Technical Papers
Mar 12, 2018

Integrated Superstructure-Substructure Load Rating for Bridges with Foundation Movements

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 5

Abstract

Superstructures of highway bridges are load rated regularly as a part of the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS). It is well known that the load-carrying capacity of a superstructure is affected by foundation movements; however, the current load rating framework does not explicitly include these effects. In the current framework, foundation movement could be treated as structural condition change and considered as a permanent load. In this paper, the authors propose an integrated framework for load rating of superstructures and substructures in the presence of continuing foundation movements and geohydraulic hazards. The approach is based on the modification of the load rating equation to include foundation movements and effects of loads other than dead and live loads that can affect the load capacity of a bridge. A methodology for load rating elements loaded in biaxial moment and axial load, commonly experienced by piers, columns, and piles, has also been proposed. The term substructure functionality index (SFI) has been proposed to account for the effect of foundation movement on the functionality of critical elements such as bearings. Applications of the proposed integrated superstructure-substructure load rating and SFI have been demonstrated through two examples of actual bridges. It has been demonstrated that the load rating produced can be nonconservative if the effects of foundation movement are neglected.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by Federal Highway Administration under Contract DTFH61-14-D-00010. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration.

References

AASHTO. (2011). Manual for bridge evaluation, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2014). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). (2015). SP-17(14) reinforced concrete design handbook, volume 2, A. Taylor, T. Hamilton, III, and A. Nanni, eds., Farmington Hills, MI.
Andrawes, B., and Caiza, P. (2012). “Bridge timber piles load rating under eccentric loading conditions.” J. Bridge Eng., 700–710.
Arneson, L. A., Zevenbergen, L. W., Lagasse, P. F., and Clopper, P. E. (2012). HEC-18 evaluating scour at bridges, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Barker, R. M., Duncan, J. M., Rojiani, K. B., Ooi, P. S. K., Tan, C. K., and Kim, S. G. (1991). “Manuals for the design of bridge foundations: Shallow foundations, driven piles, retaining walls and abutments, drilled shafts, estimating tolerable movements, and load factor design specifications and commentary.” NCHRP Rep. 343, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Bozozuk, M. (1978). “Bridge foundations move.” Transportation Research Record 678, 17–21.
Cai, C., and Shahawy, M. (2003). “Understanding capacity rating of bridges from load tests.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 209–216.
Chajes, M., Mertz, D., and Commander, B. (1997). “Experimental load rating of a posted bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 1–10.
CSiBridge [Computer software]. Computers & Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.
DiMillio, A. F. (1982). Performance of highway bridge abutments supported by spread footings on compacted fill, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Dupont, B., and Allen, D. (2002). “Movements and settlements of highway bridge approaches.” Rep. No. KTC-02-18/SPR-220-00-1F, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort, KY.
FB-Pier. (2015). FB-MultiPier manual, Florida Bridge Software Institute, Gainesville, FL.
FDOT (Florida DOT). (2016). Bridge load rating manual, Tallahassee, FL.
Gao, L. (2013). Load rating highway bridges in accordance with load and resistance factor rating method, 1st Ed., Outskirts Press, Denver.
Grover, R. A. (1978). “Movements of bridge abutments and settlements of approach pavements in Ohio.” Transportation Research Board 678, 12–17.
IDOT (Illinois DOT). (2014). Bureau of local roads and streets manual, Springfield, IL.
Kim, K., and Andrawes, B. (2017). “Load rating of deteriorated and FRP retrofitted bridge abutment timber piles.” J. Bridge Eng., 04017058.
MaineDOT (Maine DOT). (2015). Load rating guide, Scarborough, ME.
MassDOT (Massachusetts DOT). (2013). LRFD bridge manual, Boston.
Mertz, D. (2005). “Load rating by load and resistance factor evaluation method.” NCHRP 20-07, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Modjeski and Masters, Inc. (2015). “Bridges for service life beyond 100 years: Service limit state design.” SHRP 2 Rep. S2-R19B-RW-1, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Moon, F., Romano, N., Masceri, D., Braley, J., Mertz, D. R., Samtani, N., Murphy, T., and Lopez de Murphy, M. (2018). “NCHRP web-only document 245: Bridge superstructure tolerance to total and differential foundation movements.” NCHRP Project 12-103, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Moulton, L. K., GangaRao, H. V. S., and Halvorsen, G. T. (1985). “Tolerable movement criteria for highway bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA/RD-85/107, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Nowak, A. S. (1999). “Calibration of LRFD bridge design code.” NCHRP Report No. 368, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Paikowsky, S. G., and Lu, Y. (2006). “Establishing serviceability limit state in the design of bridge foundations.” GeoShanghai Int. Conf.: Foundation analysis and design: Innovative methods. Geotechnical special publication, 153, ASCE, Reston, VA, 49–58.
Sanayei, M., Reiff, A., Brenner, B., and Imbaro, G. (2016). “Load rating of a fully instrumented bridge: Comparison of LRFR approaches.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015019.
Sayed, S., Sunna, H., and Moore, P. (2013). “Load rating of pile-supported bridges susceptible to scour.” J. Bridge Eng., 439–449.
Turkstra, C. J. (1970). Theory of structural design decisions, Solid Mechanics Division, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Wahls, H. (1990). Design and construction of bridge approaches, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Walkinshaw, J. L. (1978). “Survey of bridge movements in the western United States.” Transportation Research Board 678, 6–12.
Wang, Z., Chen, G., Kwon, O., Orton, S. (2011). “Calibration of load and resistance factors in LRFD foundation design specifications.” Rep. No. NUTC-R237, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 5May 2018

History

Received: May 23, 2017
Accepted: Nov 21, 2017
Published online: Mar 12, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 12, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nathan T. Davis, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155.
Ehssan Hoomaan, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The City College of CUNY, New York, NY, 10031.
Masoud Sanayei, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA 02155 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Anil K. Agrawal, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, The City College of CUNY, New York, NY, 10031.
Farrokh (Frank) Jalinoos, M.ASCE
Research Structural Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Infrastructure R&D, McLean, VA 22101.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share