Scholarly Papers
Jan 23, 2023

Optimism Bias in Bidding: Contractors’ Horizontally Biased Estimating Behavior

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 2

Abstract

In the construction management literature, it is not an ultimately settled matter that optimism bias is one of the undisputed factors or reasons affecting cost underestimation and cost overrun. This study tried to answer whether bidders—usually legal entities, not natural persons—would exhibit optimism bias-like behavior when bidding for construction projects and whether financial ramifications would follow. Two hundred eighty-six projects delivered to the Ohio Department of Transportation between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed to test the proposed hypothesis. It was observed that bidders were more optimistically biased when bidding for long-duration projects than short-duration projects. The observation strengthens the causal nature between optimism bias and cost underestimation and encourages stakeholders to develop internal or external monitoring systems that call out optimism bias at the organizational level.

Practical Applications

Project-based organizations, such as engineering and construction firms, generally have the function of estimating. Prior research has shown that individual estimators are subject to various cognitive biases, including optimism bias; in other words, estimators may feel overly confident about the chance of favorable outcomes. However, such estimators hardly work individually; instead, estimators work as teams, especially for large and complex projects, to estimate the cost of projects as accurately as possible. The observation reported in this paper strengthens the argument that such teams are subject to optimism bias-like group behavior, and such behavior is time dependent. Therefore, project-based organizations are advised to investigate their historic cost data to see whether their records show horizontally biased estimating behavior. In addition, project-based firms are advised to establish internal steps to remind their estimation teams of their tendency to overestimate the chance of favorable outcomes, especially when estimating long project horizons.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Y. K. expresses his appreciation for Professors Michelle Bensi, Qingbin Cui, Gerald Galloway, and Gideon Mark at the University of Maryland. Their original comments have served as the inspiration for this research project.

References

Works Cited

Annamalaisami, C. D., and A. Kuppuswamy. 2019. “Reckoning construction cost overruns in building projects through methodological consequences.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 22 (6): 1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1683689.
Bayram, S., and S. Al-Jibouri. 2018. “Cost forecasting using RCF: A case study for planning public building projects costs in Turkey.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 18 (5): 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2017.1333399.
Bottemanne, H., O. Morlaàs, P. Fossati, and L. Schmidt. 2020. “Does the coronavirus epidemic take advantage of human optimism bias?” Front. Psychol. 11 (Aug): 2001. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02001.
Cassella, S., B. Golez, H. Gulen, and P. Kelly. 2021. “Horizon bias in expectations formation.” Preprint, submitted August 8, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3759035.
Catalão, F. P., C. O. Cruz, and J. M. Sarmento. 2019. “The determinants of cost deviations and overruns in transport projects, an endogenous models approach.” Transp. Policy 74 (Feb): 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.008.
Chadee, A., S. R. Hernandez, and H. Martin. 2021. “The influence of optimism bias on time and cost on construction projects.” Emerging Sci. J. 5 (4): 429–442. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2021-01287.
Cutello, C. A., C. Walsh, Y. Hanoch, and E. Hellier. 2021. “Reducing optimism bias in the driver’s seat: Comparing two interventions.” Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 78 (Apr): 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.013.
Dricu, M., L. Kress, and T. Aue. 2020a. “The neurophysiological basis of optimism bias.” In Cognitive biases in health and psychiatric disorders, 41–70. Amsterdan, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816660-4.00003-9.
Dricu, M., L. Schüpbach, M. Bristle, R. Wiest, D. A. Moser, and T. Aue. 2020b. “Group membership dictates the neural correlates of social optimism biases.” Sci. Rep. 10 (1): 1139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58121-4.
Engemann, K. M. 2019. “The Fed’s inflation target: Why 2 percent?” Accessed December 30, 2021. https://www.stlouisfed.org/open-vault/2019/january/fed-inflation-target-2-percent.
Enshassi, A., and A. Ayyash. 2014. “Factors affecting cost contingency in the construction industry—Contractors’ perspective.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 14 (3): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2014.922729.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “From nobel prize to project management: Getting risks right.” Project Manage. J. 37 (3): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700302.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. Over budget, over time, over and over again. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199563142.003.0014.
Flyvbjerg, B., et al. 2019. “On de-bunking ‘fake news’ in the post-truth era: How to reduce statistical error in research.” Preprint, submitted July 8, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3416731.
Flyvbjerg, B. 2021. “Top ten behavioral biases in project management: An overview.” Project Manage. J. 52 (6): 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211049046.
Flyvbjerg, B., M. S. Holm, and S. Buhl. 2002. “Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie?” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 68 (3): 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273.
Frankel, J. 2011. “Over-optimism in forecasts by official budget agencies and its implications.” Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 27 (4): 536–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grr025.
HM Treasury. 2020. The green book central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. London: Crown.
Ho, G., and P. Mauro. 2014. “Growth: Now and forever?” IMF Working Papers 14 (117): 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498309820.001.
Hoseini, E., P. van Veen, M. Bosch-Rekveldt, and M. Hertogh. 2020. “Cost performance and cost contingency during project execution: Comparing client and contractor perspectives.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (4): 05020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000772.
Hou, D., Q. Meng, and K. C. Chan. 2021. “Does short selling reduce analysts’ optimism bias in earnings forecasts?” Res. Int. Bus. Finance 56 (Jan): 101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101356.
Ismail, K., R. Perrelli, and J. Yang. 2020. “Optimism bias in growth forecasts—The role of planned policy adjustments.” IMF Working Papers 2020 (229): 25. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513560373.001.
Johnson, R. M., and R. I. I. Babu. 2020. “Time and cost overruns in the UAE construction industry: A critical analysis.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 20 (5): 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484864.
Kim, Y. J., and M. J. Skibniewski. 2020. “Unsuccessful bids: Coefficient of variation of bids as indicator of project risk.” Organ. Technol. Manage. Constr. Int. J. 12 (1): 2193–2199. https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0015.
Kutsch, E., H. Maylor, B. Weyer, and J. Lupson. 2011. “Performers, trackers, lemmings and the lost: Sustained false optimism in forecasting project outcomes—Evidence from a quasi-experiment.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (8): 1070–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.010.
Landwehr, T., S. A. Kantoush, C. Pahl-Wostl, T. Sumi, and M. Irie. 2020. “The effect of optimism bias and governmental action on siltation management within Japanese reservoirs surveyed via artificial neural network.” Big Earth Data 4 (1): 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2020.1711632.
Li, Y., Y. Lu, Q. Cui, and Y. Han. 2019. “Organizational behavior in megaprojects: Integrative review and directions for future research.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (4): 04019009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000691.
Love, P. E. D., and D. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui. 2018. “Debunking fake news in a post-truth era: The plausible untruths of cost underestimation in transport infrastructure projects.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 113 (Jul): 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.019.
Love, P. E. D., L. A. Ika, and P. Sing. 2019. “Does the planning fallacy prevail in social infrastructure projects? Empirical evidence and competing explanations.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 69 (6): 2588–2602. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2944161.
Love, P. E. D., J. Smith, I. Simpson, M. Regan, and O. Olatunji. 2015. “Understanding the landscape of overruns in transport infrastructure projects.” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 42 (3): 490–509. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130102p.
McDermott, T. A., D. J. Folds, and L. Hallo. 2020. “Addressing cognitive bias in systems engineering teams.” In Vol. 30 of Proc., INCOSE Int. Symp., 257–271. San Diego: International Council on Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2020.00721.x.
Membah, J., and E. Asa. 2015. “Estimating cost for transportation tunnel projects: A systematic literature review.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 15 (3): 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2015.1067345.
Meyer, W. G. 2014. “The effect of optimism bias on the decision to terminate failing projects.” Project Manage. J. 45 (4): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21435.
Minitab. 2015. “Understanding hypothesis tests: Significance levels (alpha) and P values in statistics” Accessed January 20, 2020. https://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics-2/understanding-hypothesis-tests-significance-levels-alpha-and-p-values-in-statistics.
Musarat, M. A., W. S. Alaloul, M. S. Liew, A. Maqsoom, and A. H. Qureshi. 2020a. “Investigating the impact of inflation on building materials prices in construction industry.” J. Build. Eng. 32 (Nov): 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101485.
Musarat, M. A., W. S. Alaloul, A. H. Qureshi, and M. Altaf. 2020b. “Inflation rate and construction materials prices: Relationship investigation.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), 387–390. New York: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA51403.2020.9317162.
Ohio DOT. 2019. Construction and material specifications. Columbus, OH: Ohio DOT.
Pascual-Leone, A., G. Cattaneo, D. Macià, J. Solana, J. M. Tormos, and D. Bartrés-Faz. 2021. “Beware of optimism bias in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Ann. Neurol. 89 (3): 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.26001.
Prater, J., K. Kirytopoulos, and T. Ma. 2017. “Optimism bias within the project management context.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 10 (2): 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-07-2016-0063.
Sayed, M., M. Abdel-Hamid, and K. El-Dash. 2020. “Improving cost estimation in construction projects.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. (Dec): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1853657.
Sharot, T. 2011. “The optimism bias.” Curr. Biol. 21 (23): R941–R945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030.
Siemiatycki, M. 2018. “The making and impacts of a classic text in megaproject management: The case of cost overrun research.” Int. J. Project Manage. 36 (2): 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.003.
Son, J., and E. M. Rojas. 2011. “Impact of optimism bias regarding organizational dynamics on project planning and control.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (2): 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000260.
Strombotne, K., J. Sindelar, and J. Buckell. 2021. “Who, me? Optimism bias about US teenagers’ ability to quit vaping.” Addiction 116 (11): 3180–3187. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15525.
US Inflation Calculator. n.d. “Current US inflation rates: 2000–2021.” Accessed December 30, 2021. https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/.
Wang, J., X. Zhuang, J. Yang, and J. Sheng. 2014. “The effects of optimism bias in teams.” Appl. Econ. 46 (32): 3980–3994. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.948678.
Weinstein, N. D. 1980. “Unrealistic optimism about future life events.” J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39 (5): 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15Issue 2May 2023

History

Received: Feb 20, 2022
Accepted: Sep 19, 2022
Published online: Jan 23, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Operations and Management, Univ. of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751; formerly, Ph.D. Candidate, Project Management Center for Excellence, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20770 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-468X. Email: [email protected]
Miroslaw J. Skibniewski, Ph.D., M.ASCE
Professor, Project Management Center for Excellence, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20770.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share