Fuzzy Analytical Solution for Activity Duration Estimation under Uncertainty
Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
The dynamic nature of construction projects triggers uncertainty in activity durations. Several approaches such as interval analysis, probabilistic models, and fuzzy set theory have been proposed in the literature to address this uncertainty and provide more realistic duration estimates. However, difficulties in defining the boundaries of duration intervals in the presence of uncertainty and unavailability of historical data make the fuzzy set theory an effective alternative. Despite the potency of fuzzy set theory in providing a systematic tool to address the uncertainty caused by incomplete or ill-defined data, its application in activity duration estimation is very limited. This limitation mainly stems from the complexity of fuzzy calculations and lack of a precise analytical solution for the fuzzy weighted average. To address this gap, this paper presents a fuzzy analytical solution with a concise structure and efficient computation process to estimate the activity durations under uncertainty. The developed model generates a set of risk-related duration modifiers by considering the dependency and combinatory effect of different risk factors. Experts’ confidence level has been modeled using interval-valued fuzzy numbers and an analytical solution based on the Karnik-Mendel (KM) algorithm has been employed to calculate the fuzzy weighted average. The advantages of this approach compared to existing models are (1) considering the dependency and combinatory effect of risk factors on activity durations, (2) accounting for uncertainty in experts’ evaluations by employing the interval-valued fuzzy numbers, and (3) avoiding the creation of incorrect membership functions by using an analytical solution rather than a discrete algorithm to calculate the fuzzy weighted average. To elaborate the model, a simulated bridge project and four risk factors affecting activity durations have been presented. Applying the proposed methodology, a set of duration modifiers to calculate the optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic duration values for each activity under uncertainty are calculated. Compared to similar approaches, the resultant modified durations are more reliable since the combinatory effect of risk factors and the uncertainty of decision makers are taken into consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Baloi, D., and A. D. F. Price. 2003. “Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (4): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-863(02)00017-0.
Bojadziev, G., and M. Bojadziev. 2007. Fuzzy logic for business, finance, and management. Singapore: World Scientific.
Bonnal, P., D. Gourc, and G. Lacoste. 2004. “Where do we stand with fuzzy project scheduling?” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(114).
Chan, A. P. C., D. Scott, and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Factors affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
Chanas, S., D. Dubois, and P. Zielinski. 2002. “On the sure criticality of tasks in activity networks with imprecise durations.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B Cybern. 32 (4): 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2002.1018760.
Chanas, S., and J. Kamburowski. 1981. “The use of fuzzy variables in PERT.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 5 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(81)90030-0.
Chanas, S., and P. Zieliński. 2001. “Critical path analysis in the network with fuzzy activity times.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 122 (2): 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(00)00076-2.
Chang, P.-T., K.-C. Hung, K.-P. Lin, and C.-H. Chang. 2006. “A comparison of discrete algorithms for fuzzy weighted average.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14 (5): 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.878253.
Chen, C.-T., and S.-F. Huang. 2007. “Applying fuzzy method for measuring criticality in project network.” Inf. Sci. 177 (12): 2448–2458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.035.
Chen, S.-J., and S.-M. Chen. 2003. “Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 11 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2002.806316.
Chen, S.-J., and S.-M. Chen. 2008. “Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers.” Comput. Math. Appl. 55 (8): 1670–1685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2007.06.022.
Chen, S.-M., and J.-H. Chen. 2009. “Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures between interval-valued fuzzy numbers and interval-valued fuzzy number arithmetic operators.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (3): 6309–6317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.017.
Chen, S.-M., and K. Sanguansat. 2011. “Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (3): 2163–2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.002.
Chen, S.-M., and C.-H. Wang. 2009. “Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking fuzzy numbers using α-cuts, belief features and signal/noise ratios.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (3): 5576–5581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.112.
Chen, S.-P. 2007. “Analysis of critical paths in a project network with fuzzy activity times.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183 (1): 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.053.
Chen, S.-P., and Y.-J. Hsueh. 2008. “A simple approach to fuzzy critical path analysis in project networks.” Appl. Math. Modell. 32 (7): 1289–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.04.009.
Chrysafis, K. A., and B. K. Papadopoulos. 2014. “Possibilistic moments for the task duration in fuzzy PERT.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 04014071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000296.
Civanlar, M. R., and H. J. Trussell. 1986. “Constructing membership functions using statistical data.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 18 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(86)90024-2.
Dong, W. M., and F. S. Wong. 1987. “Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 21 (2): 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90163-1.
Gładysz, B. 2017. “Fuzzy-probabilistic PERT.” Ann. Oper. Res. 258 (2): 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2315-0.
Golizadeh, H., A. N. Sadeghifam, H. Aadal, and M. Z. A. Majid. 2016. “Automated tool for predicting duration of construction activities in tropical countries.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 20 (1): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0263-x.
Guh, Y.-Y., C.-C. Hon, K.-M. Wang, and E. S. Lee. 1996. “Fuzzy weighted average: A max-min paired elimination method.” Comput. Math. Appl. 32 (8): 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(96)00171-X.
Guu, S.-M. 2002. “Fuzzy weighted averages revisited.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 126 (3): 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00078-1.
Halpin, D. W. 2010. Construction management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hong, D. H., and S. Lee. 2002. “Some algebraic properties and a distance measure for interval-valued fuzzy numbers.” Inf. Sci. 148 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00265-7.
Kao, C., and S.-T. Liu. 2001. “Fractional programming approach to fuzzy weighted average.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 120 (3): 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00137-2.
Karnik, N. N., and J. M. Mendel. 2001. “Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set.” Inf. Sci. 132 (1–4): 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(01)00069-X.
Kaufmann, A., and M. M. Gupta. 1988. Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Kaur, P., and A. Kumar. 2014. “Linear programming approach for solving fuzzy critical path problems with fuzzy parameters.” Appl. Soft Comput. 21 (Aug): 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.017.
Lee, D. H., and D. Park. 1997. “An efficient algorithm for fuzzy weighted average.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 87 (1): 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00027-9.
Lee, L.-W., and S.-M. Chen. 2008. “Fuzzy risk analysis based on fuzzy numbers with different shapes and different deviations.” Expert Syst. Appl. 34 (4): 2763–2771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.009.
Li, J., O. Moselhi, and S. Alkass. 2006. “Forecasting project status by using fuzzy logic.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 132 (11): 1193–1202. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:11(1193).
Liou, T.-S., and M.-J. J. Wang. 1992. “Fuzzy weighted average: An improved algorithm.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49 (3): 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(92)90282-9.
Liu, F., and J. M. Mendel. 2008. “Aggregation using the fuzzy weighted average as computed by the Karnik–Mendel algorithms.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.896229.
Liu, X., J. M. Mendel, and D. Wu. 2012. “Analytical solution methods for the fuzzy weighted average.” Inf. Sci. 187 (Mar): 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.10.006.
Lorterapong, P., and O. Moselhi. 1996. “Project-network analysis using fuzzy sets theory.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 122 (4): 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:4(308).
Maravas, A., and J.-P. Pantouvakis. 2012. “Project cash flow analysis in the presence of uncertainty in activity duration and cost.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (3): 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.005.
Medaglia, A. L., S.-C. Fang, H. L. W. Nuttle, and J. R. Wilson. 2002. “An efficient and flexible mechanism for constructing membership functions.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139 (1): 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00157-6.
Ock, J.-H., and S.-H. Han. 2010. “Measuring risk-associated activity’s duration: A fuzzy set theory application.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 14 (5): 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-010-1003-x.
Oliveros, A. V. O., and A. R. Fayek. 2005. “Fuzzy logic approach for activity delay analysis and schedule updating.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:1(42).
Pawan, P., and P. Lorterapong. 2015. “A fuzzy-based integrated framework for assessing time contingency in construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (3): 04015083. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001073.
Rezakhani, P. 2012a. “A review of fuzzy risk assessment models for construction projects.” Slovak J. Civ. Eng. 20 (3): 35–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10189-012-0016-5.
Rezakhani, P. 2012b. “Classifying key risk factors in construction projects.” Buletinul Institutului Politehnic din lasi. Sectia Constructii, Arhitectura 58 (2): 27.
Rezakhani, P. 2017. Hybrid fuzzy-Bayesian dynamic decision support tool for resource-based scheduling of construction projects. Kansas City, MO: Univ. of Missouri.
Rezakhani, P., W.-S. Jang, S. Lee, and D.-E. Lee. 2014. “Project risk assessment model combining the fuzzy weighted average principle with a similarity measure.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18 (2): 521–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0053-x.
Salah, A., and O. Moselhi. 2015. “Contingency modelling for construction projects using fuzzy-set theory.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 22 (2): 214–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2014-0039.
Taroun, A. 2014. “Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (1): 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004.
Van Den Broek, P., and J. Noppen. 2009. “Fuzzy weighted average-analytical solution.” In Proc., Int. Joint Conf. on Computational Intelligence, 31–38. Setubal, Portugal: Institute for Systems and Technologies of Information, Control and Communication.
Yakhchali, S. H. 2012. “A path enumeration approach for the analysis of critical activities in fuzzy networks.” Inf. Sci. 204 (Oct): 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.01.025.
Yang, H. Q., H. Yao, and J. D. Jones. 1993. “Calculating functions of fuzzy numbers.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 55 (3): 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90253-E.
Zareei, A., F. Zaerpour, M. Bagherpour, A. A. Noora, and A. H. Vencheh. 2011. “A new approach for solving fuzzy critical path problem using analysis of events.” Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (1): 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.018.
Zhang, H., H. Li, and C. M. Tam. 2004. “Fuzzy discrete-event simulation for modeling uncertain activity duration.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 11 (6): 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980410570184.
Zhang, H., C. M. Tam, and H. Li. 2005. “Modeling uncertain activity duration by fuzzy number and discrete-event simulation.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164 (3): 715–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.035.
Zimmermann, H.-J. 2012. Vol. 10 of Fuzzy sets, decision making, and expert systems. New York: Springer.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • December 2019
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 31, 2018
Accepted: Mar 4, 2019
Published online: Oct 11, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 11, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.