Technical Papers
Jan 5, 2021

Bayesian Bridge Weigh-in-Motion and Uncertainty Estimation

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 1

Abstract

Many researchers have developed bridge weigh-in-motion (BWIM) technology, mainly focusing on the representative value of the estimated axle weights. However, the estimation of the probabilistic distribution of axle weights is also important for understanding the ill conditioning of BWIM formulations and the uncertainty of estimation. Bayesian updating provides a coherent framework for assimilating data into models. Here, Bayesian bridge weigh-in-motion (BBWIM), which combines Bayesian updating and BWIM, is proposed. BBWIM can estimate not only the representative value of axle weights but also the uncertainty of the estimated value and the correlation among estimates. Uncertainties in estimated axle weight are quantitatively discussed with a simple two-axle problem. It is shown that the estimated weights of closely spaced axles have large uncertainty. BBWIM is applied to the measured data for an actual bridge. It is shown that additional information, in the form of a weak constraint on axle weight, namely, that closely spaced axles have similar weights, can reduce the uncertainty of estimated axle weights.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential and may only be provided with restrictions. If Tokyo City University and Kanto Road Maintenance Management Office agree with the provision of these research resources, these may be provided by the corresponding author. When publishing any research results based on the provided research resources, prior consent must be obtained from the corresponding author. In addition, these data can be used only for research.

Acknowledgments

The collection of field measurement data was supported by Kanto Road Maintenance Management Office and a grant from the Japan Institute of Country-ology and Engineering (JICE) (Grant 17013).

References

Bao, T., S. K. Babanajad, T. Taylor, and F. Ansari. 2016. “Generalized method and monitoring technique for shear-strain-based bridge weigh-in-motion.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (1): 4015029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000782.
Beck, J. L., and K.-V. Yuen. 2004. “Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (2): 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192).
Biezma, M. V., and F. Schanack. 2007. “Collapse of steel bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 21 (5): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:5(398).
Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. New York: Springer.
Cardini, A. J., and J. T. DeWolf. 2009. “Implementation of a long-term bridge weigh-in-motion system for a steel girder bridge in the interstate highway system.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (6): 418–423. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:6(418).
Chatterjee, P., E. OBrien, Y. Li, and A. González. 2006. “Wavelet domain analysis for identification of vehicle axles from bridge measurements.” Comput. Struct. 84 (28): 1792–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.04.013.
Christakos, G. 1992. Random field models in earth sciences. San Diego: Academic.
Cressie, N. 1991. Statistics for spatial data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Deng, L., and C. Cai. 2010. “Identification of dynamic vehicular axle loads: Demonstration by a field study.” J. Vib. Control 17 (2): 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546309351222.
Dowling, J., E. J. OBrien, and A. González. 2012. “Adaptation of cross entropy optimization to a dynamic bridge WIM calibration problem.” Eng. Struct. 44 (Nov): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.047.
González, A., J. Dowling, E. J. O’Brien, and A. Žnidarič. 2012. “Testing of a bridge weigh-in-motion algorithm utilising multiple longitudinal sensor locations.” J. Test. Eval. 40 (6): 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE104576.
He, W., T. Ling, E. J. OBrien, and L. Deng. 2019. “Virtual axle method for bridge weigh-in-motion systems requiring no axle detector.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (9): 04019086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001474.
Hoshiya, M., and I. Yoshida. 1996. “Identification of conditional stochastic Gaussian field.” J. Eng. Mech. 122 (2): 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:2(101).
Kalman, R. E. 1960. “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems.” Trans. ASME: J. Basic Eng. 82 (1): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552.
Lydon, M., S. E. Taylor, D. Robinson, A. Mufti, and E. J. O’Brien. 2016. “Recent developments in bridge weigh in motion (B-WIM).” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 6 (1): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-015-0119-6.
Moses, F. 1979. “Weigh-in-motion system using instrumented bridges.” Transp. Eng. J. 105 (3): 233–249.
O’Brien, E. J., D. Hajializadeh, N. Uddin, D. Robinson, and R. Opitz. 2012. “Strategies for axle detection in bridge weigh-in-motion systems.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Weigh-in-Motion, 79–88. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
O’Brien, E. J., C. W. Rowley, A. González, and M. F. Green. 2009. “A regularised solution to the bridge weigh-in-motion equations.” Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 16 (3): 310–327.
O’Brien, E. J., A. Žnidaric, and A. T. Dempsey. 1999. “Comparison of two independently developed bridge weigh-in-motion systems.” Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 6 (1): 147–161.
Ojio, T., C. H. Carey, E. J. OBrien, C. Doherty, and S. E. Taylor. 2016. “Contactless bridge weigh-in-motion.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (7): 04016032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000776.
Pais, J. C., S. I. R. Amorim, and M. J. C. Minhoto. 2013. “Impact of traffic overload on road pavement performance.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (9): 873–879. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000571.
Rasmussen, C. E., and C. K. I. Williams. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. London: MIT Press.
Richardson, J., S. Jones, A. Brown, E. O’Brien, and D. Hajializadeh. 2014. “On the use of bridge weigh-in-motion for overweight truck enforcement.” Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 21 (2): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHVS.2014.061632.
Ristic, B., S. Arulampalam, and N. Gordon. 2004. Beyond the Kalman filter: Particle filters for tracking applications. Norwood, MA: Artech House.
Rowley, C., E. J. OBrien, A. González, and A. Žnidarič. 2009. “Experimental testing of a moving force identification bridge weigh-in-motion algorithm.” Exp. Mech. 49 (5): 743–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-008-9188-3.
Sekiya, H. 2019. “Field verification over one year of a portable bridge weigh-in-motion system for steel bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (7): 04019063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001411.
Sekiya, H., K. Kubota, and C. Miki. 2018. “Simplified portable bridge weigh-in-motion system using accelerometers.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (1): 04017124. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001174.
Yu, Y., C. S. Cai, and L. Deng. 2015. “Vehicle axle identification using wavelet analysis of bridge global responses.” J. Vib. Control 23 (17): 2830–2840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546315623147.
Yu, Y., C. S. Cai, and L. Deng. 2016. “State-of-the-art review on bridge weigh-in-motion technology.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 19 (9): 1514–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216655922.
Yu, Y., C. S. Cai, and L. Deng. 2018. “Nothing-on-road bridge weigh-in-motion considering the transverse position of the vehicle.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14 (8): 1108–1122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1401095.
Zhao, H., N. Uddin, X. Shao, P. Zhu, and C. Tan. 2015. “Field-calibrated influence lines for improved axle weight identification with a bridge weigh-in-motion system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (6): 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.904383.
Zhong, J., H. Liu, and L. Yu. 2019. “Sparse regularization for traffic load monitoring using bridge response measurements.” Measurement 131 (Jan): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.044.
Zhu, X. Q., and S. S. Law. 2016. “Recent developments in inverse problems of vehicle-bridge interaction dynamics.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 6 (1): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0155-x.
Zolghadri, N., M. W. Halling, N. Johnson, and P. J. Barr. 2016. “Field verification of simplified bridge weigh-in-motion techniques.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (10): 04016063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000930.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 7Issue 1March 2021

History

Received: Jul 11, 2020
Accepted: Nov 4, 2020
Published online: Jan 5, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 5, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, Dept. of Urban and Civil Engineering, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9770-2233. Email: [email protected]
Hidehiko Sekiya [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Urban and Civil Engineering, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Advanced Research Laboratories, Tokyo City Univ., 1-28-1 Tamazutsumi, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8557, Japan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-3898. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share