Technical Papers
Sep 25, 2024

Improved Estimation of the Seismically Induced Active Earth Thrust on a Cantilever Retaining Wall at the Preliminary Design Stage

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150, Issue 12

Abstract

Numerical investigation of free-standing cantilever walls subjected to horizontal seismic loads was carried out using nonlinear elastoplastic finite-element approach. The numerical model was validated using centrifuge tests and a numerical study. This study emphasizes the acceleration response, deformation mechanism, and active earth thrust (Pae) of seismically induced cantilever retaining walls. A detailed parametric study was conducted to analyze the effect of the entire earthquake motion, wall dimensions, and soil characteristics on the active earth thrust behind the wall stem (Pae_stem) and along the virtual plane passing through the wall heel (Pae_vp). The study found that the Pae_stem and Pae_vp decrease with an increase in peak ground acceleration (PGA) up to approximately 0.55 g because they are impacted significantly by the translational and rotational displacement of the cantilever wall. In addition, the magnitude of Pae_stem is smaller than that of Pae_vp. Based on the parametric investigation and regression analysis, an equation for Pae_stem and Pae_vp is proposed and was verified by comparing it with the results of the finite-element study and existing numerical work. The proposed equation provides improved prediction of the active earth thrust of a cantilever wall at an early design stage.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The FE analysis results and earth pressure calculation details are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Al Atik, L., and N. Sitar. 2010. “Seismic earth pressures on cantilever retaining structures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136 (10): 1324–1333. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000351.
Anderson, D. G., G. R. Martin, I. P. Lam, and J. N. Wang. 2008. Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Bakr, J., S. M. Ahmad, and D. Lombardi. 2019. “Finite-element study for seismic structural and global stability of cantilever-type retaining walls.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (10): 04019117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001505.
Bentler, J. G., and J. F. Labuz. 2006. “Performance of a cantilever retaining wall.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1062–1070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1062).
Benz, T. 2007. Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences. Stuttgart, Germany: Univ. of Stuttgart.
Brinkgreve, R. B. J., E. Engin, and H. K. Engin. 2010. “Validation of empirical formulas to derive model parameters for sands.” In Proc., 7th Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, 137–142. London: CRC Press.
Cakir, T. 2013. “Evaluation of the effect of earthquake frequency content on seismic behavior of cantilever retaining wall including soil–structure interaction.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 45 (Feb): 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.11.008.
Campbell, K. W., and Y. Bozorgnia. 2019. “Ground motion models for the horizontal components of Arias intensity (AI) and cumulative absolute velocity (CAV) using the NGA-West2 database.” Earthquake Spectra 35 (3): 1289–1310. https://doi.org/10.1193/090818EQS212M.
Chen, F.-Q., H.-B. Chen, L. Xu, and L.-B. Lin. 2022. “Seismic pseudo-static active earth pressure of narrow granular backfill against an inverted T-type retaining wall under translational mode.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 152 (Jan): 107018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.107018.
Choudhury, D., and S. S. Nimbalkar. 2006. “Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 24 (5): 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-1134-x.
Craig, R. F. 2004. Craig’s soil mechanics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Goh, A. T. C. 1993. “Behavior of cantilever retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Eng. 119 (11): 1751–1770. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:11(1751).
Greco, V. R. 2008. “Analytical active earth thrust on cantilever walls with short heel.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (12): 1649–1658. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-078.
Green, R. A., and R. M. Ebeling. 2002. “Seismic analysis of cantilever retaining walls, Phase I.” Rep. No. ERDC/ITL TR-02-3. Washington, DC: USACE.
Green, R. A., C. G. Olgun, and W. I. Cameron. 2008. “Response and modeling of cantilever retaining walls subjected to seismic motions.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 23 (4): 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00538.x.
Gupta, A., and V. A. Sawant. 2021. “Effect of soil amplification on seismic earth pressure using pseudo-dynamic approach.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 15 (1): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1476803.
Hardin, B. O., and V. P. Drnevich. 1972. “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 98 (7): 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760.
IBC (International Building Code). 2012. International Building Code. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council.
IBC (International Building Code). 2021. 2021 International Building Code. Country Club Hills, IL: International Code Council.
Ishibashi, I., and Y.-S. Fang. 1987. “Dynamic earth pressures with different wall movement modes.” Soils Found. 27 (4): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.27.4_11.
Jo, S.-B., J.-G. Ha, J.-S. Lee, and D.-S. Kim. 2017. “Evaluation of the seismic earth pressure for inverted T-shape stiff retaining wall in cohesionless soils via dynamic centrifuge.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 92 (Jan): 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.009.
Jo, S.-B., J.-G. Ha, M. Yoo, Y. W. Choo, and D.-S. Kim. 2014. “Seismic behavior of an inverted T-shape flexible retaining wall via dynamic centrifuge tests.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 12 (2): 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9558-9.
Kamiloğlu, H. A., and E. Sadoğlu. 2019. “A method for active seismic earth thrusts of granular backfill acting on cantilever retaining walls.” Soils Found. 59 (2): 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.12.003.
Kloukinas, P., A. Scotto di Santolo, A. Penna, M. Dietz, A. Evangelista, A. L. Simonelli, C. Taylor, and G. Mylonakis. 2015. “Investigation of seismic response of cantilever retaining walls: Limit analysis vs shaking table testing.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 77 (Oct): 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.018.
Kolathayar, S., and P. Ghosh. 2009. “Seismic active earth pressure on walls with bilinear backface using pseudo-dynamic approach.” Comput. Geotech. 36 (7): 1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.05.015.
Koseki, J., Y. Munaf, T. Sato, F. Tatsuoka, M. Tateyama, and K. Kojima. 1998. “Shaking and tilt table tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil and conventional-type retaining walls.” Geosynth. Int. 5 (1–2): 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.5.0115.
Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kuhlemeyer, R. L., and J. Lysmer. 1973. “Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 99 (5): 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001885.
Lysmer, J., and R. L. Kuhlemeyer. 1969. “Finite dynamic model for infinite media.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 95 (4): 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001144.
Madabhushi, S. P. G., and X. Zeng. 2007. “Simulating seismic response of cantilever retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (5): 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:5(539).
Masing, G. 1926. “Eigenspannumyen und verfeshungung beim messing.” In Proc., Int. Congress for Applied Mechanics, 332–335. Berlin: Springer.
Mikola, R. G., G. Candia, and N. Sitar. 2016. “Seismic earth pressure on retaining structures and basements walls in cohesionless soils.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 142 (10): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001507.
Mikola, R. G., and N. Sitar. 2013. Seismic earth pressures on retaining structures in cohesionless soils. Berkeley, CA: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California.
Mononobe, N., and M. Matsuo. 1929. “On determination of earth pressure during earthquake.” In Vol. 9 of Proc., World Engineering Congress, 177–185. Berlin: Springer.
Nakamura, S. 2006. “Re-examination of Mononobe-Okabe theory of gravity retaining walls using centrifuge model tests.” Soils Found. 46 (2): 135–146. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.135.
Okabe, S. 1926. “General theory of earth pressure.” J. Jpn. Soc. Civ. Eng. 12 (1).
Ortiz, L. A., R. F. Scott, and J. Lee. 1983. “Dynamic centrifuge testing of a cantilever retaining wall.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 11 (2): 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290110207.
Osouli, A., and S. Zamiran. 2017. “The effect of backfill cohesion on seismic response of cantilever retaining walls using fully dynamic analysis.” Comput. Geotech. 89 (Sep): 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.04.007.
Pain, A., V. S. R. Annapareddy, and S. Nimbalkar. 2018. “Seismic active thrust on rigid retaining wall using strain dependent dynamic properties.” Int. J. Geomech. 18 (12): 06018034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001331.
Pain, A., D. Choudhury, and S. K. Bhattacharyya. 2017. “Seismic rotational stability of gravity retaining walls by modified pseudo-dynamic method.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 94 (Mar): 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.016.
Pathmanathan, R., P. Franchin, C. Lai, and P. Pinto. 2007. “Numerical modelling of seismic response of cantilever earth-retaining structures.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Berlin: Springer.
Plaxis 2D. 2019a. PLAXIS material models CONNECT edition V20. Dublin, Ireland: Bentley Systems International.
Plaxis 2D. 2019b. PLAXIS reference manual CONNECT edition V20. Dublin, Ireland: Bentley Systems International.
Saito, Y., O. Matsuo, T. Tsutsumi, and S. Nakamura. 1999. “Dynamic centrifuge model tests on seismic stability of retaining wall, part 4.” In Proc., 54th Annual Conf. of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 310–311. Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
Salem, A. N., O. Y. Ezzeldine, and M. I. Amer. 2020. “Seismic loading on cantilever retaining walls: Full-scale dynamic analysis.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 130 (Mar): 105962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105962.
Santhoshkumar, G., P. Ghosh, and A. Murakami. 2019. “Seismic active resistance of a tilted cantilever retaining wall considering adaptive failure mechanism.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (8): 04019086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001470.
Santos, J. A., and A. G. Correia. 2001. “Reference threshold shear strain of soil.” In Proc., 15th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 267–270. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Sato, H., M. C. Fehler, and T. Maeda. 2012. Seismic wave propagation and scattering in the heterogeneous earth. Berlin: Springer.
SCDOT (South Carolina DOT). 2010. Geotechnical design manual. Columbia, SC: SCDOT.
Scotto di Santolo, A., and A. Evangelista. 2011. “Dynamic active earth pressure on cantilever retaining walls.” Comput. Geotech. 38 (8): 1041–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.07.015.
Shoji, Y., K. Tanii, and M. Kamiyama. 2005. “A study on the duration and amplitude characteristics of earthquake ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 25 (7–10): 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.033.
Singh, P., P. Bhartiya, T. Chakraborty, and D. Basu. 2023. “Numerical investigation and estimation of active earth thrust on gravity retaining walls under seismic excitation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 167 (Apr): 107798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107798.
Steedman, R. S., and X. Zeng. 1990. “The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Géotechnique 40 (1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.1.103.
Tanyu, B. F., P. J. Sabatini, and R. R. Berg. 2008. Earth retaining structures. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Teng, W. C. 1962. Foundation design. Englewood Cliff, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics. New York: Wiley.
Tiznado, J. C., and F. Rodriguez-Roa. 2011. “Seismic lateral movement prediction for gravity retaining walls on granular soils.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (3): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.09.008.
Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 65 (3): 581–626. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0650030581.
Veletsos, A. S., and A. H. Younan. 1994. “Dynamic modeling and response of soil-wall systems.” J. Geotech. Eng. 120 (12): 2155–2179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:12(2155).
Veletsos, A. S., and A. H. Younan. 1997. “Dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (2): 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:2(161).
Wei, M., Q. Luo, G.-S. Feng, T.-F. Wang, and L.-W. Jiang. 2022. “Shaking table tests on a cantilever retaining wall with reinforced and unreinforced backfill.” J. Zhejiang Univ.: Sci. A 23 (11): 900–916. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200192.
Xu, S.-Y., A. Shamsabadi, and E. Taciroglu. 2015. “Evaluation of active and passive seismic earth pressures considering internal friction and cohesion.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 70 (Mar): 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.004.
Zamiran, S., and A. Osouli. 2018. “Seismic motion response and fragility analyses of cantilever retaining walls with cohesive backfill.” Soils Found. 58 (2): 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.02.010.
Zhang, Y.-B., F.-Q. Chen, Y.-J. Lin, and H.-B. Chen. 2022. “Active earth pressure of narrow backfill against inverted T-type retaining walls rotating about the heel.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 26 (4): 1723–1739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-1294-8.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 12December 2024

History

Received: May 3, 2023
Accepted: Jun 24, 2024
Published online: Sep 25, 2024
Published in print: Dec 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 25, 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-8568. Email: [email protected]
Tanusree Chakraborty, A.M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share