TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 1, 2007

Efficient Groundwater Remediation System Design Subject to Uncertainty Using Robust Optimization

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 133, Issue 3

Abstract

Many groundwater remediation designs for contaminant plume containment are developed using mathematically based groundwater flow models. These mathematical models are most effective as predictive tools when the parameters that govern groundwater flow are known with a high degree of certainty. The hydraulic conductivity of an aquifer, however, is uncertain, and so remediation designs developed using models employing one realization of the hydraulic conductivity field have an associated risk of failure of plume containment. To account for model uncertainty attributable to hydraulic conductivity in determining an optimal groundwater remediation design for plume containment, a method of optimization called robust optimization is utilized. This method of optimization is a multiscenario approach whereby multiple hydraulic conductivity fields are examined simultaneously. By examining these fields simultaneously, the variability of the uncertainty is included in the model. To increase the efficiency of the robust optimization approach, a sampling technique is developed that allows the modeler to determine the minimum number of field realizations necessary to achieve a reliable remediation design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible through funding by the U.S. Department of Energy, Contract No. DOEDE-FG07-97ER62525.

References

Ahlfeld, D. P., Mulvey, J., and Pinder, G. F. (1988). “Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory: 2: Analysis of a field site.” Water Resour. Res., 24(3), 443–452.
Bennion, D. W., and Griffiths, J. C. (1965). “A stochastic model for predicting variations in reservoir rock properties.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Fall Meeting, Denver.
Csallany, S., and Walton, W. C. (1963). “Yields of shallow dolomite wells in northern Illinois.” Rep. of Investigation 46, Illinois State Survey.
Deutsch, C. V., and Journel, A. G. (1998). GSLIB: Geostatistical software library, Oxford University Press, New York.
Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Gelhar, L. W. (1993). Stochastic subsurface hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Ghanem, R., and Spanos, P. (1991). Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach, Springer, Berlin (reissued by Dover, New York, 2003).
Gorelick, S. M. (1983). “A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods.” Water Resour. Res., 19(2), 305–319.
Gorelick, S. M. (1989). “Reliable remediation of contaminated aquifers.” United States Geological Survey yearbook, USGS, Reston, Va.
Guan, J., and Aral, M. M. (1999). “Optimal remediation with well locations and pumping rates selected as continuous decision variables.” J. Hydrol., 221(1), 20–42.
Hamed, M. M., Bedient, P. B., and Conte, J. P. (1996). “Numerical stochastic analysis of groundwater contaminant transport and plume containment.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 24(1), 1–24.
Hilton, A. B., Chanand Culver, T. B. (2005). “Groundwater remediation design under uncertainty using genetic algorithms.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 131(1), 25–34.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., and Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Continuous univariate distributions, Wiley, New York.
Karatzas, G. P., and Pinder, G. F. (1993). “Groundwater management using numerical simulation and the outer approximation method for global optimization.” Water Resour. Res., 29(10), 3371–3378.
Karatzas, G. P., and Pinder, G. F. (1997). “Groundwater contamination problems.” Water Pollution IV: Modeling, Measuring, and Prediction—Int. Conf. on Water Pollution: Modelling, Measurement, and Prediction, 231–237.
Konikow, L. F., and Mercer, J. W. (1988). “Groundwater flow and transport modeling.” J. Hydrol., 100(3), 379–409.
Law, J. (1944). “A statistical approach to the interstitial heterogeneity of sand reservoirs.” Americal Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Technical Publication No. 7(3), 202–221.
Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., and Zenios, S. A. (1995). “Robust optimization of large-scale systems.” Oper. Res., 43(2), 264–281.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: The art of scientific computing, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Ricciardi, K. L., Pinder, G. F., and Belitz, K. (2005). “Comparison of the lognormal and beta-distribution functions to describe the uncertainty in permeability.” J. Hydrol., 313(3–4), 248–256.
Sawyer, C. S., and Lin, Y. (1998). “Mixed-integer chance-constrained models for ground-water remediation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 124(5), 285–294.
Tung, Y. K. (1986). “Groundwater management by a chance-constrained model.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 112(1), 1–19.
Wagner, B. J. (1999). “Evaluating data worth for groundwater management under uncertainty.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 125(5), 281–288.
Wagner, B. J., and Gorelick, S. M. (1987). “Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(7), 1162–1174.
Wagner, J. M., Shamir, U., and Nemati, H. R. (1992). “Groundwater quality management under uncertainty: Stochastic programming approaches and the value of information.” Water Resour. Res., 28(5), 1233–1246.
Wang, T. A., and McTernan, W. F. (2002). “The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwater under uncertainty,” J. Environ. Manage., 64(3), 221–235.
Watkins, D. W., and McKinney, D. C. (1995). “Robust optimization for groundwater quality management under uncertainty.” Proc., Specialty Conf. on Water Resource Planning and Management, ASCE, New York, 879–882.
Watkins, D. W., and McKinney, D. C. (1997). “Finding robust solutions to water resources problems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 123(1), 49–58.
Yenigul, N. B., Elfeki, A. M. M., Gehrels, J. C., van den Akker, C., Hensbergen, A. T., and Dekking, F. M. (2006), “Reliability assessment of groundwater monitoring networks at landfill sites.” J. Hydrol. (in press).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 133Issue 3May 2007
Pages: 253 - 263

History

Received: Mar 25, 2005
Accepted: Apr 19, 2006
Published online: May 1, 2007
Published in print: May 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Karen L. Ricciardi [email protected]
Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. of Massachusetts in Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125. E-mail: [email protected]
George F. Pinder [email protected]
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401. E-mail: [email protected]
George P. Karatzas [email protected]
Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Technical Univ. of Crete, GR-73100 Chania, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share