Technical Papers
Jan 10, 2024

Sensitivity Analysis of AquaCrop Model for Winter Wheat in Different Water Supply Conditions

Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 2

Abstract

AquaCrop, a water-driven model, has been developed to simulate the response of crops, including wheat, to the amount of irrigation water. To estimate crop yield using this model, the calibration stage is applied first, employing the available data. Calibration accuracy guarantees the validation accuracy of this model. For this reason, before the calibration stage, the response of the AquaCrop model to changes in input parameters is investigated using sensitivity analysis. Most researchers use additive-subtractive methods. However, these methods do not provide much information about model sensitivity. In this research, three methods were used to analyze the sensitivity of AquaCrop to simulate winter wheat grain yield under different irrigation requirements. The methods included (1) an increasing-decreasing method; (2) a limit method; and (3) a Gamma test that was based on the nonlinear relationship between inputs and outputs. The irrigation treatments were 100%, 75%, 50%, and 0% of the irrigation requirement and were designated as I1, I2, I3, and I4. Six input parameters consisting of normalized water productivity (WP*), maximum crop coefficient for transpiration (KCTR), initial canopy cover (CCo), crop canopy growth coefficient (CGC), crop canopy decline coefficient (CDC) and harvest index (HI) were evaluated for sensitivity analysis. The results showed that the sensitivity of the AquaCrop model was extremely high to WP* changes and moderate to CCo changes. An inverse relationship between wheat grain yield and CDC and a direct relationship between wheat grain yield and other input parameters were observed. The sensitivity of the AquaCrop model to the CCo parameter was the same in all irrigation treatments. The increase in water stress decreased the sensitivity of the AquaCrop model to the input parameters. Therefore, in the case of large differences between simulated and observed grain yield, it is suggested to change WP* and Kctr values. In the condition of moderate difference, it is better to change two parameters, HI and CDC. To reduce the slight difference between the simulated and observed grain yield, it is suggested to change the two parameters, CGC and CCo. It should be noted that the results of the sensitivity analysis are specific to the experimental conditions, such as plant density, soil texture, and water supply, and may vary when applied to different regions. Therefore, it is recommended to obtain region-specific results and determine the sensitivity of the AquaCrop model to input parameters.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Additional data can only be made available to crop modeler. Details of the data and how to request access are available from Mohsen Ahmadee.

References

Ahmadee, M., M. Ghanbarpouri, and A. Egdernezhad. 2021. “Applied irrigation water of wheat using sensitivity analysis and evaluation of aqua crop.” [In Persian.] Water Manage. Agric. 8 (1): 15–30.
Alizadeh, F. 2020. “Investigating of different irrigation management strategies to increase production and improve water productivity of rapeseed and wheat (case study: Khorramabad).” [In Persian.] M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Water Engineering, Lorestan Univ.
Anonymous. 2009. Guideline for soil survey. Vice presidency for planning and supervision. [In Persian.] Tehran, Iran: Ministry of Agriculture Jihad.
Ebrahimipak, N., M. Ahmadee, A. Egdernezhad, and A. Khashei Siuki. 2018. “Evaluation of AquaCrop to simulate saffron (crocus sativus L.) yield under different water management scenarios and zeolite amount.” [In Persian.] J. Water Soil Resour. Conserv. 8 (1): 117–132.
Ebrahimipak, N., A. Egdernezhad, A. Tafteh, and M. Ahmadee. 2019. “Evaluation of AquaCrop, WOFOST, and cropsyst to simulate rapeseed yield.” [In Persian.] Iran. J. Irrig. Drain. 13 (3–75): 715–726.
Erenstein, O., J. Chamberlin, and K. Sonder. 2021. “Estimating the global number and distribution of maize and wheat farms.” Global Food Secur. 30 (Aug): 100558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100558.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2023. “AquaCrop reference manual.” Accessed December 18, 2023. https://www.fao.org/aquacrop/resources/referencemanuals/en/.
FAOSTAT. 2017. “FAO, Rome.” Accessed December 18, 2023. http://www.fao.org/faostat.
FAOSTAT. 2021. “FAO, Rome.” Accessed December 18, 2023. http://www.fao.org/faostat.
Geerts, S., D. Raes, M. Garcia, R. Miranda, and J. A. Cusicanqui. 2009. “Simulating yield response to water of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) with FAO-AquaCrop.” Agronomy 101 (Sep): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0137s.
Geng, S. M., D. H. Yan, Z. B. Zhang, Z. L. Wang, and A. Girmad. 2017. “Performance assessment and application of the DSSAT-CERES-Maize model for simulating maize yield under water stress conditions.” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 82 (1): 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/82/1/012030.
Guo, D., R. Zhao, X. Xing, and X. Ma. 2019. “Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the AquaCrop model for maize under different irrigation and fertilizer management conditions.” Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 66 (8): 1–19.
Haji Rahimi, M. 2014. “Investigating the effects of government monopoly on the market and marketing of wheat products: Application of policy analysis matrix.” [In Persian.] J. Mark. Manage. 1 (2): 89–102.
Iran Water Resources Management. 2022. Introducing the country’s water information and data office. Tehran, Iran: Iran Water Resources Management.
Jin, X., H. Feng, X. Zhu, Z. Li, S. Song, X. Song, G.-J. Yang, X. Xu, and W. Guo. 2014. “Assessment of the AquaCrop model for use in simulation of irrigated winter wheat canopy cover, biomass, and grain yield in the North China Plain.” PLoS One 9 (8): e86938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086938.
Jin, X., Z. Li, C. Nie, X. Xu, H. Feng, W. Guo, and J. Wang. 2018. “Parameter sensitivity analysis of the AquaCrop model based on extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity under different agro-meteorological conditions and application.” Field Crops Res. 226 (Sep): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07.002.
Kim, D., and J. Kaluarachchi. 2015. “Validating FAO AquaCrop using Landsat images and regional crop information.” Agric. Water Manage. 149 (10): 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.013.
Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, and H. Frede. 2002. “Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis.” Phys. Chem. Earth 27 (9–10): 645–654.
McCuen, R. H. 1974. “A sensitivity and error analysis cf procedures used for estimating evaporation.” Water Resour. Bull. 10 (3): 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1974.tb00590.x.
Mebane, V. J., R. L. Day, J. M. Hamlett, J. E. Watson, and G. W. Roth. 2013. “Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for rainfed maize in Pennsylvania.” Agron. J. 105 (2): 419–427. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0337.
Mkhabela, M. S., and P. R. Bullock. 2012. “Performance of the FAO AquaCrop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in Western Canada.” Agric. Water Manage. 110 (Jul): 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.009.
Mojaverian, S. M., F. Mojtahedi, T. Ranjbar Malekshah, and A. R. Khadijeh. 2021. “Determining the optimal pattern for production and import of wheat in Iran: Application of goal programming.” [In Persian.] Agric. Econ. 15 (3): 77–96.
Raes, D., P. Steduto, T. C. Hsiao, and E. Fereres. 2009. “AquaCrop—The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water II. Main algorithms and software description.” Agron. J. 101 (Jun): 438–447. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0140s.
Remesan, R., M. A. Shamim, and D. Han. 2008. “Model data selection using gamma test for daily solar radiation estimation.” Hydrol. Process. 22 (5): 4301–4309. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7044.
Salemi, H., M. A. Mohd Soom, T. S. Lee, S. F. Mousavi, A. Ganji, and M. KamilYusoff. 2011. “Application of AquaCrop model in deficit irrigation management of Winter wheat in arid region.” Afr. J. Agric. Res. 610 (Jun): 2204–2215.
Shabani, F., G. A. Kamali, and A. R. Sepaskhah. 2016. “Evaluation of AquaCrop model for wheat yield simulation under different irrigation management scenarios in a semi-arid region.” Agric. Water Manage. 166 (Aug): 1–11.
Soddu, A., R. Deidda, M. Marrocu, R. Meloni, C. Paniconi, R. Ludwig, M. Sodde, G. Mascaro, and E. Perra. 2013. “Climate variability and durum wheat adaptation using the AquaCrop model in southern Sardinia.” Procedia Environ. Sci. 19 (Jan): 830–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.092.
Statistical Center of Iran. 2018. “The results of the agriculture statistics project.” Accessed November 16, 2019. https://www.amar.org.ir/english.
Statistical Center of Iran. 2022. “The results of the agriculture statistics project.” Accessed September 24, 2022. https://www.amar.org.ir/english.
Steduto, P., T. C. Hsiao, D. Raes, and E. Fereres. 2009. “Aquacrop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles.” Agron. J. 101 (Apr): 426–437. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0139s.
Yaghoobzadeh, M., M. Ahmadee, S. Boroomand Nasab, and A. Haghayeghi Maghamam. 2017a. “Impact of climate change on changing trend of evapotranspiration during the growth period of irrigated and rainfed field crops by AOGCM models.” [In Persian.] Iran. J. Water Res. Agric. 30 (4): 511–523.
Yaghoobzadeh, M., M. Ahmadee, H. Seyyed Kaboli, G. H. R. Zamani, and M. Amirabadizadeh. 2017b. “The evaluation of effect of climate change agricultural drought using ETDI and SPI indexes.” [In Persian.] J. Water Soil Conserv. 24 (4): 43–61.
Zeeshan Shirazi, S., X. Xurong Mei, B. Liu, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Assessment of the AquaCrop Model under different irrigation scenarios in the North China Plain.” Agric. Water Manage. 257 (Jun): 107120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107120.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 150Issue 2April 2024

History

Received: Dec 12, 2022
Accepted: Sep 27, 2023
Published online: Jan 10, 2024
Published in print: Apr 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jun 10, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ali Heydar Nasrolahi [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Lorestan Univ., Khorramabad 6815144316, Iran (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mohsen Ahmadee [email protected]
Agricultural Engineering, Irrigation and Drainage, Khorramabad, Lorestan 6815865386, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Heriot-Watt Univ., Dubai Campus, Dubai Knowledge Park, P.O. Box 38103, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6938-8144

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share