Comparing High and Low Residential Density: Life-Cycle Analysis of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 132, Issue 1
Abstract
This study provides an empirical assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with high and low residential development. Three major elements of urban development are considered: construction materials for infrastructure (including residential dwellings, utilities, and roads), building operations, and transportation (private automobiles and public transit). Two case studies from the City of Toronto are analyzed. An economic input–output life-cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model is applied to estimate the energy use and GHG emissions associated with the manufacture of construction materials for infrastructure. Operational requirements for dwellings and transportation are estimated using nationally and/or regionally averaged data. The results indicate that the most targeted measures to reduce GHG emissions in an urban development context should be aimed at transportation emissions, while the most targeted measures to reduce energy usage should focus on building operations. The results also show that low-density suburban development is more energy and GHG intensive (by a factor of 2.0–2.5) than high-density urban core development on a per capita basis. When the functional unit is changed to a per unit of living space basis the factor decreases to 1.0–1.5, illustrating that the choice of functional unit is highly relevant to a full understanding of urban density effects.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anderson, W., Kanaroglou, P., and Miller, E. (1996). “Urban form, energy and the environment: A review of issues, evidence and policy.” Urban Stud., 33(1), 7–35.
Breheny, M. (1992). Sustainable development and urban form, Pion, London.
Burchell, R. W., and Listokin, D. (1982). Energy and land use, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, N.J.
Canadian Residential Energy End-use Data and Analysis Centre (CREEDAC). (2000). Household end-use energy consumption in 1997, Dalhousie University Press, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Chertow, M. R., and Esty, D. C. (1997). Thinking ecologically: The next generation of environmental policy, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.
City of Toronto. (1999). “City status bulletin–Vehicle occupancy.” ⟨www.city.toronto.on/torontoplan/citystatus_5.htm⟩ (March 15, 2004).
Cole, R. J. (1998). “Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems.” Build. Environ., 34, 335–348.
Diamond, R. (1995). “Energy savings rise high in multifamily buildings.” Home Energy Magazine Online (September/October), ⟨http://homeenergy.org/archive/hem.dis.anl.gov/eehem/95/950908.html⟩ (March 30, 2004).
Environment Australia & RMIT Centre for Design. (2004). “Greening the building life cycle: Life cycle assessment tools in building and construction.” ⟨http://buildlca.rmit.edu.au/⟩ (Feb. 21, 2004).
Environment Canada. (2003). “Canada’s greenhouse gas inventory—2001.” ⟨www.ec.gc.ca/press/2003/ghg_tables_e.htm⟩ (Feb. 27, 2004).
Fay, R., Treloar, G., and Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). “Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: A case study.” Build. Res. Inf., 28(1), 31–41.
Green Design Initiative (GDI). (2004). “Economic input-output life-cycle assessment online resource.” Carnegie Mellon Univ. ⟨www.eiolca.net⟩ (March 10–30, 2004).
Gurin, D. (2003). Understanding sprawl: A citizen’s guide, David Suzuki Foundation, Vancouver, Canada.
Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., and Lave, L. (1998). “Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 13(4), 184A–191A.
Junnila, S., and Horvath, A. (2003). “Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(4), 157–166.
Kennedy, C. A (2002). “A comparison of the sustainability of public and private transportation systems: Study of the greater Toronto area.” Transportation, 29(4), 459–493.
Lang, R. (1986). Residential density and energy conservation, Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University Press, Toronto.
MacLean, H. L., and Lave, L. B. (1998). “A life-cycle model of an automobile.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(7), 322–329.
McMullen, R. (2002). Environmental science in building, Palgrave, New York.
National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE) (2003). State of the debate. Environmental quality in Canadian cities: The federal role. Renouf, Ottawa.
Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). (2003). Energy use data handbook 1990 and 1995 to 2001, Office of Energy Efficiency, ⟨www.oee.nrcan.gc.ca⟩ (Feb. 21, 2004).
Newman, P., and Kenworthy, J. (1989). “Gasoline consumption and cities: A comparison of U.S. cities with a global survey.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 55(1), 24–37.
Newman, P., and Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence, Island, Washington, D.C.
Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H. S. (2002). “Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of U.S. residential buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(4), 132–138.
Organization for Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD). (2004). “Purchasing power parities, main economic indicators.” ⟨http://www.oecd.org/std/ppp⟩ (Feb. 22, 2004).
Peuportier, B. L. P. (2001). “Life-cycle assessment applied to the comparitive evaluation of single family houses in the French context.” Energy Build., 38, 443–450.
Squires, G. (2002). Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences and policy responses, Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C.
Statistics Canada (1999). “1996 Census, Nation Series, Cat. No. 93F0022XDB96012.” ⟨http://www.statcan.ca/English/census96/⟩ (March 1, 2004).
Statistics Canada. (2004). “Industrial product price indexes and raw materials prices indexes.” ⟨http://www.statcan.ca/english/sdds/2318.htm⟩ (March 1, 2004).
Svoboda, S. (1995). “Note on life cycle analysis.” Pollution prevention in a corporate strategy, National Pollution Prevention Centre for Higher Education, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Tarlo, K. (2002). Urban consolidation challenge—Review of environmental impacts, Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Press, Sydney, Australia.
Thormark C. (2002). “A low energy building in a life cycle—Its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential.” Build. Environ., 37, 429–435.
University of Toronto. (2003). The Transportation Tomorrow Survey: 2001, 1996 & 1986 Travel Survey Summaries for the Greater Toronto Area, Joint Program in Transportation, Toronto.
U.S. Department of Energy. (1999). “A look at residential energy consumption in 1997.” Document No. DOE/EIA-0632(97), Energy Information Administration, Washington, D.C.
Zachariah, J. L. (2003). “Towards sustainable homes through optimization: An approach to balancing life cycle environmental impacts and life cycle costs in residential buildings.” Doctoral thesis, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 132 • Issue 1 • March 2006
Pages: 10 - 21
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 24, 2004
Accepted: Jan 7, 2005
Published online: Mar 1, 2006
Published in print: Mar 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.