Impacts of Transportation External Cost Pricing and Transit Fare Reductions on Household Mode/Route Choices and Environmental Improvements
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 136, Issue 4
Abstract
This study explores how transportation external cost pricing and transit fare reductions impact household mode/route choices and environmental improvements in a metropolitan area. A household mode/route choice model and a bilevel model for transportation external cost pricing and transit fare reductions are sequentially constructed. In the first level of bilevel model, the pricing of transportation external costs, including congestion, air pollution, and noise, is measured applying the theory of marginal-cost pricing. The effects of transportation external cost pricing are analyzed in terms of variations in household mode/route choices, increased patronage of rail transit lines and reduced congestion, air pollution, and noise. In the second level of bilevel model, this study explores how to reduce rail transit fares to achieve equivalent benefits of environmental improvement as for the strategy of transportation external cost pricing. The analytical results reveal that, after the implementation of transportation external cost pricing and taxation, the number of commuting households attracted to rail transit lines will increase, and some commuting households may detour to more distant transit stations to avoid high congestion links on surface streets.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research under Contract No. NSCTNSC91-2415-H-009-004.
References
Benjamin, J., Kurauchi, S., Morikawa, T., Polydoropoulou, A., Sasaki, K., and Ben-Akiva, M. (1998). “Forecasting paratransit ridership using discrete choice models with explicit consideration of availability.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1618, 60–65.
Daganzo, C. F., and Garcia, R. C. (2000). “A Pareto improving strategy for the time-dependent morning commute problem.” Transp. Sci., 34(3), 303–311.
De Borger, B., and Wouters, S. (1998). “Transport externalities and optimal pricing and supply decisions in urban transportation: A simulation analysis for Belgium.” Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 28, 163–197.
Hsu, C. I., and Guo, S. P. (1999). “Access mode combinations for intercity transportation terminals in a metropolitan area.” Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 3(2), 333–348.
Hsu, C. I., and Guo, S. P. (2001). “Household-mode choice and residential-rent distribution in a metropolitan area with surface road and rail transit networks.” Envir. Plan. A, 33(9), 1547–1575.
Hsu, C. I., and Guo, S. P. (2005). “Externality reductions in residential areas due to rail transit networks.” Ann. Reg. Sci., 38, 1–12.
Johansson, O. (1997). “Optimal road-pricing: Simultaneous treatment of time losses, increased fuel consumption and emissions.” Transp. Res. D, 2(2), 77–87.
Koppelman, F. S., Bhat, C. R., and Schofer, J. L. (1993). “Market-research evaluation of actions to reduce suburban traffic congestion—Commuter travel behavior and response to demand reduction actions.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 27(5), 383–393.
Lam, W. H. K., et al. (1999). “A stochastic user equilibrium assignment model for congested transit networks.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 33, 351–368.
Ling, J. H. (1998). “Transit fare differentials: A theoretical analysis.” J. Adv. Transp., 32(3), 297–314.
Lo, H. K., and Hickman, M. D. (1997). “Toward an evaluation framework for road pricing.” J. Transp. Eng., 123(4), 316–324.
Lo, H. K., Yip, C. W., and Wan, K. H. (2003). “Modeling transfer and non-linear fare structure in multi-modal network.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 37, 149–170.
Lozano, A., and Storchi, G. (2001). “Shortest viable path algorithm in multimodal networks.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 35, 225–241.
Mayeres, I. (2000). “The efficiency effects of transport policies in the presence of externalities and distortionary taxes.” J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 34(2), 233–260.
Mayeres, I., Ochelen, S., and Proost, S. (1996). “The marginal external costs of urban transport.” Transp. Res. D, 1(2), 111–130.
Romilly, P. (1999). “Substitution of bus for car travel in urban Britain: An economic evaluation of bus and car exhaust emission and other costs.” Transp. Res. D, 4, 109–125.
Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Taylor, S. R. W., and Carter, D. W. (1998). “Maryland mass transit administration fare simplification-effects on ridership and revenue.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1618, 125–130.
Tsamboulas, D., and Mikroudis, G. (2000). “EFECT—Evaluation framework of environmental impacts and costs of transport initiatives.” Transp. Res. D, 5, 283–303.
Verhoef, E. T. (2000). “The implementation of marginal external cost pricing in road transport.” Papers in Regional Science, 79, 307–332.
Yang, H., and Bell, M. G. H. (1997). “Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 31(4), 303–314.
Yang, H., and Huang, H. J. (1997). “Analysis of the time-varying pricing of a bottleneck with elastic demand using optimal control theory.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 31(6), 425–440.
Yang, H., and Huang, H. J. (1998). “Principle of marginal-cost pricing: How does it work in a general road network.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 32(1), 45–54.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Oct 28, 2008
Accepted: Apr 14, 2010
Published online: Nov 15, 2010
Published in print: Dec 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.