Free access
Research Article
Oct 14, 2021

Bayesian Calibration of Multiple Coupled Simulation Models for Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Bayesian Network Approach

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 1

Abstract

Modeling and simulation for additive manufacturing (AM) are critical enablers for understanding process physics, conducting process planning and optimization, and streamlining qualification and certification. It is often the case that a suite of hierarchically linked (or coupled) simulation models is needed to achieve the above tasks, as the entirety of the complex physical phenomena relevant to the understanding of process-structure-property-performance relationships in the context of AM precludes the use of a single simulation framework. In this study using a Bayesian network approach, we address the important problem of conducting uncertainty quantification (UQ) analysis for multiple hierarchical models to establish process-microstructure relationships in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) AM. More significantly, we present the framework to calibrate and analyze simulation models that have experimentally unmeasurable variables, which are quantities of interest predicted by an upstream model and deemed necessary for the downstream model in the chain. We validate the framework using a case study on predicting the microstructure of a binary nickel-niobium alloy processed using LPBF as a function of processing parameters. Our framework is shown to be able to predict segregation of niobium with up to 94.3% prediction accuracy on test data. This article is available in the ASME Digital Collection at https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052270.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering
Volume 8Issue 1March 2022

History

Received: Feb 10, 2021
Revision received: Aug 17, 2021
Published online: Oct 14, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022

Authors

Affiliations

Wm Michael Barnes‘64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 e-mail: [email protected]
Mohamad Mahmoudi
Wm Michael Barnes‘64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Kubra Karayagiz
Department of Material Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Luke Johnson
Department of Material Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Raiyan Seede
Department of Material Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Ibrahim Karaman
Department of Material Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Raymundo Arroyave
Department of Material Science & Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Alaa Elwany [email protected]
Wm Michael Barnes‘64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 email: [email protected]

Funding Information

Army Research Office10.13039/100000183: W911NF-18-1-0278
National Science Foundation10.13039/100000001: CMMI-1846676

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share