Scholarly Papers
Oct 26, 2023

A Context-Specific Study of Construction Sector Anticorruption Framework

Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16, Issue 1

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the sectors with the highest number of corruption cases. Construction workers are subjected to a variety of corrupt practices in the course of their work. Corrupt practices have a negative impact on the construction industry’s growth and performance. Several previous studies have revealed a link between culture and corrupt practices. As a result, a context-specific study with a systematic approach to evaluating corrupt behaviors in the construction business is required. In this light, this study addresses the topic by developing an anticorruption framework based on the perspectives of Indonesian construction professionals. An elaborate approach was used in this research consisting of systematic literature review, questionnaire survey, and expert interviews. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify various aspects of corrupt practices in the construction industry. In order to contextualize this study in the Indonesian context, a questionnaire survey was undertaken to examine the extent of perceptions of corruption aspects among Indonesian construction workers. The synthesis of both findings was used to develop an anticorruption framework that was validated through expert interviews. The framework displays a robust system for identifying corrupt practices, challenges, and strategies for eliminating corruption in the Indonesian construction industry. This study helps to understand the underlying reasons and other aspects of corruption in the Indonesian construction industry. Understanding these aspects is critical in order to solve the rampant corruption in the construction sector.

Practical Applications

The study’s findings can assist stakeholders in understanding various underlying dimensions related to corrupt practices in the construction industry, including (1) general overview of corruption practices, (2) frequency of corruption, (3) forms of corruption, (4) causes of corruption, (5) impact of corruption, (6) mitigation strategies, and (7) challenges in eradicating corrupt practices. A construction sector anticorruption framework was also effectively constructed through a context-specific study in Indonesia. Practically, stakeholders can use the study’s results to take appropriate measures in eradicating corrupt practices and fostering an anticorruption culture in the construction sector. Theoretically, this study contributes by presenting existing corrupt practices in the construction industry and facilitating understanding of the interconstruct relationship of corruption in the industry.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Naomi Vannecia and FX Krissando Budiman for their help in the data collection process.

References

List of Cases

Decision of the Semarang Court Number 32/Pid.Sus/2012/PN.Tipikor.smg.
Decision of the Supreme Court Number 1857 K/PID.SUS/2010.
Decision of the Supreme Court Number 438 K/Pid.Sus/2021.
Decision of the Supreme Court Number 550 K/PID.SUS/2011.

List of Statutes

Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code.
Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes.
Law No. 20 of 2021 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes.
Law No. 24 of 1960 concerning Investigation, Prosecution, and Examination of Corruption Crimes.
Law No. 3 of 1971 concerning Corruption Crimes.
Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption.
Law No. 7 of 2006 concerning Ratification of the 2003 United Nations Convention against Corruption.

Works Cited

Agbiboa, D. E. 2012. “Between corruption and development: The political economy of state robbery in Nigeria.” J. Bus. Ethics 108 (3): 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1093-5.
Agyekum, K., E. Adinyira, and J. Amudjie. 2021. “Ethical misconducts within the invitation to tender and tender evaluation and award stages of construction contracts in Ghana.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 19 (5): 1101–1123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-07-2020-0274.
Alutu, O. E. 2007. “Unethical practices in Nigerian construction industry: Prospective engineers’ viewpoint.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 133 (2): 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(84).
Amoah, C., and D. Steyn. 2022. “Barriers to unethical and corrupt practices avoidance in the construction industry.” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt. 41 (6): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2022-0021.
Ariani, V., D. Y. Jumas, W. P. Utama, and W. W. Wahyudi. 2023. “Indikator penyebab praktik korupsi pada industri konstruksi di sumatera barat.” Rekayasa Sipil 17 (1): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil.2023.017.01.3.
Ariyanti, V. 2019. “Kebebasan hakim dan kepastian hukum dalam menangani perkara pidana di Indonesia.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 4 (2): 162–174.
Badun, M. 2011. “The relationship between political corruption and public investment—The case of Croatia.” Drustvena Istrazivanja 20 (2): 295–316.
Bowen, P. A., P. J. Edwards, and K. Cattell. 2012. “Corruption in the South African construction industry: A thematic analysis of verbatim comments from survey participants.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 30 (10): 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.711909.
Brown, J., and M. Loosemore. 2015. “Behavioral factors influencing corrupt action in the Australian construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (4): 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2015-0034.
Butt, S. 2009. “Asian law in translation: Translator’s note on the Indonesian corruption court law: The unravelling of Indonesia’s anti-corruption framework through law and legal process.” Aust. J. Asian Law 11 (2): 302–307.
Catalão, F. P., C. O. Cruz, and J. M. Sarmento. 2023. “Public sector corruption and accountability in cost deviations and overruns of public projects.” Public Organ. Rev. 23: 1105–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00616-x.
Chan, A. P. C., and E. K. Owusu. 2017. “Corruption forms in the construction industry: Literature review.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (8): 04017057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001353.
Chyung, S. Y., K. Roberts, I. Swanson, and A. Hankinson. 2017. “Evidence-based survey design: The use of a midpoint on the Likert scale.” Perform. Improv. 56 (10): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727.
CIOB (Chartered Institute of Builders). 2013. Corruption in the UK construction industry. London: CIOB.
Damoah, I. S., C. A. Akwei, I. O. Amoako, and D. Botchie. 2018. “Corruption as a source of government project failure in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana.” Project Manage. J. 49 (3): 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818770587.
de Jong, M., W. P. Henry, and N. Stansbury. 2009. “Eliminating corruption in our engineering/construction industry.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 9 (3): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2009)9:3(105).
Foster, J. E., A. W. Horowitz, and F. Méndez. 2012. “An axiomatic approach to the measurement of corruption: Theory and applications.” World Bank Econ. Rev. 26 (2): 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhs008.
Gransberg, D. D. 2020. “Does low bid award facilitate wrongdoing? Implications of Quebec’s Charbonneau commission report.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 12 (1): 03719004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000357.
Gunduz, M., and O. Önder. 2013. “Corruption and internal fraud in the Turkish construction industry.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 19 (2): 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9356-9.
Haboddin, M., and A. I. Rozuli. 2017. “Birokrasi, korupsi, dan kekuasaan.” Jurnal Transformative 3 (1): 1–14.
Hansen, S. 2020. “Investigasi teknik wawancara dalam penelitian kualitatif manajemen konstruksi.” Jurnal Teknik Sipil 27 (3): 283–294. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2020.27.3.10.
Hansen, S., S. F. Rostiyanti, R. Rizaldi, and C. Andjarwati. 2021. “Quantity surveyors’ response to the COVID-19 outbreak: A mixed method approach.” J. Civ. Eng. Forum 7 (2): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.60715.
Hansen, S., P. H. Siregar, and Jevica. 2020. “Analytic hierarchy process-based decision-making framework for formwork system selection by contractors.” J. Constr. Dev. Countries 25 (2): 237–255. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2020.25.2.10.
Hansen, S., E. Too, and T. Le. 2019. “Criteria to consider in selecting and prioritizing infrastructure projects.” In Vol. 270 of Proc., MATEC Web of Conf., 06004. Bandung, Indonesia: Bandung Institute of Technology.
Hansen, S., E. Too, and T. Le. 2022. “An epistemic context-based decision-making framework for an infrastructure project investment decision in Indonesia.” J. Manage. Eng. 38 (4): 05022008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001049.
Hetami, A. A., and M. F. Aransyah. 2020. “Investigation of corruption prevention plan in construction industries.” Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah 8 (1): 51–64. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v8i1.8722.
Hoke, T. 2021. “Zero tolerance for bribery and corruption is still the imperative.” Civ. Eng. 91 (4): 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1061/ciegag.0001574.
ICW (Indonesia Corruption Watch). 2022. Indonesia dan tender infrastruktur 2020: Apa yang terbaca dari data? Jakarta, Indonesia: ICW.
ISO. 2016. Anti-bribery management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. ISO 37001:2016. Geneva: ISO.
Jiménez, F. 2009. “Building boom and political corruption in Spain.” South Eur. Soc. Polit. 14 (3): 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740903356541.
Kombong, E. P., A. S. B. Nugroho, and R. A. Wibowo. 2020. “Pelayanan publik dan kajian putusan korupsi pengadaan jasa konstruksi dalam perspektif kontrak jasa konstruksi.” INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi 6 (2): 245–262. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.665.
Le, Y., M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2014a. “Investigating the causal relationships between causes of and vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (9): 05014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000886.
Le, Y., M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, and Y. Hu. 2014b. “Overview of corruption research in construction.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (4): 02514001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000300.
Lehtinen, J., G. Locatelli, T. Sainati, K. Artto, and B. Evans. 2022. “The grand challenge: Effective anti-corruption measures in projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 40 (Mar): 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.04.003.
Liu, J., Y. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2023. “Multidimensional drivers: Exploring contractor rule violations in the construction industry.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 30 (4): 1496–1518. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2021-0928.
Locatelli, G., G. Mariani, T. Sainati, and M. Greco. 2017. “Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room!” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.010.
Martin, H., A. Miller, A. Milling, and M. Martin. 2022. “Examining corruption prominence in SIDS—The curse and the cure for construction tender practices.” J. Facil. Manage. 21 (3): 387–411.https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-07-2021-0071.
Maulana, I., and M. A. T. Fitriyah. 2023. “Peran dewan pengawas KPK dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia.” Bureaucracy J. 3 (1): 957–973. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.227.
Merkle, O. 2018. “Indonesia: Overview of corruption and anti-corruption.” Transparency International. Accessed January 20, 2023. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Country-profile-Indonesia-2018_PR.pdf.
Muammar, M., and M. Meldandy. 2022. “Penerapan pidana tambahan berupa uang pengganti dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi.” Widya Pranata Hukum 4 (1): 39–64.
Muhtarom, H., C. A. Pratama, and G. Erlangga. 2022. “Akar budaya korupsi Indonesia: Historiografi, penyebab, dan pencegahannya.” Historiography 2 (1): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.17977/um081v2i12022p13-20.
Nelson, F. M. 2022. “In search of a deferred prosecution agreement model for effective anti-corruption framework in Indonesia.” Hasanuddin Law Rev. 8 (2): 122–138. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i2.3292.
Noor, A. 2021. “Legal status of electronic land certificates in the land case proof system in Indonesia.” Int. J. Cyber Criminology 15 (1): 172–187.
Nordin, R. M., R. Takim, and A. H. Nawawi. 2012. “Transparency initiatives (TI) in construction: The social psychology of human behaviours.” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 50 (May): 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.040.
Ogbu, C. P., and C. F. Asuquo. 2018. “Ethical and cost performances of projects: A canonical correlation.” Int. J. Ethics Syst. 34 (3): 352–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2018-0015.
Oladinrin, O. T., C. M. F. Ho, and X. Lin. 2017. “Critical analysis of whistleblowing in construction organizations: Findings from Hong Kong.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9 (2): 04516012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000205.
Owusu, E. K., A. P. C. Chan, O. M. DeGraft, E. E. Ameyaw, and O. K. Robert. 2018. “Contemporary review of anti-corruption measures in construction project management.” Project Manage. J. 50 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818808983.
Owusu, E. K., A. P. C. Chan, and T. Wang. 2021. “Tackling corruption in urban infrastructure procurement: Dynamic evaluation of the critical constructs and the anti-corruption measures.” Cities 119 (2021): 103379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103379.
Rabl, T., and T. M. Kühlmann. 2008. “Understanding corruption in organizations: Development and empirical assessment of an action model.” J. Bus. Ethics 82 (2): 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9898-6.
Romero, J., F. Jimenez, and M. Villoria. 2012. “(Un)sustainable territories: Causes of the speculative bubble in Spain (1996-2010) and its territorial, environmental, and sociopolitical consequences.” Environ. Plann. C: Polit. Spaces 30 (3): 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11193r.
Rostiyanti, S. F., and S. Hansen. 2017. “Perspektif pemilik proyek terhadap permasalahan dalam manajemen klaim konstruksi.” Jurnal Spektran 5 (2): 122–129.
Roy, V., D. Desjardins, C. Ouellet-Plamondon, and C. Fertel. 2021. “Reflection on integrity management while engaging with third parties in the construction and civil engineering industry.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 13 (1): 03720005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000435.
Satria, H. 2020. “Kebijakan kriminal pencegahan korupsi pelayanan publik.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 6 (2): 169–186.
Schoeberlein, J. 2020. Corruption in ASEAN regional trends from the 2020 global corruption barometer and country spotlights. Berlin: Transparency International.
Schütte, S. A. 2016. “Specialised anti-corruption courts: Indonesia.” U4 Brief. Accessed July 25, 2023. https://www.u4.no/publications/specialised-anti-corruption-courts-indonesia.
Sekaran, U., and R. J. Bougie. 2016. Research methods for business: A skill building approach. 7th ed. New York: Wiley.
Shan, M., A. P. C. Chan, Y. Le, B. Xia, and Y. Hu. 2015. “Measuring corruption in public construction projects in China.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 141 (4): 05015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000241.
Sichombo, B., M. Muya, W. Shakantu, and C. Kaliba. 2009. “The need for technical auditing in the Zambian construction industry.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (8): 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.02.001.
Skorupka, D. 2008. “Identification and initial risk assessment of construction projects in Poland.” J. Manage. Eng. 24 (3): 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2008)24:3(120).
Sohail, M., and S. Cavill. 2008. “Accountability to prevent corruption in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (9): 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:9(729).
Stansbury, N. 2005. Exposing the foundations of corruption in construction. Berlin: Global Corruption.
Subedi, B. S. 2016. “Using Likert type data in social science research: Confusion, issues and challenges.” Int. J. Contemp. Appl. Sci. 3 (2): 36–49.
Suraji. 2008. “Sejarah panjang korupsi di Indonesia & upaya pemberantasannya.” Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik 12 (2): 135–148.
Suyatmiko, W., and S. Ratnaningtyas. 2017. Indeks persepsi korupsi Indonesia 2017. Jakarta, Jakarta: Transparency International Indonesia.
Tabish, S. Z. S., and K. N. Jha. 2012. “The impact of anti-corruption strategies on corruption free performance in public construction projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 30 (1): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.654128.
Tanujaya, B., R. C. I. Prahmana, and J. Mumu. 2022. “Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties.” FWU J. Soc. Sci. 16 (4): 89–101.
Tow, D., and M. Loosemore. 2009. “Corporate ethics in the construction and engineering industry.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 1 (3): 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000012.
Tsui, A. S., C. B. Schoonhoven, M. W. Meyer, C. M. Lau, and G. T. Milkovich. 2004. “Organization and management in the midst of societal transformation: The People’s Republic of China.” Organ. Sci. 15 (2): 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0063.
Unruh, J., and M. Shalaby. 2012. “A volatile interaction between peacebuilding priorities: Road infrastructure (re)construction and land rights in Afghanistan.” Prog. Dev. Studies 12 (1): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499341101200103.
Vilhena, P. 2018. “Corruption: Brazil’s everlasting parasite.” Thesis, Political Science Program, Univ. of Central Florida.
Waluyo, B. 2014. “Optimalisasi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Yuridis 1 (2): 169–182.
Wang, Z., J. Liu, and X. Guan. 2022. “Investigating the causal complexity of corruption in project-based organizations: A scenario analysis of bidding activity in the Chinese construction sector.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 29 (10): 3893–3916. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-10-2020-0841.
Wu, Y., Y. Huang, W. Luo, and C. Li. 2014. “Construction supervision mechanism for public projects in China: Progress goal–oriented perspective.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (2): 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000179.
Yap, J. B. H., I. N. Chow, and K. Shavarebi. 2019. “Criticality of construction industry problems in developing countries: Analyzing Malaysian projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (5): 04019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000709.
Yap, J. B. H., K. Y. Lee, and M. Skitmore. 2020. “Analysing the causes of corruption in the Malaysian construction industry.” J. Eng. Des. Technol. 18 (6): 1823–1847. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2020-0037.
Zhang, B., Y. Le, B. Xia, and M. Skitmore. 2017. “Causes of business-to-government corruption in the tendering process in China.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (2): 05016022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000479.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 16Issue 1February 2024

History

Received: May 13, 2023
Accepted: Sep 8, 2023
Published online: Oct 26, 2023
Published in print: Feb 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Mar 26, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lecturer, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, Universitas Agung Podomoro, Jakarta 11470, Indonesia; Master’s Student, Dept. of Master of Law Science, Universitas Pamulang, South Tangerang 15417, Indonesia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3474-6065. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share