Y.-C., Wang, P.-H., Tsai, M.-S., Chang, K.-C., and Lee, G. C. (2010a). “Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng., 255–264.
Ou, Y.-C., Tsai, M. S., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2010b). “Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1181–1198.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., and Idris, Y. (2014). “Seismic behavior of FRP-high-strength concrete–steel double-skin tubular columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014019.
Palermo, A., Pampanin, S., and Marriott, D. (2007). “Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 1648–1661.
Phan, V., Saiidi, M. S., Anderson, J., and Ghasemi, H. (2007). “Near-fault ground motion effects on reinforced concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 982–989.
Sehhati, R., Rodriguez-Marek, A., ElGawady, M., and Cofer, W. F. (2011). “Effects of near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses on multi-story structures.” Eng. Struct., 33(3), 767–779.
Shim, C. S., Chung, C.-H., and Kim, H. H. (2008). “Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of precast segmental bridge piers with a circular solid section.” Eng. Struct., 30(12), 3782–3792.
Solberg, K., Mashiko, N., Mander, J., and Dhakal, R. (2009). “Performance of a damage-protected highway bridge pier subjected to bidirectional earthquake attack.” J. Struct. Eng., 469–478.
Teng, J., Yu, T., Wong, Y., and Dong, S. (2005). “Innovative FRP-steel-concrete hybrid columns.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Advances in Steel Structures, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 545–554.
Trono, W., Jen, G., Panagiotou, M., Schoettler, M., and Ostertag, C. P. (2015). “Seismic response of a damage-resistant recentering posttensioned-HYFRC bridge column.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014096.
Wang, J. C., Ou, Y. C., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2008). “Large‐scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(12), 1449–1465.
Wong, Y., Yu, T., Teng, J., and Dong, S. (2008). “Behavior of FRP-confined concrete in annular section columns.” Compos. Part B Eng., 39(3), 451–466.
Zhang, Q., and Alam, M. S. (2016). “Evaluating the seismic behavior of segmental unbounded posttensioned concrete bridge piers using factorial analysis.” J. Bridge Eng., 04015073.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: Dec 13, 2016
Accepted: Nov 30, 2017
Published online: Mar 12, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 12, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ayman Moustafa, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65401. E-mail: [email protected]
Mohamed A. ElGawady, M.ASCE [email protected]
Benavides Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65401 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share