A Unified Analytical Model for Undrained Compressibility Behavior of Foam-Conditioned Coarse-Grained Soils Based on Effective Stress Analysis
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24, Issue 5
Abstract
During the tunneling process of earth pressure balance (EPB) shield machines, the undrained compressibility of foam-conditioned soils in the excavation chamber is essential for reducing the fluctuation of chamber pressure and guaranteeing effective tunnel face support. As conditioned soil is simplified to be radially constrained by the shield shell and in a quasi-one-dimensional compression state under the face pressure along the tunneling direction, a mechanism-inspired analytical model was developed to estimate the void ratio and pore pressure of foam-conditioned coarse-grained soils (FCS) in one-dimensional compression based on effective stress analysis. In the model, an expansion coefficient was proposed to characterize the filling state of foam bubbles in pores and a void ratio threshold (eth) was defined as the transition point of the FCS with and without effective stress. The variation of void ratio and pore pressure with total stress of FCS in two distinct stages of the void ratio (e), either greater or smaller than its threshold, were calculated based on Boyle’s law and the hyperbolic assumption of the effective stress–strain relation of soil. A good agreement between the analytical and experimental results verified the reliability of the proposed analytical method. Furthermore, a parametric study indicated that the compressibility increases with an increase in the expansion coefficient and foam injection ratio (FIR). Increasing additional water content leads to a decrease in compressibility under low pressure (σv ≤ 20 kPa), but an increase in compressibility under high pressure (σv > 20 kPa). Meanwhile, the pore pressure in FCS in the stage of e < eth also positively correlates with the expansion coefficient, FIR, and additional water content. The research findings would provide a convenient method to estimate the undrained compressibility behavior of FCS and theoretically guide the soil conditioning optimization in EPB tunneling.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52022112) and the Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduates of China (No. 2020zzts152) is acknowledged and appreciated.
References
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bezuijen, A. 2012. “Foam used during EPB tunnelling in saturated sand, parameters determining foam consumption.” In Proc., the 38th ITA World Tunnel Congress. Bangkok, Thailand: World Tunnel Congress (WTC).
Bezuijen, A., A. M. Talmon, J. F. W. Joustra, and B. Grote. 2006. “Pressure gradients and muck properties at the face of an EPB.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. of TC28 of the Int. Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, edited by K. J. Bakker, A. Bezuijen, W. Broere, A. Kwast, and E. A. Kwast, 195–201. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Taylor and Francis.
Budach, C. 2012. “Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein.” Ph.D. thesis, Fakultat für Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Budach, C., and M. Thewes. 2012. “New application ranges for EPB-shields in coarse-grained soils based on laboratory research.” In Proc., the 38th ITA World Tunnel Congress. Bangkok, Thailand: World Tunnel Congress (WTC).
Cao, W., P. Li, C. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. 2015. “Analysis models of initial compression and recompression curves of soils.” Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 34 (1): 166–173.
Ding, L., C. Xiao, and F. Cui. 2023, In press. “Analytical model for predicting time-dependent lateral deformation of geosynthetics-reinforced soil walls with modular block facing.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.04.021.
Guang-chang, Y., B. Bing, L. Yang, and C. Pei-pei. 2021. “Constitutive modeling for undrained shear behavior of gassy sand considering energy dissipation at the mesoscopic level.” Ocean Eng. 219: 108307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108307.
Guida, G., I. Einav, B. Marks, and F. Casini. 2020. “Linking micro grainsize polydispersity to macro porosity.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 187: 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.11.032.
Kuhn, M. R., and A. Daouadji. 2020. “Simulation of undrained quasi-saturated soil with pore pressure measurements using a discrete element (DEM) algorithm.” Soils Found. 60 (5): 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.05.013.
Lee, H., D.-Y. Kim, D. Shin, J. Oh, and H. Choi. 2022. “Effect of foam conditioning on performance of EPB shield tunnelling through laboratory excavation test.” Transp. Geotech. 32: 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100692.
Ling, F., S. Wang, Q. Hu, S. Huang, and Z. Feng. 2021. “Effect of bentonite slurry on the function of foam for changing the permeability characteristics of sand under high hydraulic gradients.” Can. Geotech. J. 59 (7): 1061–1070
Mori, L., M. Mooney, and M. Cha. 2018. “Characterizing the influence of stress on foam conditioned sand for EPB tunneling.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 71: 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.018.
Mun, W., and J. S. McCartney. 2017. “Constitutive model for the undrained compression of unsaturated clay.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (4): 04016117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001635.
MWR (Ministry of Water Resources). 2007. Standard for engineering classification of soil. GB/T50145. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Nakata, Y., Y. Kato, M. Hyodo, A. F. L. Hyde, and H. Murata. 2001. “One-dimensional compression behaviour of uniformly graded sand related to single particle crushing strength.” Soils Found. 41 (2): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.41.2_39.
Peng, Y., X. Ding, Y. Xiao, X. Deng, and W. Deng. 2020. “Detailed amount of particle breakage in nonuniformly graded sands under one-dimensional compression.” Can. Geotech. J. 57 (8): 1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0283.
Psmoas, S., and G. T. Houlsby. 2002. “Soil conditioning for EPBM tunnelling: Compressibility behaviour of foam/sand mixtures.” In Proc., 3th Int. Conf. of TC28 of the Int. Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 215–220. Oslo, Norway: Specifique.
Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri. 1996. Soil mechanics in engineering practice. New York: Wiley.
Wan, Z., S. Li, C. Yuan, S. Zhao, M. Wang, Q. Lu, and W. Hou. 2021. “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in silty clay and weathered mudstone.” Int. J. Geomech. 21 (9): 06021020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002119.
Wang, H., S. Wang, J. Zhong, T. Qu, Z. Liu, T. Xu, and P. Liu. 2021. “Undrained compressibility characteristics and pore pressure calculation model of foam-conditioned sand.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 118: 104161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.104161.
Wang, S., T. Qu, Y. Fang, J. Fu, and J. Yang. 2019. “Stress responses associated with earth pressure balance shield tunneling in dry granular ground using the discrete-element method.” Int. J. Geomech. 19 (7): 04019060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001434.
Wu, Y., A. Nazem, F. Meng, and M. A. Mooney. 2020. “Experimental study on the stability of foam-conditioned sand under pressure in the EPBM chamber.” Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 106: 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103590.
Xu, T., A. Bezuijen, and M. Thewes. 2022a. “Pressure infiltration characteristics of foam for EPB shield tunnelling in saturated sand—Part 1: ‘clean’ foam.” Géotechnique 72 (4): 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.187.
Xu, T., A. Bezuijen, and M. Thewes. 2022b. “Pressure infiltration characteristics of foam for EPB shield tunnelling in saturated sand—Part 2: Soil–foam mixture.” Géotechnique 72 (4): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.188.
Xu, Y., Y. Xu, and A. Wang. 2022c. “One-dimensional compression characteristics of uniformly graded sand under high stresses.” Granular Matter 24 (2): 1–12.
Yang, Y., X. Li, and X. Li. 2018. “Shear strength and compression coefficient for conditioned sand subjected to earth chamber stress levels.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018: 1–11.
Ye, X., S. Wang, J. Yang, D. Sheng, and C. Xiao. 2017. “Soil conditioning for EPB shield tunneling in argillaceous siltstone with high content of clay minerals: Case study.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (4): 05016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000791.
Zimmerman, H. D., M. H. Wagner, J. A. Carney, and Y. M. Ito. 1987. Effects of site geology on ground shock environments: Report 1, constitutive models for materials I2, I3, and W1–W10. Technical Rep. No. SL-87-19. Vicksburg, MS: USACE.
Zou, W.-l., Z. Han, L.-q. Ding, and X.-q. Wang. 2021. “Predicting resilient modulus of compacted subgrade soils under influences of freeze–thaw cycles and moisture using gene expression programming and artificial neural network approaches.” Transp. Geotech. 28: 100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100520.
Zumsteg, R., and L. Langmaack. 2017. “Mechanized tunneling in soft soils: Choice of excavation mode and application of soil-conditioning additives in glacial deposits.” Engineering 3 (6): 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.11.006.
Zumsteg, R., M. Plötze, and A. M. Puzrin. 2012. “Effect of soil conditioners on the pressure and rate-dependent shear strength of different clays.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (9): 1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000681.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 24 • Issue 5 • May 2024
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 17, 2023
Accepted: Nov 5, 2023
Published online: Feb 28, 2024
Published in print: May 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2024
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.