Technical Papers
Jul 5, 2024

Unveiling the Dynamics of Hydrosuction Sediment Removal: Insight into Flow Characteristics, Flow Profile, and Critical Suction Velocity

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 5

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the critical suction velocity required for lifting sediment off the bed under hydrosuction. Flow characteristics below the suction pipe under unbound and bound conditions were studied experimentally and numerically, and the effects of various parameters on the critical suction velocity, such as suction pipe diameter, suction discharge, suction inlet height, and sediment size, were investigated. The results showed all the parameters significantly affect the critical suction velocity, with suction inlet height being the most influential. Unbound and bound conditions yielded divergent flow characteristics beneath the suction pipe, revealing distinct flow patterns. Interdependency among the parameters affecting critical suction velocity have been studied statistically, and empirical relations are developed to compute the critical suction velocity, its resultant centerline velocity, and the associated flow profile. A proposed relation for critical suction velocity showcased a ±10% error margin, while equations computed resultant centerline velocities and flow profiles with ±15% accuracy, representing satisfactory agreement. These findings can also be helpful in designing efficient suction systems in various sediment-laden water environments.

Practical Applications

The current study on hydrosuction sediment removal presents practical solutions for addressing the persistent challenge of reservoir sedimentation. Hydrosuction is an efficient and cost-effective method of sediment removal with minimum disturbance to the connecting structures and surrounding ecosystem and aquatic life, ensuring sustainable reservoir management. The study focuses on providing detailed insight into the behavior of the flow below the suction pipe under varying conditions, which is responsible for sediment movement during hydrosuction. The study also investigates the minimum suction velocity required to lift the sediment off the bed surface. Applicability of hydrosuction is not limited to the desilting of a reservoir; it also holds potential for various applications in multiple fields, such as river and canal restoration, dredging of navigational channels, irrigation canal cleaning, dewatering and slurry removal, contaminant cleanup, trench excavation, flood control, and wastewater management.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The relevant information about this study and the experimental data is in the tables and figures in the paper. All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We express deep gratitude and sincere thanks to the Department of Water Resources Development and Management, IIT Roorkee, and the Civil Engineering Department, IIT Roorkee, for providing a conducive environment and resources to conduct the research and analysis work.
Author contributions: The authors of this paper have made significant contributions to its development. The corresponding author, Mr. Akash Jaiswal, conducted the experimental work, collected and analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. Meanwhile, the other authors, Professor Zulfequar Ahmad and Professor Surendra Kumar Mishra, provided valuable guidance, assisted with data analysis, and played a crucial role in finalizing the manuscript. All the authors’ contributions were integral to the successful completion of this work.

References

Aguirre-Pe, J., M. L. Olivero, and A. T. Moncada. 2003. “Particle densimetric Froude number for estimating sediment transport.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 129 (6): 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:6(428).
Ali, S. Z., and S. Dey. 2017. “Origin of the scaling laws of sediment transport.” Proc. R. Soc. A 473 (2197): 20160785. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0785.
Asiaban, P., S. Kouchakzadeh, and S. Asiaban. 2017. “Enhanced hydro-suction performance for cohesive sediment removal in low-head reservoirs.” Ain Shams Eng. J. 8 (4): 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.07.001.
Belikov, V. V., N. M. Borisova, T. A. Fedorova, O. A. Petrovskaya, and V. M. Katolikov. 2019. “On the effect of the Froude number and hydromorphometric parameters on sediment transport in rivers.” Water Resour. 46 (Mar): S20–S28. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807819070029.
Brahme, S. B., and J. B. Herbich. 1986. “Hydraulic model studies for suction cutterheads.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 112 (5): 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1986)112:5(591).
Bulat, M. P., and P. V. Bulat. 2013. “Comparison of turbulence models in the calculation of supersonic separated flows.” World Appl. Sci. J. 27 (10): 1263–1266. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.27.10.13715.
Chen, S.-C., S.-C. Wang, and C.-H. Wu. 2010. “Sediment removal efficiency of siphon dredging with wedge-type suction head and float tank.” Int. J. Sediment Res. 25 (2): 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(10)60034-0.
Conesa-García, C., C. Puig-Mengual, A. Riquelme, R. Tomás, F. Martínez-Capel, R. García-Lorenzo, J. L. Pastor, P. Pérez-Cutillas, A. Martínez-Salvador, and M. Cano-Gonzalez. 2022. “Changes in stream power and morphological adjustments at the event-scale and high spatial resolution along an ephemeral gravel-bed channel.” Geomorphology 398 (Mar): 108053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108053.
Davidson, A. A., and S. M. Salim. 2018. “Wall y+ strategy for modelling rotating annular flow using CFD.” In Proc., Int. Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS 2018. Hong Kong: Newswood.
Davidson, A. A., and S. M. Salim. 2020. “CFD modelling of rotating annular flow using wall y+.” In Proc., Transactions on Engineering Technologies: Int. MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2018, 318–330. New York: Springer.
Dekker, M. A., N. P. Kruyt, M. den Burger, and W. J. Vlasblom. 2003. “Experimental and numerical investigation of cutter head dredging flows.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 129 (5): 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2003)129:5(203).
Dey, S. 1999. “Sediment threshold.” Appl. Math. Modell. 23 (5): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(98)10081-1.
Dey, S., S. Z. Ali, and E. Padhi. 2020. “Hydrodynamic lift on sediment particles at entrainment: Present status and its prospect.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 146 (6): 03120001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001751.
Dey, S., H. K. D. Sarker, and K. Debnath. 1999. “Sediment threshold under stream flow on horizontal and sloping beds.” J. Eng. Mech. 125 (5): 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:5(545).
Elgamal, M., and H. Fouli. 2020. “Sediment removal from dam reservoirs using syphon suction action.” Arabian J. Geosci. 13 (18): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05955-x.
Goertler, H. 1942. “Berechnung von Aufgaben der freien Turbulenz auf Grund eines neuen Naherungsansatzes.” J. Appl. Math. Mech. 22 (18): 244–254.
Hayes, D. F., T. R. Crockett, T. J. Ward, and D. Averett. 2000. “Sediment resuspension during cutterhead dredging operations.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 126 (3): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2000)126:3(153).
Henriksen, J., R. Randall, and S. Socolofsky. 2012. “Near-field resuspension model for a cutter suction dredge.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 138 (3): 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000122.
Herbich, J. B. 1971. “Dredging methods for deep-ocean mineral recovery.” J. Waterways, Harbors, Coastal Eng. Div. 97 (2): 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1061/AWHCAR.0000088.
Hotchkiss, R. H., and X. Huang. 1995. “Hydrosuction sediment-removal systems (HSRS): Principles and field test.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 121 (6): 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1995)121:6(479).
Jaiswal, A., Z. Ahmad, and S. K. Mishra. 2022a. “Effect of diameter and inlet-depth on hydro-suction performance of a suction pipe.” In Proc., 9th IAHR Int. Symp. on Hydraulic Structures, 8. Logan, UT: Utah State Univ.
Jaiswal, A., Z. Ahmad, and S. K. Mishra. 2022b. “Hydro-suctioning of sediment: Scour profile investigation and flow field visualization using CFD.” In Vol. 2022 of Proc., AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Jaiswal, A., Z. Ahmad, and S. K. Mishra. 2022c. “Removal of sediment through hydro-suction revisited: An extensive review of the hydro-suctioning method, widely used for sediment removal from the water bodies.” Water Pract. Technol. 17 (6): 1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2022.060.
Jaiswal, A., S. K. Mishra, and Z. Ahmad. 2023. “A study on hydro-suction method for sediment removal from reservoirs.” Water Energy Int. 65 (11): 75.
Ke, W.-T., Y.-W. Chen, H.-C. Hsu, K. Toigo, W.-C. Weng, and H. Capart. 2016. “Influence of sediment consolidation on hydrosuction performance.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (10): 04016037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001143.
Kmecova, M., O. Sikula, and M. Krajcik. 2019. “Circular free jets: CFD simulations with various turbulence models and their comparison with theoretical solutions.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 471 (6): 062045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/6/062045.
Menter, F., and C. Rumsey. 1994. “Assessment of two-equation turbulence models for transonic flows.” In Proc., Fluid Dynamics Conf., 2343. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-2343.
Mousa, H. M., S. S. Muhsun, and Z. T. Al-Sharify. 2020. “Two phase flow experimental detection method and CFD models—A review.” J. Eng. Sustainable Dev. 24 (5): 9–18. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.24.5.2.
Pishgar, R., S. A. Ayyoubzadeh, M. Ghodsian, and M. Saneie. 2018. “The influence of burrowing-type suction pipe geometrical and mechanical specifications on the hydro-suction method performance.” ISH J. Hydraul. Eng. 27 (6): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1531732.
Rajaratnam, N. 1976. Turbulent jets. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Raudkivi, A. J. 1988. “The roughness height under waves.” J. Hydraul. Res. 26 (5): 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221688809499194.
Rehbinder, G. 1994. “Sediment removal with a siphon at critical flux.” J. Hydraul. Res. 32 (6): 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689409498694.
Sadatomi, M., T. Nagano, and A. Kawahara. 2015. “Siphonic removal of sediments in water reservoirs—Additional experiment for model revision.” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 6 (6): 409. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2015.V6.627.
Salzmann, H., and G. M. Adam. 1977. Fluid and soil mechanics processes during hydraulic dredging. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ.
Sharma, I., A. Mishra, and R. Mehrotra. 2021. “Performance evaluation of impact stilling basin using ansys fluent.” In Advances in water resources and transportation engineering, lecture notes in civil engineering, edited by Y. A. Mehta, I. Carnacina, D. N. Kumar, K. R. Rao, and M. Kumari, 149. Singapore: Springer.
Shrestha, H. S. 2012. “Application of hydro-suction sediment removal system (HSRS) on peaking ponds.” Hydro Nepal 11 (Jun): 43–48. https://doi.org/10.3126/hn.v11i0.7162.
Tollmien, W. 1926. “Berechnung turbulenter Ausbreitungsvorgange.” J. Appl. Math. Mech. 6 (Mar): 468–478.
Ullah, S. M., K. A. Mazurek, N. Rajaratnam, and S. Reitsma. 2005. “Siphon removal of cohesionless materials.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 131 (3): 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2005)131:3(115).
Wiberg, P. L., and J. D. Smith. 1987. “Calculations of the critical shear stress for motion of uniform and heterogeneous sediments.” Water Resour. Res. 23 (8): 1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR023i008p01471.
Winterwerp, J. C. 2002. “Near-field behavior of dredging spill in shallow water.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 128 (2): 96–98. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2002)128:2(96).
Yang, P., G. Wang, and L. Zhong. 2020. “Suction removal of cohesionless sediment.” Energies 13 (20): 5436. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205436.
Yang, X. L., and X. P. Long. 2012. “Numerical investigation on the jet pump performance based on different turbulence models.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 15 (5): 052019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/15/5/052019.
Zhou, Y., Y. Zhang, P. Tang, Y. Chen, and D. Z. Zhu. 2013. “Experimental study of the performance of a siphon sediment cleansing set in a CSO chamber.” Water Sci. Technol. 68 (1): 184–191. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.238.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 150Issue 5September 2024

History

Received: Aug 13, 2023
Accepted: Apr 26, 2024
Published online: Jul 5, 2024
Published in print: Sep 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 5, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Scholar, Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 274667, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-9322. Email: [email protected]
Zulfequar Ahmad
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 274667, India.
Surendra Kumar Mishra
Professor, Water Resources Development and Management, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand 274667, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share