Shape Optimization of UHPC Shear Keys for Precast, Prestressed, Adjacent Box-Girder Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 4
Abstract
Adjacent box-girder bridges are a popular choice for short- to intermediate-span bridges in several states because they are easy, quick to build, and cost-effective. Although longitudinal shear keys filled with grout between the girders and transverse posttensioning (TPT) ties ensure a monolithic behavior for the bridge, the durability of longitudinal shear keys still concerns researchers and engineers. Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) has been adopted as a new grout material for connections between bridge components. However, there is not yet any guidance or specification on the design of UHPC shear key configuration for adjacent box-girder bridge connections. The aim of this study was to use experimental results and finite-element (FE) modeling of direct shear, flexural, and direct tension tests to optimize a UHPC shear key configuration. These models were calibrated and validated with laboratory experimental results previously published by the authors. The models, along with different shear key configurations, were used to investigate the load transfer through previously proposed connections. After comparing the simulated shear keys in terms of the maximum load capacity, the optimized shear key shape (Type OPT) was designed to obtain a desired balance between economy and strength effects. The results demonstrated the contribution of the shear key configuration to the joint strength, and suggest that Type OPT shear key significantly increased load transfer, resulting in an enhanced serviceability. Therefore, use of Type OPT shear keys in a bridge may reduce the number of transverse shear reinforcement bars required, which in turn would improve the constructability of the bridge and reduce material and construction costs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
Abaqus [Computer software]. SIMULIA, Providence, RI.
Ahlborn, T. M., Peuse, E. J., and Misson, D. L. (2008). “Ultra-high-performance-concrete for Michigan bridges material performance–phase I.” Rep. No. MDOT RC-1525, Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton, MI.
Aktan, H., Ahlborn, T. M., Attanayake, U., and Gilbertson, C. G. (2005). “Condition assessment and methods of abatement of prestressed concrete box-beam deterioration—Phase I.” MDOT RC-1470, Michigan Dept. of Transportation, Lansing, MI.
ASTM. (2004). “Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C496/C496M-11, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading).” C78/C78M-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2014). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39/C39M-14a, West Conshohocken, PA.
Binard, J. P. (2017). “UHPC: A game-changing material for PCI bridge producers.” PCI J., 62(2), 34–46.
Biswas, M. (1986). “Precast bridge deck design systems.” PCI J., 31(2), 40–94.
Bsisu, K. A. D., Hussein, H. H., and Sargand, S. M. (2017). “The use of Hashin damage criteria, CFRP–concrete interface and concrete damage plasticity models in 3D finite element modeling of retrofitted reinforced concrete beams with CFRP sheets.” Arabian J. Sci. Eng., 42(3), 1171.
Chen, L., and Graybeal, B. A. (2010). “Finite element analysis of ultra-high performance concrete: Modeling structural performance of an AASHTO Type II beam and a 2nd generation pi-beam.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-11-020, National Technical Information Service Accession No. PB2011-100864, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Chen, L. and Graybeal, B. A. (2012a). “Modeling structural performance of second-generation ultrahigh-performance concrete pi-girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 634–643.
Chen, L., and Graybeal, B. A. (2012b). “Modeling structural performance of ultrahigh performance concrete I-girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 754–764.
Culmo, M. P. (2009). “Connection details for prefabricated bridge elements and systems.” No. FHWA-IF-09-010, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Dong, H., Yue, L., and Ahlborn, T. M. (2007). “Performance of joint connections between decked prestressed concrete bridge girders.” Proc., PCI National Bridge Conf., Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago.
El-Remaily, A., Tadros, M. K., Yamane, T., and Krause, G. (1996). “Transverse design of adjacent precast prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” PCI J., 41(4), 96–113.
Grace, N., Ushijima, K., Baah, P., and Bebawy, M. (2013). “Flexural behavior of a carbon fiber–reinforced polymer prestressed decked bulb T-beam bridge system.” J. Compos. Constr., 497–506.
Graybeal, B. (2014). “Design and construction of field-cast UHPC connections.” No. FHWA-HRT-14-084, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Graybeal, B. A. (2004). “Fabrication of an optimized UHPC bridge.” PCI National Bridge Conf., Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago.
Graybeal, B. A. (2006). “Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete.” Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-06-103, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Gulyas, R. J., and Champa, J. T. (1997). “Use of composite testing for evaluating of keyway grout for precast prestressed bridge beams.” ACI Mater. J., 94(3), 244–250.
Gulyas, R. J., Wirthlin, G. J., and Champa, J. T. (1995). “Evaluation of keyway grout test methods for precast concrete bridges.” PCI J., 40(1), 44–57.
Hussein, H. H., Sargand, S. M., Al-Jhayyish, A. K., and Khoury, I. (2017a). “Contribution of transverse tie bars to load transfer in adjacent prestressed box-girder bridges with partial depth shear key.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04016100.
Hussein, H. H., Sargand, S. M., Al Rikabi, F. T., and Steinberg, E. P. (2017b). “Laboratory evaluation of ultrahigh-performance concrete shear key for prestressed adjacent precast concrete box girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 04016113.
Hussein, H. H., Walsh, K. K., Sargand, S. M., Al Rikabi, F. T., and Steinberg, E. P. (2017c). “Modeling the shear connection in adjacent box-beam bridges with ultrahigh-performance concrete joints. I: Model calibration and validation.” J. Bridge Eng., 04017043.
Hussein, H. H., Walsh, K. K., Sargand, S. M., and Steinberg, E. P. (2016). “Interfacial properties of ultrahigh-performance concrete and high-strength concrete bridge connections.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 04015208.
Issa, M. A., Valle, C. L. R. D., Abdalla, H. A., Islam, S., and Issa, M. A. (2003). “Performance of transverse joint grout materials in full-depth precast concrete bridge deck systems.” PCI J., 48(4), 92–103.
Keierleber, B., Bierwagen, D., and Wipf, T. (2008). “Design of Buchanan County, Iowa, bridge, using ultra high-performance concrete and pi beam cross section.” Proc., PCI National Bridge Conf., Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago.
Lall, J., Alampalli, S., and DiCocco, E. F. (1998). “Performance of full-depth shear keys in adjacent prestressed box beam bridges.” PCI J., 43(2), 72–79.
Miller, R., Hlavacs, G. M., Long, T., and Greuel, A. (1999). “Full-scale testing of shear keys for adjacent box girder bridges.” PCI J., 44(6), 80–90.
Nottingham, D. (1995). “Discussion of ‘Evaluation of keyway grout test methods for precast concrete bridges’ by R. J. Gulyas, G. J. Wirthlin, and J. T. Champa.” PCI J., 40(4), 98–103.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). (2011). PCI bridge design manual, 3rd Ed., Chicago.
Porter, S. D., Julander, J., Halling, M. W., Barr, P. J., Boyle, H., and Xing, S. (2011). “Flexural testing of precast bridge deck panel connections.” J. Bridge Eng., 422–430.
Porter, S. D., Logan Julander, J., Halling, M. W., and Barr, P. J. (2012). “Shear testing of precast bridge deck panel transverse connections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 462–468.
Rahman M. A., and McQuaker, T. (2016). “Application of ultra high performance concrete in expediting the replacement and rehabilitation of highway bridges.” Proc., First Int. Interactive Symp. on UHPC, Iowa State Univ., Des Moines, Iowa.
Russell, H. G. (2009). Adjacent precast concrete box beam bridges: Connection details, Vol. 393, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Russell, H. G. (2011). “Adjacent precast concrete box-beam bridges: State of the practice.” PCI J., 56(1), 75–91.
Russell, H. G., and Graybeal, B. A. (2013). “Ultra-high performance concrete: A state-of-the-art report for the bridge community.” Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-13-060, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Sargand, S. M., Walsh, K. K., Hussein, H. H., Al Rikabi, F. T., and Steinberg, E. P. (2017). “Modeling the shear connection in adjacent box-beam bridges with ultrahigh performance concrete joints. II: Load transfer mechanism.” J. Bridge Eng., 04017044.
Yamane, T., Tadros, M. K., and Baishya, M. C. (1998). “Full depth precast, prestressed concrete bridge deck system.” PCI J., 43(3), 50–66.
Yuan, J., and Graybeal, B. (2016). “Full-scale testing of shear key details for precast concrete box-beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 04016043.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23 • Issue 4 • April 2018
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 22, 2017
Accepted: Oct 23, 2017
Published online: Jan 30, 2018
Published in print: Apr 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jun 30, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.