CASE STUDIES
Nov 12, 2010

Megaevents, Urban Management, and Macroeconomic Policy: 2007 Pan American Games in Rio de Janeiro

Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 137, Issue 2

Abstract

The growth of megaevents is related to changes within urban management paradigms and the corresponding economic analysis. As such, urban management and macroeconomic policy must be investigated together. This paper focuses on the relationships between the hosting of the 2007 Pan American (Pan Am) games, the budget management of Rio de Janeiro city, and Brazil’s macroeconomic policy, considering both the economic impacts and exploring possible alternative uses of the public resources. The games required a newly built infrastructure, demonstrating that hosting megaevents in developing countries requires more sacrifices than for cities in industrialized countries. These expenditures did not change the control policy of public debt, because the city’s management followed the principles of government policy. Therefore, the adjustment of the municipal budget occurred in other expenditures, especially health and education. Finally, Rio de Janeiro municipality did not have enough resources to host the Pan Am games, and the federal government had to promise financial support. Planning megaevents has a new dimension not usually discussed in the economic impact literature: the consequences of megaevents on the federalist equilibrium.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Andranovich, G., Burbank, M., and Heying, C. (2001). “Olympic cities: Lessons learned from mega-events politics.” J. Urban Aff., 23(2), 113–131.
“Arenas jazem seis meses após o Pan.” (2008). Folha de São Paulo Gazette, Jan. 20. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/indices/inde20012008.htm〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Baade, R., Nikolava, M., and Matheson, V. (2006). “A tale of two stadiums: Comparing the economic impact of Chicago’s Wrigley Field and U. S. Cellular Field.” Working Paper, n.6, International Association of Sports Economists, Limoges, France. 〈http://ideas.repec.org/p/hcx/wpaper/0608.html〉 (Nov. 13, 2009).
Boyle, M. (1997). “Civic boosterism in the politics of local economic development—‘Institutional positions’ and ‘strategic orientations’ in the consumption of hallmark events.” Environ. Plann. A, 29(11), 1975–1997.
Burbank, M. J., Andranovich, G., and Hehyng, C. H. (2002). “Mega-event, urban development and public policy.” Rev. Policy Res., 19(3), 179–202.
“Cidades da copa pedem R$ 20 bilhıes para União.” (2009). Folha de São Paulo Gazette, Jul. 5. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/esporte/fk0507200932.htm〉 (Nov. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
“Cifras olímpicas mobilizam as empreiteiras.” (2009). Folha de São Paulo Gazette, Oct. 25. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/dinheiro/fi2510200905.htm〉 (Nov. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Collins, A., Jones, C., and Munday, M. (2009). “Assessing the environmental impacts of mega sporting events: Two options?” Tourism Manage., 30(6), 828–837.
“Concessão teve dois editais, e CPI quer investigar licitação.” (2007). Folha de São Paulo Gazette (Folha Online), Apr. 6. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/esporte/fk0604200716.htm〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Costa, A. C., and de Cássia, C. (2007). “Megaoperação no Alemão deixa 19 mortos.” O Globo-Extra Gazette, Jun. 27. 〈http://extra.globo.com/rio/materias/2007/06/27/296547073.asp〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Crompton, J. L. (1995). “Economic impact analysis of sports facilities and events: Eleven sources of misapplication.” J. Sport Manage., 9(1), 14–35.
Federal Government of Brazil. (2000). “Complementary law 101, from May 4, 2000: Fiscal responsibility law." 〈http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/LCP/Lcp101.htm〉 (May 5, 2011).
Gold, J. R., and Gold, M. M. (2008). “Olympic cities: Regeneration, city rebranding and changing urban agendas.” Geogr. Compass, 2(1), 300–318.
“Governo admite que Parque Aquático Maria Lenk não serve para Olimpíada.” (2008). Folha de São Paulo Gazette (Folha Online), Dec. 2. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/esporte/ult92u473928.shtml〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Hiller, H. (2000). “Mega-events, urban boosterism and growth strategies: An analysis of the objectives and legitimations of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid.” Int. J. Urban Reg. Res., 24(2), 439–458.
Jones, C. (2001a). “A level playing field? Sports stadium infrastructure and urban development in the United Kingdom.” Environ. Plann. A, 33(5), 845–861.
Jones, C. (2001b). “Mega-events and host-region impacts: Determining the true worth of the 1999 Rugby World Cup.” Int. J. Tourism Res., 3(3), 241–251.
Kasimati, E. (2003). “Economic aspects and the summer Olympics: A review of related research.” Int. J. Tourism Res., 5, 433–444.
Kim, H. J., Gursoy, D., and Lee, S. (2006). “The impact of the 2002 World Cup on South Korea: Comparisons of pre- and post-games.” Tourism Manage., 27(1), 86–96.
Lefebvre, H. (2003). The urban revolution, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Matheson, V. (2004). “Economic multipliers and mega-event analysis.” 〈http://www.holycross.edu/departments/economics/RePEc/Matheson_Multipliers.pdf〉 (Feb. 13, 2009).
Matheson, V. (2006). “Mega-events: The effect of the world’s biggest sporting events on local, regional, and national economies.” 〈http://nogames.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/mega_events-matheson.pdf〉 (Feb. 13, 2009).
Matheson, V., and Baade, R. (2001). “Home run or wild pitch? Assessing the economic impact of Major League Baseball’s all-star game.” J. Sports Econ., 2(4), 307–327.
Matheson, V., and Baade, R. (2003). “Mega-sporting events in developing nations: Playing the way to prosperity?” 〈http://ideas.repec.org/p/hcx/wpaper/0404.html〉 (Nov. 13, 2009).
Matheson, V., and Baade, R. (2004). “An economic slam dunk or march madness? Assessing the economic impact of the NCAA basketball tournament.” The economics of college sports, J. Fizel and R. Fort, eds., Praeger, Westport, CT, 111–133.
Ministério Público Federal (MPF). (2007). “MPF/RJ consegue demolição de obras na Marina da Glória.” Notícias do Ministério Público Federal, 〈http://noticias.pgr.mpf.gov.br/noticias/noticias-do-site/copy_of_meio-ambiente-e-patrimonio-cultural/mpf-rj-consegue-demolicao-de-obras-na-marina-da-gloria/〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Mondelo, M. J., and Rishe, P. (2004). “Comparative economic impact analyses: Differences across cities, events, and demographics.” Econ. Dev. Q., 18(4), 331–342.
Official Gazette of the Rio de Janeiro Municipality. (2007). “Jogos Pan Americanos—Rio 2007—Prestação preliminar de contas.” Aug. 10, 1. 〈http://doweb.rio.rj.gov.br/sdcgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?&softpage=_infomain&infobase=10082007.nfo〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Oliveira, A. (2009). “Brazil: Economy, inequality and antagonisms.” Education, 1, 16–135.
Owen, J. G. (2005). “Estimating the cost and benefit of hosting olympic games: What can Beijing expect from its 2008 games?” Ind. Geogr., 3(1), 1–18.
Pillay, U., and Bass, O. (2009). “Mega-events as a response to poverty reduction: The 2010 World Cup and urban development.” Development and dreams: The urban legacy of 2010 Football World Cup, U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson, and O. Bass, eds., HRSC Press, Cape Town, South Africa.
“Rio troca dinheiro por retorno olímpico.” (2008). Folha de São Paulo Gazette, Mar. 18. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/esporte/fk1803200813.htm〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Sanchez, F. (2003). A reinvenção das cidades para um mercado mundial, Argos, Chapecó, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Smith, N. (2002). “New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy.” Antipode, 34(3), 427–450.
“Tribunais redigem lei por Mundial e Olimpíada.” (2009). Folha de São Paulo Gazette, Oct. 23. 〈http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/esporte/fk2310200921.htm〉 (Nov. 11, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Tribunal de Contas da União—TCU (Brazilian Federal Court of Audit). (2008). Acórdão 2101/2008, 〈http://contas.tcu.gov.br/portaltextual/MostraDocumento?doc=4&p=0&qn=1&templ=formatado_99〉 (Feb. 13, 2009) (in Portuguese).
Vainer, C. B. (2000). “Pátria, Empresa e mercadoria.” A cidade do pensamento único: Desmanchando consensos, O. Arantes, C. B. Vainer, and E. e Maricato, eds., Vozes, Petrópolis, Brazil, 75–104 (in Portuguese).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 137Issue 2June 2011
Pages: 184 - 192

History

Received: Jun 10, 2009
Accepted: Aug 29, 2010
Published online: Nov 12, 2010
Published in print: Jun 1, 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alberto de Oliveira, Ph.D. [email protected]
Economist, Urban and Regional Planning by UFRJ and Professor, Institute of Urban and Regional Planning and Research, the Federal Univ. of Rio de Janeiro (IPPUR/UFRJ). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share