Reliability Simulation Research for Nondestructive Ultrasonic Structure Testing Based on In Situ Influential Factors
Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 3
Abstract
The reliability simulation of ultrasonic nondestructive testing (NDT) based on the COMSOL Multiphysics simulation software is used to research the influence factors of the angle between the sound beam axis and the crack orientation, and the crack burial depth. First, the COMSOL Multiphysics simulation models of ultrasonic NDT are established to obtain the ultrasonic detection amplitude of cracks with the same size at different angles or crack burial depths. According to different crack lengths, the simulation of ultrasonic detection amplitude under different angles or crack burial depths are carried out, and the probability of detection (POD) curve forms, such as Weibull and Lockheed function, refereed so as to determine the optimal POD curve form considering the influence of angle or crack burial depth. Finally, the minimum detectable crack size with 90% detection probability considering the influence of angle or crack burial depth can be inversed, thus a simulation method of ultrasonic NDT reliability based on COMSOL Multiphysics is formed. The simulation results show that the POD curves and minimum detectable crack size at different angles or crack burial depths in a specific structure are effectively obtained through the proposed method. It can provide some suggestion for the formulation of an ultrasonic testing scheme affected by angle and crack burial depth in engineering practice.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.
Acknowledgments
This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875465). The authors would like to thank them.
References
Ali, A. H., D. Balint, A. Temple, and P. Leevers. 2012. “The reliability of defect sentencing in manual ultrasonic inspection.” NDT and E Int. 51 (Oct): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.04.003.
Carboni, M., S. Beretta, S. Cantini, and C. Gilardoni. 2013. “Probability of detection of ultrasonic in-service inspection of hollow axles.” In Proc., 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE. Berlin: German Society for Non-Destructive Testing.
Forsyth, D. S., A. Fahr, D. V. Leemans, and K. I. McRae. 2000. “Development of POD from in-service NDI data.” In Vol. 19B of Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation, 2167–2174. New York: Plenum Press.
Haapalainen, J., and E. Leskela. 2012. “Probability of detection simulations for ultra-sonic pulse-echo testing.” In Proc., 18th World Conf. on Nondestructive Testing. Durban, South Africa: South African Institute for Non-Destructive Testing.
Harding, C., G. Hugo, and S. Bowles. 2007. “Model-assisted probability of detection validation of automated ultrasonic scanning for crack detection at fastener holes.” In Proc., 10th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conf. on Aging Aircraft. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Huang, Q., P. Gardoni, and S. Hurlebaus. 2015. “Adaptive reliability analysis of reinforced concrete bridges subject to seismic loading using nondestructive testing.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 1 (4): 04015014. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000835.
Kurz, J. H., A. Jüngert, S. Dugan, G. Dobmann, and C. Boller. 2013. “Reliability considerations of NDT by probability of detection (POD) determination using ultrasound phased array.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 35 (Dec): 609–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.008.
Nath, S. K. 2014. “Effect of variation in signal amplitude and transit time on reliability analysis of ultrasonic time of flight diffraction characterization of vertical and inclined cracks.” Ultrasonics 54 (3): 938–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2013.11.007.
Raillon, R., F. Schubert, V. Dorval, C. Gilles-Pascaud, and J. Y. Chatellier. 2012. “Simulation supported POD methodology and validation for multi-zone ultrasonic testing procedure.” In Proc., 4th Int. Symp. on NDT in Aerospace. Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France: NDT in Aerospace.
Rentala, V. K., P. Mylavarapu, and J. P. Gautam. 2018. “Issues in estimating probability of detection of NDT techniques–A model assisted approach.” Ultrasonics 87 (Jul): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.012.
Schneider, C. R., and J. R. Rudlin. 2004. “Review of statistical methods used in quantifying NDT reliability.” Insight-Non-Destr. Test. Condition Monit. 46 (2): 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.46.2.77.55549.
Simola, K., and U. Pulkkinen. 1998. “Models for non-destructive inspection data.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 60 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00087-2.
Spiridonakos, M. D., E. N. Chatzi, and B. Sudret. 2016. “Polynomial chaos expansion models for the monitoring of structures under operational variability.” ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng. 2 (3): B4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000872.
Subair, S. M., K. Balasubramaniam, P. Rajagopal, A. Kumar, B. P. Rao, and T. Jayakumar. 2014. “Finite element simulations to predict probability of detection (PoD) curves for ultrasonic inspection of nuclear components.” Procedia Eng. 86 (1): 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.059.
Wang, X., G. M. Zhang, H. Ma, Y. Zhang, and D. Wang. 2018. “Measurement of a 3D ultrasonic wavefield using pulsed laser holographic microscopy for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation.” Sensors 18 (2): 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020573.
Yicheng, Z., L. Xiaohong, Z. Jun, and D. Hui. 2011. “Model based reliability analysis of PA ultrasonic testing for weld of hydro turbine runner.” Procedia Eng. 16 (1): 832–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.08.1162.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 25, 2019
Accepted: Mar 9, 2020
Published online: Jun 9, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 9, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.