Technical Papers
Jul 8, 2024

Modeling High Pan Evaporation Losses Using Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Processes, and Regression Tree Models

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 5

Abstract

Evaporation is considered to be one of the most influential hydrological processes, contributing significantly to water loss within the hydrological cycle. This study aimed to address the challenge of modeling daily pan evaporation in arid climates, where harsh hydroclimatic conditions hinder modeling efficacy. In such climates, annual pan evaporation rates exceed 3,500 mm, exacerbating water scarcity in agricultural basins. Three machine-learning techniques: regression trees, Gaussian processes, and support vector machine regression were employed to model daily pan evaporation rates at two meteorological stations in Kuwait. Various meteorological variables, including average diurnal temperature, average wind speed, and average relative humidity, were utilized to formulate different modeling scenarios. The three modeling methods demonstrated robust efficiency in simulating historical pan evaporation under varied input formulations. In addition, the data-driven models were shown to outperform physically and statistically based conventional evaporation modeling methods. The mean absolute error (MAE) and coefficient of determination (R2) ranged from 2.04 to 2.84  mm/day and 0.73–0.85, respectively. Notably, a bias in model predictions was observed for daily pan evaporation rates exceeding 25  mm/day. A probabilistic assessment of model skill for operational forecasts on a weekly time scale affirmed the suitability of the selected data-driven models for operational and water management decision-making. This study sought to equip water managers in arid regions with powerful tools to formulate resilient water strategies mitigating the detrimental effects of water scarcity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

References

Abusada, S. M. 1988. The essentials of groundwater resources of Kuwait. Kuwait: Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research.
Almedeij, J. 2016a. “Long-term periodic drought modeling.” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 30 (Mar): 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1065-x.
Almedeij, J. 2016b. “Modeling pan evaporation for Kuwait using multiple linear regression and time-series techniques.” Am. J. Appl. Sci. 13 (6): 739–747. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.739.747.
Almedeij, J. 2017. “Thornthwaite-Holzman model for a wide range of daily evaporation rates.” Int. J. Water 11 (4): 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJW.2017.088042.
Alrumaidhi, M., M. M. G. Farag, and H. A. Rakha. 2023. “Comparative analysis of parametric and non-parametric data-driven models to predict road crash severity among elderly drivers using synthetic resampling techniques.” Sustainability 15 (13): 9878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15139878.
Alrumaidhi, M., and H. A. Rakha. 2022. “Factors affecting crash severity among elderly drivers: A multilevel ordinal logistic regression approach.” Sustainability 14 (18): 11543. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811543.
Alsumaiei, A. A. 2020a. “Monitoring hydrometeorological droughts using a simplified precipitation index.” Climate 8 (2): 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8020019.
Alsumaiei, A. A. 2020b. “Utility of artificial neural networks in modeling pan evaporation in hyper-arid climates.” Water 12 (5): 1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051508.
Brutsaert, W. 2023. Hydrology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Burman, R. D. 1976. “Intercontinental comparison of evaporation estimates.” J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 102 (1): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1061/JRCEA4.0001076.
Cherkassky, V., and Y. Ma. 2004. “Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression.” Neural Networks 17 (1): 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00169-2.
Cortes, C., and V. Vapnik. 1995. “Support-vector networks.” Mach. Learn. 20 (Sep): 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018.
Deringer, V. L., A. P. Bartók, N. Bernstein, D. M. Wilkins, M. Ceriotti, and G. Csányi. 2021. “Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules.” Chem. Rev. 121 (16): 10073–10141. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00022.
Donohue, R. J., T. R. McVicar, and M. L. Roderick. 2010. “Assessing the ability of potential evaporation formulations to capture the dynamics in evaporative demand within a changing climate.” J. Hydrol. 386 (1–4): 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.020.
El Bilali, A., T. Abdeslam, N. Ayoub, H. Lamane, M. A. Ezzaouini, and A. Elbeltagi. 2023. “An interpretable machine learning approach based on DNN, SVR, Extra Tree, and XGBoost models for predicting daily pan evaporation.” J. Environ. Manage. 327 (Feb): 116890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116890.
Ghumman, A. R., M. Jamaan, A. Ahmad, M. Shafiquzzaman, H. Haider, I. S. Al Salamah, and Y. M. Ghazaw. 2021. “Simulation of pan-evaporation using penman and hamon equations and artificial intelligence techniques.” Water 13 (6): 793. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060793.
Irmak, S., D. Z. Haman, and J. W. Jones. 2002. “Evaluation of class A pan coefficients for estimating reference evapotranspiration in humid location.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 128 (3): 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:3(153).
Jahangir, M. S., S. M. Biazar, D. Hah, J. Quilty, and M. Isazadeh. 2022. “Investigating the impact of input variable selection on daily solar radiation prediction accuracy using data-driven models: A case study in northern Iran.” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 36 (5): 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02070-5.
Kisi, O., and M. Cimen. 2011. “A wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model for monthly streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrol. 399 (Dec): 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.041.
Kumar, M., A. Kumari, D. Kumar, N. Al-Ansari, R. Ali, R. Kumar, A. Kumar, A. Elbeltagi, and A. Kuriqi. 2021. “The superiority of data-driven techniques for estimation of daily pan evaporation.” Atmosphere 12 (6): 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12060701.
Kumar, R., M. Ahmed, B. Garudachari, and J. P. Thomas. 2020. “Synthesis and evaluation of nanocomposite forward osmosis membranes for Kuwait seawater desalination.” Desalin. Water Treat. 176 (Feb): 273–279. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25529.
Ma, Y., and G. Guo. 2014. Support vector machines applications. Berlin: Springer.
Piri, J., S. Amin, A. Moghaddamnia, A. Keshavarz, D. Han, and R. Remesan. 2009. “Daily pan evaporation modeling in a hot and dry climate.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (Jul): 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000056.
Qasem, S. N., S. Samadianfard, S. Kheshtgar, S. Jarhan, O. Kisi, S. Shamshirband, and K.-W. Chau. 2019. “Modeling monthly pan evaporation using wavelet support vector regression and wavelet artificial neural networks in arid and humid climates.” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 13 (1): 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1564702.
Rosenberry, D. O., T. C. Winter, D. C. Buso, and G. E. Likens. 2007. “Comparison of 15 evaporation methods applied to a small mountain lake in the northeastern USA.” J. Hydrol. 340 (3–4): 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.018.
Rotstayn, L. D., M. L. Roderick, and G. D. Farquhar. 2006. “A simple pan-evaporation model for analysis of climate simulations: Evaluation over Australia.” Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 (17): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027114.
Shabani, S., S. Samadianfard, M. T. Sattari, A. Mosavi, S. Shamshirband, T. Kmet, and A. R. Várkonyi-Kóczy. 2020. “Modeling pan evaporation using Gaussian process regression K-nearest neighbors random forest and support vector machines; comparative analysis.” Atmosphere 11 (1): 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010066.
Sivapragasam, C., S.-Y. Liong, and M. F. K. Pasha. 2001. “Rainfall and runoff forecasting with SSA–SVM approach.” J. Hydroinformatics 3 (Jun): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2001.0014.
Wen, L., J. Ling, N. Saintilan, and K. Rogers. 2009. “An investigation of the hydrological requirements of River Red Gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) Forest, using Classification and Regression Tree modelling.” Ecohydrol. Ecosyst. L. Water Process Interact. Ecohydrogeomorphology 2 (Apr): 143–155.
Wilkes, M. A., I. Maddock, O. Link, and E. Habit. 2016. “A community-level, mesoscale analysis of fish assemblage structure in shoreline habitats of a large river using multivariate regression trees.” River Res. Appl. 32 (4): 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2879.
Yang, H., and D. Yang. 2012. “Climatic factors influencing changing pan evaporation across China from 1961 to 2001.” J. Hydrol. 414 (Jan): 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.043.
Zhou, F., Y. Xu, Y. Chen, C.-Y. Xu, Y. Gao, and J. Du. 2013. “Hydrological response to urbanization at different spatio-temporal scales simulated by coupling of CLUE-S and the SWAT model in the Yangtze River Delta region.” J. Hydrol. 485 (Apr): 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.040.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29Issue 5October 2024

History

Received: Dec 15, 2023
Accepted: Apr 22, 2024
Published online: Jul 8, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 8, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait Univ., P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9148-3954. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share