Chapter
Jun 7, 2018
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V

Probability of Liquefaction at the Sampit and Gapway Sites in South Carolina

Publication: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Liquefaction Triggering, Consequences, and Mitigation (GSP 290)

ABSTRACT

Soil liquefaction was one of the major causes of damage in the 1886 Charleston earthquake, one of the largest historic seismic events in the eastern United States. Paleoliquefaction studies indicate that at least seven, large, prehistoric earthquakes have occurred within the last 6000 years in the South Carolina Coastal Plain (SCCP). The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has marked the SCCP as a region with high seismic hazard. In this study, data from cone penetration tests obtained from six test locations at two sites with a history of paleoliquefaction, Sampit and Gapway, were used for site-specific evaluation of liquefaction potential. Liquefaction evaluation methods, that include both deterministic and probabilistic approaches, were used to evaluate the current liquefaction susceptibility based on the most recent estimation of prehistoric earthquake magnitude and peak ground accelerations. Results indicate that, at these two sites, the factor of safety against liquefaction ranges from 0.4 to 0.7 and liquefaction probability is greater than 83%. Moreover, results obtained from probabilistic approaches were compared with deterministic approaches and it was found that except for one test location, the equivalent minimum probability of liquefaction for the soil deposits was about 16%.

Get full access to this chapter

View all available purchase options and get full access to this chapter.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The SPT and CPT data used in this study were obtained with funds from the National Science Foundation, under grant number CMS-0556006. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

REFERENCES

Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2014). “CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures.” Center for Geotechnical Modelling, Report No. UCD/CGM-14/01 University of California, Davis, CA.
Cetin, K. O., Der Kiureghian, A., and Seed, R. B. (2002). "Probabilistic models for the initiation of seismic soil liquefaction." Structural Safety, 24, 67–82.
Cetin, K. O., Seed, R. B., Der Kiureghian, A., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., Kayen, R. E., and Moss, R. E. S. (2004). “Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Eng., ASCE 130(12), 1314–340.
Christian, J. T., and Swiger, W. F. (1975). "Statistics of liquefaction and SPT results." J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Eng., ASCE 101. 1135–1150.
Cox, B. R., Boulanger, R. W., Tokimatsu, K., Wood, C., Abe, A., Ashford, S., Donahue, J., Ishihara, K., Kayen, R., Katsumata, K., Kishida, T., Kokusho, T., Mason, B., Moss, R., Stewart, J., Tohyama, K., and Zekkos, D. (2013). "Liquefaction at strong motion stations and in Urayasu City during the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake." Earthquake Spectra, EERI, 29(S1), S55-S80.
Gheibi, E., and Bagheripour, M. H. (2011). "Effect of parameters on equivalent number of cycles using nonlinear site response analysis.” Advanced Materials Research, 255, pp. 2365–2369.
Gheibi, E., and Gassman, S. L. (2016). “Application of GMPEs to estimate the minimum magnitude and peak ground acceleration of prehistoric earthquakes at Hollywood, SC.” Eng Geol. 214, 60–66.
Gheibi, E., and Gassman, S. L. (2014). “Reassessment of prehistoric earthquake accelerations at Sampit and Gapway sites in the South Carolina Coastal Plain.” Proc., 10th US National Conference on Earthquake Eng. (10NCEE), AK.
Gheibi, E., and Gassman, S. L. (2015). “Magnitudes of prehistoric earthquakes at the Hollywood, South Carolina, site.” Proc., IFCEE 2015, pp 1246–1256.
Gheibi, E., Gassman, S. L., Hasek, M., and Talwani. P. (2017). “Assessment of paleoliquefaction shaking that caused a sand blow at Fort Dorchester, SC.” Bulleting of Earthquake Eng., pp 1–9.
Gheibi, E., Gassman, S. L., and Talwani. P. (2017). “Regional assessment of prehistoric earthquake magnitudes in the South Carolina Coastal Plain.” Natural Hazards, Submitted
Green, R. A., Cubrinovski, M., Cox, B., Wood, C., Wotherspoon, L., Bradley, B., and Maurer, B. (2014). "Select liquefaction case histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence." Earthquake Spectra, EERI, 30(1), 131–153.
Hu, K., Gassman, S. L., and Talwani, P. (2002a). “In-situ properties of soils at paleoliquefaction sites in the South Carolina Coastal Plain.” Seismological Res. Letters, 73 (6), 964–978.
Hu, K., Gassman, S. L., and Talwani, P. (2002b). “Magnitudes of prehistoric earthquakes in the South Carolina Coastal Plain from geotechnical data.” Seismological Res. Letters, 73 (6), 979–991.
Idriss, I. M., and Boulanger, R. W. (2008). “Soil liquefaction during earthquakes.” Monograph MNO-12, EERI., Oakland, CA.
Leon, E., Gassman, S. L., and Talwani, P. (2006). “Accounting for soil age when assessing liquefaction potential.” J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Eng. ASCE. 132(3), 363–377.
Leon, E., Gassman, S. L., and Talwani, P. (2005). “Accounting for soil aging on assessing magnitudes and accelerations of prehistoric earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra, 21 (3): 737–759.
Moss, R. E. S., Seed, R. B., Kayen, R. E., Stewart, J. P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Cetin, K. O. (2006). “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Eng., ASCE 132(8), 1032–051.
Obermeier, S. F., Weems, R. E., and Jacobson, R. B. (1987). “Earthquake-induced liquefaction features in the coastal South Carolina region.” US Geological Survey, Open File Report, 87, 504.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test.” Canadian Geotechnical J., 35 (3), 442–459.
Talwani, P., and Cox, J. (1985). “Paleoseismic evidence for recurrence of earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina.” Science., 229 (4711), 379–381.
Talwani P, Hasek, M., Gassman S. L, Doar, W. R, III, and Chapman, A. (2011). “Discovery of a sand blow and associated fault in the epicentral area of the 1886 Charleston earthquake.” Seismological Res. Letters, 82(4), 589–598.
Talwani, P., and Schaeffer, W.T. (2001). “Recurrence rates of large earthquakes in the South Carolina Coastal Plain based on the paleoliquefaction data.” J. Geophysical Research., 106 (B4), 6621–6642.
Tokimatsu, K., Tamura, S., Suzuki, H., and Katsumata, K. (2012). “Building damage associated with geotechnical problems in the 2011 Tohoku Pacific Earthquake.” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Geotechnical Society, 52(5), 956–974.
Van Ballegooy, S., Malan, P., Lacrosse, V., Jacka, M. W., Cubrinovski, M., Bray, J. D., O’Rourke, T. D., Crawford, S. A., and Cowan, H. (2014). “Assessment of liquefaction-induced land damage for residential Christchurch.” Earthquake Spectra, EERI, 30(1), 31–55.
Weems, R. E, and Lemon, E. (1984). “Geologic map of the Stallsville Quadrangle, Dorchester and Charleston counties, South Carolina.” US Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle, Map GQ-1581, 2 sheets.
Weems, R. E., Obermeier, S. F., Pavich, M. J., Gohn, G. S., and Rubin, M. (1986). “Evidence for three moderate to large prehistoric Holocene earthquakes near Charleston, South Carolina.” Proc. 3rdU.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Charleston, South Carolina, EERI, 1, 3–13.
Youd, T. L, and Noble, S. K. (1997). "Liquefaction criteria based on statistical and probabilistic analyses." Proc., NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, Technical Report NCEER-97-022, 201–205.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V: Liquefaction Triggering, Consequences, and Mitigation (GSP 290)
Pages: 463 - 472
Editors: Scott J. Brandenberg, Ph.D., University of California, Los Angeles, and Majid T. Manzari, Ph.D., George Washington University
ISBN (Online): 978-0-7844-8145-5

History

Published online: Jun 7, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Emad Gheibi, Ph.D., S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Sarah L. Gassman, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$116.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Paper
$35.00
Add to cart
Buy E-book
$116.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share