Assessing the Functionality of Transboundary Water Compacts, Decrees, and Agreements in the United States
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2
Abstract
As development proceeds, transboundary water conflicts will intensify due to new dams, diversions, and urbanization, as well as climate change and lack of cooperation. Water treaties, compacts, decrees, and agreements will be integral to solutions at all scales. Making them work is challenging, but essential. The paper examines a set of compacts, US Supreme Court rulings, and other agreements to identify lessons and insights for water governance in transboundary situations. Water compacts in the West are usually to allocate water resources equitably between states, and in the East, they focus on water quality or flood control goals. A recent Supreme Court ruling extends their possible application to groundwater. The situations examined ranged across different regions, types of problems, and institutional arrangements to include state-to-state, terminal lake, multistate rivers, and unique cases. While the compacts do not work perfectly and their allocation formulas may be rigid, they have been somewhat effective as focal points for negotiation. However, their future is uncertain, and the effort expended in cooperation will be symptomatic of the effectiveness of shared water governance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
List of Cases
Alliance for the Great Lakes v. Department of Natural Resources, https://law.justia.com/cases/illinois/court-of-appeals-first-appellate-district/2020/1-18-2587.html.
Arizona v. California, No. 8 Original, 373 US 546 (1963), https://www.justice.gov/enrd/arizona-v-california.
Florida v. Georgia, No. 142 Original, 92 US, (2021), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20O0142.
Kansas v. Colorado, No. 105, Original, 514 US 673 (1995), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/105ORIG.ZO.html.
Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado, No. 126 Original, 574 US 445 (2015), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/126orig.
Mississippi v. Tennessee et al., No. 143 Original, 595 US (2021), https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/143-orig.
Montana v. Wyoming and North Dakota, No. 137 Original, 63 US (2011), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/137orig.
Nebraska v. Wyoming, (108ORIG), 515 US 1 (1995), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/108ORIG.ZO.html.
New Jersey v. New York, No. 16, Original, 283 US 336 (1931), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/283/336/.
States of Oklahoma and Texas v. State of New Mexico, No. 109 Original, 501 US 221 (1991), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/501/221
Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann, 569 US 614 (2013), https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-889.
Texas v. New Mexico et al., No. 141 Original, 583 US (2018), https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/141orig_f204.pdf.
Texas v. New Mexico, No. 65, Original, 482 US 124 (1987), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/482/124/.
Winters v. United States, No. 158, 207 US 564 (1908), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/207/564/.
Wisconsin v. Illinois, No. 1 Original, 388 US 426 (1967), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/388/426/.
Works Cited
Barker, M. K., N. J. Reid, and A. A. Moir. 2020. “Supreme Court’s 2020-2021 preview: Interstate water rights.” National Law Review. Accessed July 17, 2022. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/supreme-court-s-2020-2021-preview-interstate-water-rights.
Bear River Commission. 2020. “The 2017 20-year compact review.” Accessed July 8, 2022. https://bearrivercommission.org/docs/20-Year%20Compact%20Review%20-%202017.pdf.
Blackwell, H. 2022. “Water law update: The equitable apportionment doctrine: It’s not just for rivers and streams anymore.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/water-law-update-the-equitable-7251464/.
Bondie, M. 2013. “Supreme Court rules on water resource fights.” Accessed July 23, 2002. https://www.metroplanning.org/chicagolandh2o/blog/2013/08/20/supreme-court-rules-on-water-resource-fights/index.html.
Carlile, M. 2021. “The Supreme Court’s decision on the Mississippi-Tennessee aquifer conflict will change US water wars.” Time. Accessed July 23, 2022. https://time.com/6122947/supreme-court-water-mississippi-tennessee/.
Colorado Division of Water Resources. 2006. “A summary of compacts and litigation governing Colorado’s use of interstate streams.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://dnrweblink.state.co.us/dwr/0/edoc/3109667/DWR_3109667.pdf?searchid=3ec5366c-3574-4130-8e9f-64a6238e8bc2.
Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute. 2022. “Compacts clause.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-1/section-10/clause-3/compacts-clause.
CSG (Council of State Governments). 2022. “National center for interstate compacts.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://apps.csg.org/ncic/.
DeMasters, M. M. 2014. “Environmental reviews and case studies: Ensuring compliance with interstate water compacts at the state and local levels: A case study of the Arkansas River compact.” Environ. Pract. 16 (2): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046614000064.
De Stefano, L., J. Petersen-Perlman, E. Sproles, J. Eynard, and A. T. Wolf. 2017. “Assessment of transboundary river basins for potential hydro-political tensions.” Global Environ. Change 45 (Jul): 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.04.008.
Dinar, A., K. Kemper, W. Blomquist, M. Diez, G. Sine, and W. Fru. 2005. “Decentralization of river basin management: A global analysis.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3637.” Accessed July 15, 2022. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/8219/wps3637.txt?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
DuMars, C. T., and D. Seeley. 2004. The failure of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River basin and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa River basin compacts and a guide to the successful establishment of interstate water compacts. Getzville, NY: Heinonline.
Ganoulis, J., and J. Fried. 2018. “Transboundary water conflicts and cooperation.” In Transboundary hydro-governance. Berlin: Springer.
Gelt, J. 1997. “Sharing Colorado River water: History, public policy and the Colorado River compact.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://wrrc.arizona.edu/publications/arroyo-newsletter/sharing-colorado-river-water-history-public-policy-and-colorado-river.
George Washington University Jacob Burns Law Library. 2022. “About interstate compacts.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://law.gwu.libguides.com/c.php?g=187759&p=8338623.
Giordano, M., A. Drieschova, J. A. Duncan, Y. Sayama, D. Stefano, and A. T. Wolf. 2013. “A review of the evolution and state of transboundary freshwater treaties.” Int. Environ. Agreements: Politics Law Econ. 13 (2): 13.
Great Lakes Commission. 2022. “Assessing the investment: Case studies.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.glc.org/work/blue-economy/GLRI-economic-impact/case-studies.
Grigg, N. S. 2016. Integrated water resources management: An interdisciplinary approach. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Grigg, N. S. 2019. “Royce Tipton and the inflow–outflow method of compact accounting.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 145 (4): 80523. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001383.
Halloran, K. 2009. “Is the International Court of Justice the right forum for transboundary water pollution disputes?” Accessed July 9, 2022. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=sdlp.
ICWP (Interstate Council on Water Policy). 2020. “Interstate water resource management agreements and organizations.” Accessed July 6, 2022. https://icwp.org/committee-activities/interstate-water-organizations-a-primer-december-2020/.
International Boundary and Water Commission. 2022. “About us.” Accessed July 7, 2022. https://www.ibwc.gov/home.html.
International Court of Justice. 2022. “How the court works.” Accessed July 9, 2022. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/how-the-court-works.
International Water Law Project. 2022. “Interstate water agreements of the United States.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.internationalwaterlaw.org/documents/interstate_us.html.
Kenney, D. S. 2002. Water allocation compacts in the West: An overview. Boulder, CO: Univ. of Colorado.
Leitman, S. 2008. “Lessons learned from transboundary management efforts in the Apalachicola–Chattahoochee–Flint Basin, USA.” In Transboundary water resources: A foundation for regional stability in central Asia. Berlin: Springer.
Little, J. B. 2009. “The Ogallala aquifer: Saving a vital US water source.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-ogallala-aquifer/.
Lowry, C. 2021. “SCOTUS ruling makes clear that Alabama must develop a water plan.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://alabamarivers.org/scotus-ruling-makes-clear-that-alabama-must-develop-a-water-plan/.
Muys, J. C., G. W. Sherk, and M. C. O’Leary. 2007. “Utton transboundary resources center model interstate water compact.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol47/iss1/3.
Nelson, B. 2020. “Muddy water blues: How the murky doctrine of equitable apportionment should be refined.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-105-issue-4/muddy-water-blues-how-the-murky-doctrine-of-equitable-apportionment-should-be-refined/.
Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission. 2022. “ORSANCO compact.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.orsanco.org/orsanco-compact/.
Olcott, W. D. 1987. “Equitable apportionment: A judicial bridge over troubled waters.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1855&context=nlr.
Oregon State University. 2022. “Transboundary freshwater dispute database.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://transboundarywaters.science.oregonstate.edu/content/transboundary-freshwater-dispute-database.
Pace University Elisabeth Haub School of Law. 2022. “Student project: Interstate water compacts: Introduction.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://libraryguides.law.pace.edu/interstatewatercompacts.
Penrod, E. 2018. “The tri-state compact that could destroy the Great Salt Lake.” Accessed July 16, 2022. https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/water/articles/2018/07/05/the-tri-state-compact-that-could-destroy-the-great-salt-lake.
Petsch, H. E. 1985. Inventory of interbasin transfers of water in the western conterminous United States. USGS Open-File Rep. 85-166. Accessed July 15, 2022. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1985/0166/report.pdf.
Plattoff, E. 2018. “Federal government may fight alongside Texas in water dispute, US Supreme Court rules.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.texastribune.org/2018/03/05/federal-government-may-fight-texas-water-dispute-us-supreme-court-rule/.
Prokop, D. 2022. “Settlement talks in Supreme Court Rio Grande water case push back trial.” Accessed July 6, 2022. https://elpasomatters.org/2022/02/01/settlement-talks-in-scotus-rio-grande-water-case-push-back-trial/.
Rayes, A. 2022. “‘Where’s the river?’ Republican River basin’s disappearing water threatens Eastern Plains agriculture, ecology.” Accessed July 20, 2022. https://www.kunc.org/environment/2022-01-06/wheres-the-river-republican-river-basins-disappearing-water-threatens-eastern-plains-agriculture-ecology.
Reynolds, S. E., and P. B. Mutz. 1974. “Water deliveries under the Rio Grande Compact.” Accessed July 7, 2022. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol14/iss2/3.
Robertson, J. H. 1992. “Oklahoma and Texas v. New Mexico: A hastily negotiated river compact leads to problems in equitable apportionment of the Canadian river.” Nat. Resour. J. 32 (3): 705–722.
Sarine, L. E. 2012. “The Supreme Court’s problematic deference to special masters in interstate water disputes.” Ecol. Law Q. 39 (2): 535–570.
Schulte, G. 2022. “Nebraska announces $500M plan to claim water from Colorado.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.denverpost.com/2022/01/10/nebraska-plan-claim-water-from-colorado/.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. 2022. “Red River Compact Commission.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://www.tceq.texas.gov/permitting/compacts/redriver.html.
Truckee Meadows Water Authority. 2022. “Truckee River operating agreement.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://tmwa.com/your-water/topics-facts/truckee-river-operating-agreement/.
UN Environment Programme. 2016. “Transboundary waters systems–Status and trends. Vol. 6. Crosscutting analysis.” Accessed July 5, 2022. https://wesr.unep.org/media/docs/assessments/transboundary_waters_systems_status_and_trends_crosscutting_analysis.pdf.
UN (United Nations). 2022. “The water convention.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/water_cooperation_2013/water_convention.shtml.
UN-Water. 2021. “Progress on transboundary water cooperation.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.unwater.org/publications/progress-on-transboundary-water-cooperation-652-2021-update/.
UN-Water. 2022. “Transboundary waters.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/transboundary-waters/.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2012. “Colorado River basin water supply and demand study.” Accessed July 6, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/bsp/docs/finalreport/ColoradoRiver/CRBS_Executive_Summary_FINAL.pdf.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022a. “Colorado River Compact.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/pao/pdfiles/crcompct.pdf.
US Bureau of Reclamation. 2022b. “Fort Sumner project.” Accessed July 23, 2022. https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=451.
USGS. 2022. “The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint (ACF) River National Water Quality Assessment (NAWQA) program study.” Accessed July 4, 2022. https://www2.usgs.gov/water/southatlantic/ga/nawqa/basin/location.html.
US Supreme Court. 2022. “Agreement on H-I model changes to address increases in irrigation efficiency for pumped groundwater.” Accessed July 16, 2022. https://www.supremecourt.gov/SpecMastRpt/2011%20Agreement%20as%20Amended%20August%202015.pdf.
Wyoming Water Development Office. 2022. “Snake River compact, 1949.” Accessed July 25, 2022. https://waterplan.state.wy.us/BAG/snake/briefbook/ss_compact.html.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 2 • May 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 26, 2022
Accepted: Dec 29, 2022
Published online: Feb 22, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 22, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.