Professional Ethical Orientation of Civil Engineering Co‐Op Students
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 2
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the professional ethical orientation of undergraduate civil engineering students in a cooperative education program. Using a sample of 190 civil engineering undergraduate students at North‐eastern University, three research questions were investigated: (1) What ethical orientations do civil engineering students demonstrate when making professional ethical decisions?; (2) does the professional ethical orientation of the student change as he or she progresses through a civil engineering curriculum?; and (3) do students express the same professional ethical orientation for each of three core ethical concepts? Data were collected using a mailed questionnaire consisting of 12 hypothetical ethical situations that a civil engineering student might experience on co‐op. There are four questions for each of the three core ethical concept areas of the engineering code of ethics: (1) Public interest; (2) qualities of truth, honesty, and fairness; and (3) professional performance. Results indicated that the ethical orientation of students changes from a rule‐based orientation to an act‐based orientation as they progress through an undergraduate civil engineering co‐op program, and they exhibit different ethical orientations for the core ethical concepts.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baum, R. J. (1983). “A philosophical/historical perspective on contemporary concerns and trends in the area of science and values.” Engineering professionalism and ethics, J. H. Schaub and K. Pavlovic, eds., Wiley, New York, N.Y., 212–222.
2.
Bailey, K. D. (1978). Methods of social research. The Free Press, New York, N.Y.
3.
Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Addison‐Wesley, Menlo Park, N.J.
4.
Biggs, D. T. (1984). “Engineering ethics and private practice.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 65–69.
5.
Blocker, H. G. and Hannaford, W. (1974). Introduction to philosophy. D. Van Nostrand, New York, N.Y.
6.
Corwin, R. G., Taves, M. J., and Hass, J. E. (1961). “Profl. disillusionment.” Nursing Res., 10(3), 141–144.
7.
Darr, G. D. (1981). “Profl. competence and the river of knowledge.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg., ASCE, 107(13), 161–163.
8.
Dreyfus, S. E., and Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). “A five‐stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition” USAF Contract F49620‐79‐C‐0063. Dept. of Industrial Engrg. and Operations Res., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
9.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
10.
Evans, R. J. (1988). “Commentary on the code of ethics.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg., ASCE, 114(2), 148–156.
11.
Feldman, F. (1978). Introductory ethics. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
12.
Fielder, J. H. (1979). “Philosophy and engineering.” Engrg. Education, 705–708.
13.
Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics, 2nd Ed., Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
14.
Garner, R. T., and Rosen, B. (1967). Moral philosophy: A systematic introduction to normative ethics and meta‐ethics. The MacMillan Company, New York, N.Y.
15.
Gorlin, R. A. (1986). Codes of professional responsibility. Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, D.C.
16.
Gunn, A. S., and Vesilind, P. A. (1983). “Ethics and engineering education.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg., ASCE, 109(2), 143–149.
17.
Hassler, P. C. (1981). “Engineering ethics: A university course.” Issues in Engrg.: J. of Profl. Activities, Proc., ASCE, 107(3), 185–191.
18.
Isaac, S., and Michael, W. B. (1984). Handbook in research and evaluation for education and the behavioral sciences, 2nd Ed., EdITS, San Diego, Calif.
19.
James, D. N. (1981). “What is professional ethics?” Dissertation Abstracts International. 42, 3187A, University Microfilms No. 82‐07, 183, Ann Arbor, Mich.
20.
Luegenbiehl, H. C. (1983). “Professionalism through learned autonomy: Ethics codes as a tool.” 1983 ASEE Annual Conf. Proc., 2, L. P. Grayson and J. M. Biedenbach, eds., 420–424.
21.
Mantell, M. I. (1964). Ethics and professionalism in engineering. MacMillan, New York, N.Y.
22.
Martin, M. W., and Schinzinger, R. (1983). Ethics in engineering. McGraw Hill, New York, N.Y.
23.
McCuen, R. H. (1979). “The ethical dimension of professionalism.” Issues in Engrg.: J. of Profl. Activities, Proc., ASCE, 105(12), 89–105.
24.
McCuen, R. H. (1985). “One plus one makes thirty.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg., 112(1), 81–92.
25.
Mill, J. S. (1957). Utilitarianism. The Bobbs‐Merrill Company, New York, N.Y.
26.
Mouly, G. H. (1978). Educational research: The art and science of investigation. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass.
27.
Nelson, C., and Peterson, S. R. (1982a). “The engineer as moral agent.” Issues in Engrg.: J. Profl. Activities, Proc., ASCE, 108(11), 1–5.
28.
Nelson, C., and Peterson, S. R. (1982b). “If you're an engineer, you're probably a utilitarian.” Issues in Engrg.: J. Profl. Activities, Proc., ASCE, 108(11), 13–18.
29.
Oldenquist, A. G., and Slowter, E. E. (1979). “Proposed: A single code of ethics for all engineers.” Profl. Engr., 49(5), 8–11.
30.
Paustenbach, D. J. (1987). “Should engineering schools address environmental and occupational health issues?” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg., ASCE, 113(2), 93–111.
31.
Vesilind, P. A. (1988). “Rules, ethics and morals in engineering education.” Engrg. Education, 78(5), 289–293.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 2 • April 1990
Pages: 175 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1990
Published in print: Apr 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.