Technical Papers
Sep 21, 2019

Time-Dependent Probability of Exceeding a Target Level of Recovery

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 4

Abstract

The resilience of a system is generally defined in terms of its ability to withstand external perturbations, adapt, and rapidly recover. This paper introduces a probabilistic formulation to predict the recovery process of a system given past recovery data and to estimate the probability of reaching or exceeding a target value of functionality at any time. A Bayesian inference is used to capture the changes over time of model parameters as recovery data become available during the work progress. The proposed formulation is general and can be applied to continuous recovery processes such as those of economic or natural systems, as well as to discrete recovery processes typical of engineering systems. As an illustration of the proposed formulation, two examples are provided. The paper models the recovery of a reinforced concrete bridge following seismic damage, as well as the population relocation after the occurrence of a seismic event when no data on the duration of the recovery are available a priori.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Award No. 1638346 and by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) through the Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning under Award No. 70NANB15H044. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the European Research Council under the Grant Agreement No. ERC_IDEAL RESCUE_637842 of the project IDEAL RESCUE-Integrated Design and Control of Sustainable Communities during Emergencies. Opinions and findings presented are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

References

Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 2006. Probability concepts in engineering. Emphasis on applications in civil and environmental engineering. New York: Wiley.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2000. Database on the performance of structures near strong-motion recordings: 1994 Northridge earthquake. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
Ayyub, B. M. 2014. “Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making.” Risk Anal. 34 (2): 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12093.
Ayyub, B. M. 2015. “Practical resilience metrics for planning, design, and decision making.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 1 (3): 04015008. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000826.
Bai, J.-W., M. B. D. Hueste, and P. Gardoni. 2009. “Probabilistic assessment of structural damage due earthquakes for buildings in Mid-America.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (10): 1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1155).
Bocchini, P., A. Decò, and D. M. Frangopol. 2012. “Probabilistic functionality recovery model for resilience analysis.” In Bridge maintenance, safety, management, resilience and sustainability, edited by F. Biondini, 1920–1927. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
Bonstrom, H., and R. B. Corotis. 2016. “First-order reliability approach to quantify and improve building portfolio resilience.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (8): C4014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001213.
Boore, D. M., and G. M. Atkinson. 2008. “Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s.” Earthquake Spectra 24 (1): 99–138. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2830434.
Box, G. E., and D. R. Cox. 1964. “An analysis of transformations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Methodol. 26 (2): 211–243.
Box, G. E. P., and G. C. Tiao. 1992. Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.
Bruneau, M., S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, T. D. O’Rourke, A. M. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. von Winterfeldt. 2003. “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 19 (4): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497.
Bruneau, M., and A. Reinhorn. 2007. “Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (1): 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2431396.
Caverzan, A., and G. Solomos. 2014. “Review on resilience in literature and standards for critical built-infrastructures.” In JRC Science and Policy Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Chang, S. E., and M. Shinozuka. 2004. “Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities.” Earthquake Spectra 20 (3): 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775796.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010a. “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct. 32 (11): 3639–3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008.
Cimellaro, G. P., A. M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau. 2010b. “Seismic resilience of a hospital system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (1): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663847.
Cole, E. S. L., S. A. Bhagwat, and K. J. Willis. 2014. “Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance.” Nat. Commun. 5 (1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4906.
Corotis, R. 2009. “Societal issues in adopting life-cycle concepts within the political system.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 5 (1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470701322867.
Decò, A., P. Bocchini, and D. M. Frangopol. 2013. “A probabilistic approach for the prediction of seismic resilience of bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42 (10): 1469–1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2282.
Ditlevsen, O., and H. O. Madsen. 1996. Structural reliability methods. New York: Wiley.
Doorn, N., P. Gardoni, and C. Murphy. 2018. “A multidisciplinary definition and evaluation of resilience: The role of social justice in defining resilience.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1428162.
Ellingwood, B. R., H. Cutler, P. Gardoni, W. G. Peacock, J. W. van de Lindt, and N. Wang. 2016. “The Centerville virtual community: A fully integrated decision model of interacting physical and social infrastructure systems.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1255000.
FEMA. 2015. “Hazus 2.1 technical and user’s manuals.” Accessed February 21, 2018. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/24609.
Garbin, D. 2007. “Moving beyond critical infrastructures protection to disaster resilience.” In CIP program discussion paper series. Arlington, VA: George Mason Univ. School of Law.
Gardoni, P., ed. 2017. Risk and reliability analysis: Theory and applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Gardoni, P., eds. 2018. Handbook of sustainable and resilient infrastructure. New York: Routledge.
Gardoni, P., A. Der Kiureghian, and K. M. Mosalam. 2002. “Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations.” J. Eng. Mech. 128 (10): 1024–1038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024).
Gardoni, P., and J. M. LaFave, eds. 2016. Multi-hazard approaches to civil infrastructure engineering. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Gardoni, P., K. M. Mosalam, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2003. “Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (1): 79–106.
Gardoni, P., C. Murphy, and A. Rowell, eds. 2016. Societal risk management of natural hazards. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Gardoni, P., K. F. Reinschmidt, and R. Kumar. 2007. “A probabilistic framework for Bayesian adaptive forecasting of project progress.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 22 (3): 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2007.00478.x.
Guidotti, R., H. Chmielewski, V. Unnikrishnan, P. Gardoni, T. McAllister, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2016. “Modeling the resilience of critical infrastructure: The role of network dependencies.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1 (3–4): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999.
Guidotti, R., P. Gardoni, and Y. Chen. 2017. “Network reliability analysis with link and nodal weights and auxiliary nodes.” Struct. Saf. 65 (Mar): 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.12.001.
Hogg, R. V., J. W. McKean, and A. T. Craig. 2012. Introduction to mathematical statistics. 7th ed. Boston: Prentice Hall.
Jia, G., and P. Gardoni. 2018. “State-dependent stochastic models: A general stochastic framework for modeling deteriorating engineering systems considering multiple deterioration processes and their interactions.” Struct. Saf. 72 (May): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.001.
Jia, G., and P. Gardoni. 2019. “Stochastic life-cycle analysis: Renewal-theory life-cycle analysis with state-dependent deterioration stochastic models.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng.15 (8): 1001–1014.
Jia, G., A. Tabandeh, and P. Gardoni. 2017. “Life-cycle analysis of engineering systems: Modeling deterioration, instantaneous reliability, and resilience.” In Risk and reliability analysis: Theory and applications, edited by P. Gardoni, 465–494. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Klinger, M., and M., Susong, eds. 2006. The construction project: Phases, people, terms, paperwork, processes. Chicago: ABA Book Publishing.
Koliou, M., J. W. de Lindt, T. McAllister, B. R. Ellingwood, M. Dillard, and H. Cutler. 2018. “State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547.
Kumar, R., D. Cline, and P. Gardoni. 2015. “A stochastic framework to model deterioration in engineering systems.” Struct. Saf. 53 (Mar): 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.12.001.
Kumar, R., and P. Gardoni. 2014. “Renewal theory-based life-cycle analysis of deteriorating engineering systems.” Struct. Saf. 50: 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.012.
Lin, Y. S. 2009. “Development of algorithms to estimate post-disaster population dislocation—A research-based approach.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Urban and Regional Sciences, Texas A&M Univ.
Liu, P. L., and A. Der Kiureghian. 1986. “Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances.” Probab. Eng. Mech. 1 (2): 105–112.
McAllister, T. 2013. Developing guidelines and standards for disaster resilience of the built environment: A research needs assessment. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Murphy, C., and P. Gardoni. 2006. “The role of society in engineering risk analysis: A capabilities-based approach.” Risk Anal. 26 (4): 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00801.x.
Murphy, C., P. Gardoni, and C. E. Harris. 2011. “Classification and moral evaluation of uncertainties in engineering modeling.” Sci. Eng. Ethics 17 (3): 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9242-2.
Sharma, N., A. Tabandeh, and P. Gardoni. 2018. “Resilience analysis: A mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 3 (2): 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1345257.
Steelman, J., J. Song, and J. F. Hajjar. 2007. “Integrated data flow and risk aggregation for consequence-based risk management of seismic regional losses.” Accessed October 15, 2018. http://mae.cee.illinois.edu/publications/reports/Report_Jan_07.pdf.
Tierney, K., and M. Bruneau. 2007. “Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction.” TR News 250: 14–17.
Titi, A., F. Biondini, and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Seismic resilience of deteriorating concrete structures.” In Proc., Structures Congress 2015, 1649–1660. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Van Leeuwen, W. J. D. 2008. “Monitoring the effects of forest restoration treatments on post-fire vegetation recovery with MODIS multitemporal data.” Sensors 8 (3): 2017–2042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8032017.
White House. 2013. Critical infrastructure security and resilience. PPD-21. Washington, DC: White House.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 5Issue 4December 2019

History

Received: Apr 5, 2018
Accepted: Feb 26, 2019
Published online: Sep 21, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 21, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MAE Center: Creating a Multi-Hazard Approach to Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-7662. Email: [email protected]
Paolo Gardoni [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MAE Center: Creating a Multi-Hazard Approach to Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Email: [email protected]
Gian Paolo Cimellaro [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, Turin 10129, Italy. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share