Technical Papers
Mar 14, 2018

Bayesian Stochastic Soil Modeling Framework Using Gaussian Markov Random Fields

Publication: ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Stochastic soil modeling aims to provide reasonable mean, variance, and spatial correlation of soil properties with quantified uncertainty. Because of difficulties in integrating limited and imperfect prior knowledge (i.e., epistemic uncertainty) with observed site-specific information from tests (i.e., aleatoric uncertainty), a reasonably accurate estimate of the spatial correlation is significantly challenging. Possible reasons include (1) only sparse data being available (i.e., one-dimensional observations are collected at selected locations); and (2) from a physical point of view, the formation process of soil layers is considerably complex. This paper develops a Gaussian Markov random field (GMRF)-based modeling framework to describe the spatial correlation of soil properties conditional on observed electric cone penetration test (CPT) soundings at multiple locations. The model parameters are estimated using a novel stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach and a fast Bayesian algorithm using the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA). An existing software library is used to implement the SPDE approach and Bayesian estimation. A real-world example using 185 CPT soundings from Alameda County, California is provided to demonstrate the developed method and examine its performance. The analyzed results from the proposed model framework are compared with the widely accepted covariance-based kriging method. The results indicate that the new approach generally outperforms the kriging method in predicting the long-range variability. In addition, a better understanding of the fine-scale variability along the depth is achieved by investigating one-dimensional residual processes at multiple locations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Hui Wang and Florian Wellmann would like to acknowledge the support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science (AICES), RWTH Aachen University. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that have helped to improve the paper significantly.

References

Alonso, E. E., and Krizek, R. J. (1976). “Stochastic formulation of soil properties.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd- und Grundbau, Essen, Germany.
Baecher, G. (1987). “Statistical analysis of geotechnical data.”, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
Chen, Q., Wang, C., and Hsein Juang, C. (2015). “CPT-based evaluation of liquefaction potential accounting for soil spatial variability at multiple scales.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 04015077.
Cressie, N. (2015). Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
DeGroot, D. J., and Baecher, G. B. (1993). “Estimating autocovariance of in-situ soil properties.” J. Geotech. Eng., 147–166.
Fenton, G. A. (1999a). “Estimation for stochastic soil models.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 470–485.
Fenton, G. A. (1999b). “Random field modeling of CPT data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 486–498.
Guan, Y., Sherman, M., and Calvin, J. A. (2004). “A nonparametric test for spatial isotropy using subsampling.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 99(467), 810–821.
Holzer, T. L., Bennett, M. J., Noce, T. E., Padovani, A. C., and Tinsley, J. C., III. (2006). “Liquefaction hazard mapping with LPI in the greater Oakland, California, area.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(3), 693–708.
Horváth, L., Kokoszka, P., and Rice, G. (2014). “Testing stationarity of functional time series.” J. Econometrics, 179(1), 66–82.
INLA Library. (2018). “R-INLA package.” Finn Lindgren, Univ. of Bath, Bath, U.K.
Jaksa, M. B., Brooker, P. I., and Kaggwa, W. S. (1997). “Inaccuracies associated with estimating random measurement errors.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 393–401.
Jun, M., and Genton, M. G. (2012). “A test for stationarity of spatio-temporal random fields on planar and spherical domains.” Stat. Sin., 22, 1737–1764.
Lindgren, F., Rue, H., and Lindström, J. (2011). “An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: The stochastic partial differential equation approach.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 73(4), 423–498.
Lindgren, F. K., and Rue, H. (2015). “Bayesian spatial modelling with R-INLA.” J. Stat. Software, 63(19), 1–25.
Liu, C.-N., and Chen, C.-H. (2006). “Mapping liquefaction potential considering spatial correlations of CPT measurements.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1178–1187.
Myers, D. E. (1989). “To be or not to be… stationary? That is the question.” Math. Geol., 21(3), 347–362.
Phoon, K.-K., Quek, S.-T., and An, P. (2003). “Identification of statistically homogeneous soil layers using modified Bartlett statistics.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 649–659.
Pyrcz, M. J., and Deutsch, C. V. (2014). Geostatistical reservoir modeling, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
R Core Team (2017). “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Robertson, P., and Wride, C. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Can. Geotech. J., 35(3), 442–459.
Rue, H., Martino, S., and Chopin, N. (2009). “Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol., 71(2), 319–392.
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). (2018). “Cone penetration testing (CPT).” ⟨https://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/cpt/index.php⟩ (Oct. 20, 2016).
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). “Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 103(11), 1227–1246.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
Volume 4Issue 2June 2018

History

Received: Jan 5, 2017
Accepted: Nov 2, 2017
Published online: Mar 14, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 14, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Associate, Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science, RWTH Aachen Univ., 52062 Aachen, Germany (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7970-6772. E-mail: [email protected]
Xiangrong Wang [email protected]
Postdoctoral Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Akron, Akron, OH 44325. E-mail: [email protected]
J. Florian Wellmann [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science, RWTH Aachen Univ., 52062 Aachen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Robert Y. Liang, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Univ. of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share