Numerical Investigation of Stall Characteristics and Stall Control of Circulation Control Airfoil
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 37, Issue 6
Abstract
In recent years, circulation control (CC) technology has garnered significant attention in the field of active flow control. However, the issue of significant premature stall angle of attack in circulation control airfoils is highly prominent. This study numerically simulates the high angle of attack stall process of a circulation control wing using the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (U-RANS) turbulent model. A circulation control airfoil is attained by modifying the trailing edge of the NACA-64A-010 airfoil. This modification results in a substantial increase in the lift coefficient, although advancing the stall angle by 5°. A comparative evaluation of aerodynamic characteristics and flow physics differences between the circulation control airfoil and the nonjet airfoil is conducted under poststall conditions. Large-scale long-period fluctuations in aerodynamic forces result from the complex interaction between the trailing edge jet and the vortex system on the leeward side. Effective control of these large fluctuations during stall can be achieved by superimposing a sinusoidal pulsed jet on the steady jet. Activating a sinusoidal pulse jet when the lift coefficient reaches its maximum or minimum value, and matching the excitation frequency with the fundamental frequency of the aerodynamic force fluctuations, yields effective control.
Practical Applications
This paper unveils the influent of the CC, a kind of active flow control technology, on the airfoil stall characteristics. CC not only dramatically increases the lift coefficient of the airfoil but also leads to significant premature stall angle of attack. The CC airfoil stall is due to the complex interaction between the trailing edge jet and the vortex system on the leeward side. This results in large-scale, long-period fluctuations in aerodynamic forces. However, effective control of these large fluctuations during stall can be achieved by superimposing a sinusoidal pulsed jet on the steady jet under the guidance of this research. It ensures that lift is maintained even at high angles of attack, thus mitigating stall risk. This research promises substantial benefits for the aviation industry, enabling the development of planes that are more fuel-efficient and require shorter runways, while increasing safety. This advancement is expected to have a profound impact on commercial, cargo, and military aviation, leading to cost-effective operations and enhanced flight performance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Professor Laiping Zhang for generously providing the HyperFLOW code to complete the numerical simulation. This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2024JC-YBQN-0030) and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (No. 2021RC3077).
References
Alexander, M. G., S. G. Anders, S. K. Johnson, J. P. Florance, and D. F. Keller. 2005. Trailing edge blowing on a two-dimensional six-percent thick elliptical circulation contro airfoil up to transonic conditions, 1–26. Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
Englar, R. J., G. M. Blaylock, R. J. Gaeta, G. S. Jones, and W. E. Milholen. 2010. “Recent experimental development of circulation control airfoils and pneumatic powered-lift systems.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 2010–345. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Englar, R. J., R. A. Hemmerly, D. W. Taylor, W. H. Moore, V. Seredinsky, W. Valckenaere, and J. A. Jackson. 1981. “Design of the circulation control wing STOL demonstrator aircraft.” J. Aircr. 18 (1): 51–58. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.57463.
Englar, R. J., M. J. Smith, S. M. Kelley, and R. C. Rover. 1994. “Application of circulation control to advanced subsonic transport aircraft, Part I: Airfoil development.” J. Aircr. 31 (5): 1160–1168. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56907.
Forster, M. 2017. “Computational modelling of transonic circulation control.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Engineering, Univ. of Liverpool.
Friedman, C., R. Arieli, and Y. Levy. 2016. “Lift build-up on circulation control airfoils.” J. Aircr. 53 (1): 231–242. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033304.
He, X., Z. Zhao, R. Ma, N. Wang, and L. Zhang. 2016. “Validation of hyperflow in subsonic and transonic flow.” [In Chinese.] Acta Aerodynamica Sin. 34 (2): 267275. https://doi.org/10.7638/kqdlxxb-2016.0002.
Hoholis, G. 2016. “Assessment of fluidic control effectors using computational fluid dynamics.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Engineering, Univ. of Liverpool.
Hoholis, G., R. Steijl, and K. Badcock. 2016. “Circulation control as a roll effector for unmanned combat aerial vehicles.” J. Aircr. 53 (6): 1875–1889. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033642.
Itsariyapinyo, P., and R. N. Sharma. 2018. “Large eddy simulation of a NACA0015 circulation control airfoil using synthetic jets.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 82 (Mar): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.09.039.
Jameson, K. K., D. D. Marshall, R. Ehrmann, J. A. Lichtwardt, E. N. Paciano, R. J. Englar, and W. C. Horne. 2013. “Cal Poly’s AMELIA 10 foot span hybrid wing-body low noise CESTOL aircraft wing tunnel test and experimental results overview.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 2013–0974. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Jones, G. S., and R. J. Englar. 2003. “Advances in pneumatic controlled high lift systems through pulsed blowing.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 2003–3411. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Lei, Y., D. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and G. Su. 2022. “Effect of pulsed jet on aerodynamic performance of circulation control airfoil.” [In Chinese.] J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 48 (3): 485–494. https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0560.
Li, L., H. Xu, Z. Fu, and Z. Huang. 2022. “Numerical study of the yaw control of flapless aircraft.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 94 (10): 1593–1604. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-11-2021-0351.
Li, L., H. Xu, Y. Wang, and Y. Xu. 2023. “Research on the roll control of the flapless aircraft with circulation control.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 237 (5): 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100221119567.
Li, Y., and N. Qin. 2020. “Airfoil gust load alleviation by circulation control.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 98 (Dec): 105622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105622.
Liu, Y., L. N. Sankar, R. J. Englar, K. K. Ahuja, and R. Gaeta. 2004. “Computational evaluation of the steady and pulsed jet effects on the performance of a circulation control wing section.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 2004–56. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Naqvi, M. A. 2006. “Prediction of circulation control performance characteristics for super STOL & STOL applications.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Raju, R., R. Mittal, and Cattafesta. 2008. “Dynamics of airfoil separation control using zero-net mass-flux forcing.” AIAA J. 46 (12): 3103–3115. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37147.
Shah, N., C. Wong, and K. Kontis. 2008. “Active flow control using steady and pulsed blowing at subsonic speeds.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 2008–742. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Wang, N., X. Chang, R. Ma, and L. Zhang. 2019. “Verification and validation of hyperflow solver for subsonic and transonic turbulent flow simulations on unstructured/hybrid grids.” [In Chinese.] Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 51 (3): 813–825. https://doi.org/10.6052/0459-1879-18-331.
Wang, W., Y. Jiang, Y. Huang, and K. Yu. 2018. “Influence of pulse blowing on slotless flap airfoil aerodynamic characteristics.” [In Chinese.] Acta Aerodynamica Sin. 39 (11): 122118–122129. https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22118.
Warsop, C., and W. J. Crowther. 2018. “Fluidic flow control effectors for flight control.” AIAA J. 56 (10): 3808–3824. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056787.
Wood, N., and J. Nielsen. 1985. “Circulation control airfoils– Past, present, future.” In Proc., AIAA Paper 1985–0204. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 30, 2023
Accepted: May 23, 2024
Published online: Sep 3, 2024
Published in print: Nov 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Feb 3, 2025
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.