TECHNICAL NOTES
Nov 15, 2004

Use of Greenway Trails in Indiana

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 130, Issue 4

Abstract

The quality of existing data about the use of urban trails is poor, and planners need better data to plan new trails and manage existing ones. This note presents descriptive analyses of pedestrian and bicycle traffic counts taken with infrared counters on urban multiuse greenway trails in Indiana during the fall 2000 and spring 2001. Monthly traffic, average daily, weekday, and weekend traffic, and average hourly and peak hour traffic are presented for trails in six municipalities and for five locations on one trail in Indianapolis. Trail traffic was higher in municipalities with larger populations and higher on weekend days than on weekdays. Peak hour traffic accounted for higher proportions of traffic on weekdays than on weekend days. Traffic at different locations on one trail in Indianapolis varied considerably. Planners can use these results to estimate the demand for proposed trails, describe congestion, as inputs to benefit–cost analyses and level of service studies, and help manage use.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Botma, H. (1995). “Method to determine level of service for bicycle paths and pedestrian-bicycle paths.” Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1502, 38–44.
2.
Butler, M., Kaiser, T., and Weber, S. (2000). “Determination of error for infrared counters on recreational trails.” E400: Topics in Greenway Management (report to Indianapolis Greenways Division), School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana Univ.–Purdue Univ. Indianapolis.
3.
Eppley Institute for Parks and Public Lands, and the Center for Urban Policy and the Environment. (2001). “Summary report, Indiana trails study, a study of trails in six Indiana cities.” Indiana Univ. Eppley Institute for parks and Pubic Lands, Bloomington, Ind.
4.
Furuseth, O. J., and Altman, R. E. (1991). “Who’s on the greenway: Socioeconomic, demographic, and locational characteristics of greenway users.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 15(3), 329–336.
5.
Gobster, P. H. (1995). “Perception and use of a metropolitan greenway system for recreation.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 33, 401–413.
6.
Hunter, W., and Huang, H. (1995). “User counts on bicycle lanes and multiuse trails in the United States.” Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 1502, 45–57.
7.
Hurt, N., Sandlian, D., and Songor, S. (2001). “Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of use on the Monon Trail.” E400: Topics in Greenway Management (report to Indianapolis Greenways Division), School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana Univ.–Purdue Univ. Indianapolis.
8.
Lindsey, G. (1999). “Use of urban greenways: Insights from Indianapolis.” Landscape and Urban Planning, 45, 145–157.
9.
Moore, R.L, Graffe, A.R., Gitelson, R., and Portert, B. (1992). The impacts of rail-trails: A study of user and property owners from three trails, U.S Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service in cooperation with Pennsylvania State Univ., Washington, D.C.
10.
PFK Consulting. (1994). “Analysis of economic impacts of the Northern Central Rail Trail.” Prepared for Maryland Greenways Commission, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, M.D.
11.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. ( 2000). Bicycle and pedestrian data: Sources, needs and gaps. BTS00-02, Washington, D. C.
12.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. ( 1994). “A compendium of available bicycle and pedestrian trip generation data in the United States.” FHWA-PD-95-009, Prepared by the Univ. of North Carolina and Highway Safety Research Center, Available from the Federal Highway Administration Web site 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/order.htm〉 (June 4, 2003).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 130Issue 4December 2004
Pages: 213 - 217

History

Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

G. Lindsey
Director and Duey-Murphy Professor, Center for Urban Policy and the Environment, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana Univ.–Purdue Univ., 342 N. Senate Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46204. E-mail: [email protected]
D. B. L. Nguyen
PhD Candidate, Room 0118 Caroline Hall, Urban Planning, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share