Technical Papers
Dec 12, 2019

Structural Network Measures for Risk Assessment of Construction Projects

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1

Abstract

Risk assessment is an integral part of project management; however, its implementation is often challenging. One of the key challenges is how to collect reliable data for modeling risks. The objective of this paper is to introduce a network-based approach for risk assessment when data is limited or unreliable. The proposed structural network measures focus on relative connectivity of project tasks, resources, and risk events; or in other words, the data that are typically available from project planning and considered more reliable. The central concept is built upon the method called resource-based project risk management, which involves the identification and assessment of risks in terms of resource impacts and the subsequent effects on duration and/or cost of project tasks. The proposed methodology is illustrated using case study data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

Akintoye, A. S., and M. J. MacLeod. 1997. “Risk analysis and management in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X.
Alsamadani, R., M. Hallowell, and A. N. Javernick-Will. 2013. “Measuring and modelling safety communication in small work crews in the US using social network analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 31 (6): 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.685486.
Ayyub, B. M. 2001. Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Baloi, D., and A. D. Price. 2003. “Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (4): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0.
Barney, J. 1991. “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” J. Manage. 17: 99–120.
Chinowsky, P., J. Diekmann, and V. Galotti. 2008. “Social network model of construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (10): 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804).
Choi, H. H., and S. Mahadevan. 2008. “Construction project risk assessment using existing database and project-specific information.” J. Eng. Manage. 134 (11): 894–903.
Damnjanovic, I., and K. Reinschmidt. 2019. “Data analytics for engineering and construction project risk management.” In Risk, systems and decisions. New York: Springer.
Dickinson, M. W., A. C. Thornton, and S. Graves. 2001. “Technology portfolio management: Optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 48 (4): 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.969428.
Fang, C., F. Marle, E. Zio, and J. C. Bocquet. 2012. “Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 106 (Oct): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.005.
Govan, P. 2014. Causal network methods for integrated project portfolio risk analysis. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ.
Govan, P., and I. Damnjanovic. 2016. “The resource-based view on project risk management.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (9): 04016034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001136.
Ibe, O. C. 2011. Fundamentals of stochastic networks. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Marle, F., L.-A. Vidal, and J.-C. Bocquet. 2013. “Interactions-based risk clustering methodologies and algorithms for complex project management.” Int. J. Prod. Econ. 142 (2): 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.022.
Pryke, S. 2012. Social network analysis in construction. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Sosa, M. E. 2003. “Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions.” Trans. ASME 125 (2): 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1564074.
Sosa, M. E., S. D. Eppinger, and C. M. Rowles. 2007. “A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products.” J. Mech. Des. 129 (11): 1118–1129. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2771182.
Steward, D. 1981. “The design structure matrix: A method for managing the design of complex systems.” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. EM-28 (3): 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1981.6448589.
Walker, F., and S. D. Pryke. 2009. “Role, dimensions, and degrees of incompleteness in construction contract documentation.” In Proc., RICS Annual Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conf. (COBRA), 1258–1275. Cape Town, South Africa: Univ. of Cape Town.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Manage. J. 5 (2): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 6Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Mar 21, 2019
Accepted: Jul 11, 2019
Published online: Dec 12, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 12, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lead Reliability Engineer, GE Renewable Energy, 300 Garlington Rd., Greenville, SC 29615. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1821-8492. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Zachry Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-5502. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share