Game Theory Approach to Decision-Making Analysis of Dispute Resolution
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 4
Abstract
The issues of disputes in construction projects are unavoidable and result in many conflicts that impact the project’s performance, contribute to project cost overruns, and may lead to several delays in the project’s schedule. The outcome of a dispute is dependent on the stakeholders’ actions and preferences. To this end, this paper aims to model the interdependent decision-making of the owner and contractor during project disputes in the construction industry via game theory, based on the decision-makers’ criteria in evaluating the outcome of the dispute. As such, this paper sheds light on possible agreements before arbitration, avoiding judiciary disturbance and aiming to save time and cost and reduce the burden on the national courts. This may strengthen the principle of participation against competition through project execution and finding the optimal settlement values within the dispute procedures. The paper utilizes the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to account for the heterogeneous criteria of the different players, which ultimately impact their decision-making and the equilibrium of the game. The model is able to define the equilibrium point that satisfies both players in a dispute using game theory. Ultimately, this model will impact the construction industry by providing a framework for estimating the claim’s possible outcome. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by providing practitioners with a transformable model that can be used for different heterogenic stakeholders, to predict the expected outcome of a dispute.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data of the questionnaire and model calculations that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Works Cited
AbouRizk, S. M., and S. P. Dozzi. 1993. “Application of computer simulation in resolving construction disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 119 (Feb): 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:2(355).
Acharya, N. K., Y. Dai Lee, and H. Man Im. 2006. “Conflicting factors in construction projects: Korean perspective.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 13 (6): 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980610712364.
Alozn, A. E., and A. Galadari. 2017. “The arbitrating party utility function: An expected utility approach.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (Jan): 04517013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000230.
Antoniou, F., and G. Aretoulis. 2019. “A multi-criteria decision-making support system for choice of method of compensation for highway construction contractors in Greece.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 19 (Aug): 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452103.
Bakhary, N. A., H. Adnan, and A. Ibrahim. 2015. “A study of construction claim management problems in Malaysia.” Procedia Econ. Finance 23 (Mar): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00327-5.
Bayraktar, M. E., F. Arif, M. Hastak, and N. A. Gad. 2011. “Judiciary’s use of the critical path method to resolve construction claims.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 4 (Feb): 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000079.
Chan, E. H., H. C. Suen, and C. K. Chan. 2006. “MAUT-based dispute resolution selection model prototype for international construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (5): 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:5(444).
Cheung, S. O., P. T. Chow, and T. W. Yiu. 2009. “Contingent use of negotiators’ tactics in construction dispute negotiation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (Nov): 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:6(466).
Cheung, S. O., K. Li, and Y. H. Ng. 2019. “Study of endowment effect in construction project dispute resolution.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (Aug): 04519041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000346.
Cheung, S.-O., and H. C. H. Suen. 2002. “A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 20 (7): 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190210157568.
Chou, J.-S. 2012. “Comparison of multilabel classification models to forecast project dispute resolutions.” Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (11): 10202–10211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.103.
Davies, E., P. Fenn, and M. O’Shea. 1998. Dispute resolution and conflict management in construction: An international perspective. London: Taylor & Francis.
Eissa, R., M. S. Eid, and E. Elbeltagi. 2021a. “Conceptual profit allocation framework for construction joint ventures: Shapley value approach.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (Feb): 04021016 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000911.
Eissa, R., M. S. Eid, and E. Elbeltagi. 2021b. “Current applications of game theory in construction engineering and management research: A social network analysis approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (Aug): 04021066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002085.
El-adaway, I. H., and A. A. Kandil. 2009. “Multiagent system for construction dispute resolution (MAS-COR).” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (Feb): 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000144.
El-Razek, M. E. A., H. Bassioni, and W. A. El-Salam. 2007. “Investigation into the causes of claims in egyptian building construction.” In Proc., 23rd Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) Conf. Belfast, UK: Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Elziny, A. A., M. A. Mohamadien, H. M. Ibrahim, and M. K. Abdel Fattah. 2016. “An expert system to manage dispute resolutions in construction projects in Egypt.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 7 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.05.002.
Faghih, A., and R. Akhavian. 2019. “A game-theory approach to construction dispute resolution through mediation.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (Feb): 05019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000325.
Francis, J. J., M. Johnston, C. Robertson, L. Glidewell, V. Entwistle, M. P. Eccles, and J. M. Grimshaw. 2010. “What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.” Psychol. Health 25 (10): 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015.
Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. “How many interviews are enough? Field methods.” Field Method 18 (1): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.
Hagaman, A. K., and A. Wutich. 2017. “How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on guest, bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) landmark study.” Field Methods 29 (1): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16640447.
Haugen, T., and A. Singh. 2014. “Dispute resolution strategy selection.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 7 (May): 05014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000160.
Ho, S. P., and L. Y. Liu. 2004. “Analytical model for analyzing construction claims and opportunistic bidding.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (Jun): 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(94).
Kaplan, N. L. F. 1991. Hong Kong arbitration—Cases and materials. Singapore: Butterworths Tolley.
Kassab, M., T. Hegazy, and K. Hipel. 2010. “Computerized DSS for construction conflict resolution under uncertainty.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (Feb): 1249–1257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000239.
Kassab, M., K. Hipel, and T. Hegazy. 2006. “Conflict resolution in construction disputes using the graph model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (Mar): 1043–1052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:10(1043).
Khanzadi, M., S. Dabirian, and V. Yousefi. 2009. “Application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to prioritize causes of claims based on the effect on the time and costs of infrastructural projects in the field of Iran oil and gas.” In Proc., Int. Symp. on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP), 14. Pittsburgh, PA : Univ. of Pittsburgh. https://doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2009.094.
Khanzadi, M., E. Eshtehardian, and A. Chalekaee. 2016. “A game theory approach for optimum strategy of the owner and contractor in delayed projects.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 22 (Feb): 1066–1077. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1210222.
Khanzadi, M., Z. Turskis, G. G. Amiri, and A. Chalekaee. 2017. “A model of discrete zero-sum two-person matrix games with grey numbers to solve dispute resolution problems in construction.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (6): 824–846. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1323005.
Kisi, K. P., N. Lee, R. Kayastha, and J. Kovel. 2020. “Alternative dispute resolution practices in international road construction contracts.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (Mar): 04520001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000373.
Lessani, A. 2016. Decision analysis in construction claims. College Park, MD: Digital Repository at the Univ. of Maryland. https://doi.org/10.13016/M2126X.
Marzouk, M., L. El-Mesteckawi, and M. El-Said. 2011. “Dispute resolution aided tool for construction projects in Egypt/Ginčų sprendimo pagalbos priemonė statybos projektams egipte.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (Jan): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2011.554165.
Mashwama, X. N., C. Aigbavboa, and D. Thwala. 2016. “Investigation of construction stakeholders’ perception on the effects & cost of construction dispute in Swaziland.” Procedia Eng. 164 (May): 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.610.
Mitropoulos, P., and G. Howell. 2001. “Model for understanding, preventing, and resolving project disputes.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (Aug): 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:3(223).
Mohammadi, S., and M. T. Birgonul. 2016. “Preventing claims in green construction projects through investigating the components of contractual and legal risks.” J. Cleaner Prod. 139 (Mar): 1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.153.
Musonda, H. M., and M. Muya. 2010. “Construction dispute management and resolution in Zambia.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 3 (Nov): 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000059.
Rastegar, H., B. Arbab Shirani, S. H. Mirmohammadi, and E. Akhondi Bajegani. 2019. “A game theory approach for determining optimum strategy of claim resolution in construction projects.” J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 12 (3): 1–21.
Saaty, R. W. 1987. “The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used.” Math. Model. 9 (3–5): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Stamatiou, D. R. I., K. A. Kirytopoulos, S. T. Ponis, S. Gayialis, and I. Tatsiopoulos. 2019. “A process reference model for claims management in construction supply chains: The contractors’ perspective.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 19 (Mar): 382–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1452100.
York, S. D. 1996. Practical ADR. London: FT Law & Tax.
Zaneldin, E. K. 2006. “Construction claims in United Arab Emirates: Types, causes, and frequency.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (5): 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.02.006.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 4 • November 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 6, 2022
Accepted: May 16, 2023
Published online: Jul 11, 2023
Published in print: Nov 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.