Scholarly Papers
Sep 14, 2023

A Legitimate Alternative for Unbalanced Bidding in Unit Price Contracts

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 4

Abstract

Unit-price contracts are common in public construction projects. Such contracts expose contractors to economic risks due to deviations between owner-estimated quantities and actual quantities of work. Contractors typically respond to such risks by submitting unbalanced bids that are opposed by owners and may lead to the rejection of the submitted bid. This paper presents the development of a legitimate alternative for unbalanced bids and proposes a bid adjustment procedure that can be used by bidders to adjust item rates before submitting the bid based on the envisioned quantities of work. The procedure can be used whether the bidding documents include a changed quantity clause or not and takes into consideration the terms of the changed quantity clause if such a clause exists in the bidding documents. The procedure protects the contractor from financial losses when the project experiences an underrun in quantities. Likewise, the procedure improves the competitiveness of the contractor when the project is expected to experience an overrun in quantities. The procedure is expected to help contractors submit a responsive and balanced bid and eliminate the need to submit an unbalanced bid. An illustrative example is analyzed to show the use of the procedure and its effectiveness in improving the profitability of the contract.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Works Cited

Afshar, A., and H. Amiri. 2010. “A min-max regret approach to unbalanced bidding in construction.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 14 (5): 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-0972-0.
Alhyari, O., and K. Hyari. 2021. “Impact of variation in estimated quantity clauses on allocating financial risks in measurement contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (4): 04521032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000499.
Arditi, D., and R. Chotibhongs. 2009. “Detection and prevention of unbalanced bids.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 27 (8): 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903117785.
Bajari, P., S. Houghton, and S. Tadelis. 2014. “Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of adaptation costs.” Am. Econ. Rev. 104 (4): 1288–1319. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1288.
Burnett, J., and B. Wampler. 1998. “Unit price contracts: A practical framework for determining competitive bid prices.” J. Appl. Bus. Res. 14 (3): 63–72. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v14i3.5704.
Cattell, D., P. Bowen, and A. Kaka. 2010. “The risks of unbalanced bidding.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 28 (4): 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003663264.
CDOT (Colorado DOT). 2019. “Standard specifications for road and bridge construction.” Accessed October 14, 2022. https://www.codot.gov/business/designsupport/cdot-construction-specifications/2019-construction-specifications/2019-specs-book/2019-standard-specifications.
El-Sayegh, S., T. AbdRaboh, D. Elian, N. ElJarad, and Y. Ahmad. 2022. “Developing a bi-parameter bidding model integrating price and sustainable construction practices.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 22 (11): 2191–2198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1768625.
Enshassi, A., S. Mohamed, and Z. Modough. 2013. “Contractors’ selection criteria: Opinions of Palestinian construction professionals.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 13 (1): 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2013.10773203.
Ewerhart, C., and K. Fieseler. 2003. “Procurement auctions and unit-price contracts.” RAND J. Econ. 34 (3): 569–581. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593747.
Gransberg, D., and C. Riemer. 2009. “Impact of inaccurate engineer’s estimated quantities on unit price contracts.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 135 (11): 1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000084.
Hoogenboom, J., W. Dale, and C. Martell. 2006. “Risk analysis and optimization of the (un)balanced bid.” In AACE international transactions, R171. Fairmont, WV: Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering.
Hyari, K. 2015. “Handling unbalanced bidding in construction projects: Prevention rather than detection.” J. Construct. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001045.
Hyari, K. 2016. “Owner’s countermeasures to skewed bidding in construction projects: Review of current practices and proposal for new countermeasures.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (3): 04016053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000502.
Hyari, K., and T. Alamayreh. 2022. “Unbalanced bidding in construction projects: A contractors’ perspective.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 23 (12): 2058–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2035498.
Hyari, K., N. Shatarat, and A. Khalafallah. 2017. “Handling risks of quantity variations in unit-price contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (10): 04017079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001393.
Jiang, Y., Y. Bai, S. Han, and T. Lin. 2019. “Probability of failure in infrastructure project unbalanced bidding.” In Proc., 55th Annual Int. Conf. Denver: Associated Schools of Construction.
Li, G., C. Chen, I. Martek, and Y. Ao. 2020. “Bid or no-bid decision model for international construction projects: Evidential reasoning approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (2): 04020161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001984.
Liu, X., L. Lin, and D. Zang. 2009. “Stochastic programming models and hybrid intelligent algorithm for unbalanced bidding problem.” Comput. Inf. Sci. 2 (1): 188–194. https://doi.org/10.5539/cis.v2n1p188.
Long, R. J. 2013 “Construction claims for variation in quantity.” Technical Report, Long International. Accessed October 25, 2022. https://www.experts.com/content/articles/Long-International-Construction-Claims-Variation-Quantity.pdf.
Mandell, S., and J. Nystrom. 2011 “Endogenous risk in unbalanced bidding.” In Proc., Management and Innovation for a Sustainable Built Environment. Rotterdam, Netherlands: International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation.
MD DOT (Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration). 2018. “Standard specifications for construction and materials.” Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration. Accessed November 1, 2022. https://www.roads.maryland.gov/ohd2/2018_Standard_Specifications.pdf.
MnDOT (Minnesota DOT). 2018. “Standard specifications for construction.” Accessed November 1, 2022. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/pre-letting/spec/2018/2018-spec-book-final.pdf.
NCDOT (North Carolina DOT). 2018. Standard specifications for roads and structures. Raleigh, NC: NCDOT.
NJDOT (New Jersey DOT). 2019. “Standard specifications for road and bridge construction.” Accessed October 13, 2022. https://www.state.nj.us/transportation/eng/specs/2019/pdf/StandSpecRoadBridge2019_20201009.pdf.
Nystrom, J. 2015. “The balance of unbalanced bidding.” Procedia Econ. Finance 21 (Jan): 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00155-0.
Oke, A., A. Omoraka, and A. Olatunbode. 2020. “Appraisal of factors affecting bidding decisions in Nigeria.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 20 (2): 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484846.
Perera, B., M. Wijewickrama, W. Ranaweera, and I. Gamage. 2021. “Significant factors influencing the bid mark-up decision of infrastructure projects in Sri Lanka.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 21 (8): 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1583849.
Renes, S. 2011. Balancing the bids, solutions for unit-price auctions. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute.
SCDOT (South Carolina DOT). 2007. “Standard specifications for highway construction.” Accessed October 13, 2022. http://www.scdot.org/doing/doingpdfs/2007_full_specbook.pdf.
Skitmore, M., and D. Cattell. 2013. “On being balanced in an unbalanced world.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64 (1): 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.29.
Stark, R. 1974. “Unbalanced highway contract tendering.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 25 (3): 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1974.72.
Tan, W., and H. Suranga. 2008. “The winner’s curse in the Sri Lankan construction industry.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 8 (1): 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2008.10773106.
Yizhe, T., and L. Youjie. 1992. “Unbalanced bidding on contracts with variation trends in client-provided quantities.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 10 (1): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199200000006.
Zang, D., L. Lin, and X. Liu. 2009. “Unbalanced bidding problem with fuzzy random variables.” Int. Bus. Res. 2 (1): 175–182. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v2n1p175.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 4November 2023

History

Received: Jan 22, 2023
Accepted: Jul 6, 2023
Published online: Sep 14, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 14, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite Univ., Zarqa 13133, Jordan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-5490. Email: [email protected]
Beavers Charitable Trust and Allan Myers Professor of Civil Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802-1408. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-7398. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share