Does a Technology Incubator Work in the Regional Economy? Evidence from South Korea
Publication: Journal of Urban Planning and Development
Volume 136, Issue 3
Abstract
There has been a recent trend among policymakers to consider the science park as a knowledge-based economic development strategy—one that encourages and supports the start-up and development of innovation-led industry. This paper assesses the effectiveness of the South Korean technopark. Technoparks on average had a higher number of tenants, tenant employees, and tenant firm sales compared to those of the other business incubators in Korea. Although the survival rate was relatively high in technoparks compared to that of the other business incubators, some of the technoparks were not effective at encouraging tenants to graduate from the incubator in a timely manner. The support program provided by the technopark format enables firms to easily access innovation resources and to reduce the costs of doing business. The incubator reduces the operating costs of tenant firms by providing facilities and shared services at low cost as well as aiding in market expansion. Moreover, the incubator provides tenant firms with research and development support, which results in the enhancement of innovation capability. Nonetheless, the strategies of the technopark and local government have not been sufficiently thorough in encouraging the incubated firms to settle in the same jurisdiction, in order to promote regional economic growth and to stimulate a continuous regional innovation system. We explored the organizational performance of the technopark and ascertained the relationship between the organizational effectiveness and the performance outcome. Local government and the technopark should coown the objectives and connect their support systems, to lead the firms incubated in a technopark to settle and grow successfully in the local region. This examination of working technoparks in South Korea will contribute to the development of strategies for creating science parks in other developing countries.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allen, D. N., and Bazan, E. J. (1990). Value-added contribution of Pennsylvania’s business incubators and enterprise development, Pennsylvania State Univ.–University Park, State College, PA.
Allen, D. N., and McCluskey, R. (1990). “Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry.” Entrepreneurship Theory Pract., 15(2), 61–77.
Amirahmadi, H., and Saff, G. (1993). “Science parks: A critical assessment.” J. Plann. Lit., 8(2), 107–123.
Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., and Giorgio, P. (2006). “Assessing science parks’ performances: Directions from selected Italian case studies.” Technovation, 26, 489–505.
Colombo, M. G., and Delmastro, M. (2002). “How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy.” Res. Policy, 31, 1103–1122.
Daegu Technopark Co. (2005). “The report on the Daegu technopark project.” Rep. Prepared for Daegu Technopark Co., Daegu, Korea (in Korean).
Gyeongbuk Technopark Co. (2005). “The report on the Gyeongbuk technopark project.” Rep. Prepared for Gyeongbuk Technopark Co., Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea (in Korean).
Gyeonggi Technopark Co. (2005). “The report on the Gyeonggi technopark project.” Rep. Prepared for Gyeonggi Technopark Co., Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (in Korean).
Hackett, S. M., and Dilts, D. M. (2004). “A systematic review of business incubation research.” J. Tech. Tran., 29, 55–82.
Hassink, R. (2001). “Towards regionally embedded innovation support systems in South Korea? Case studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyounggi.” Urban Stud., 38(8), 1373–1395.
Kwon, Y. S., and Byeon, S. I. (2001). Model technopark project and building the regional innovation system in Korea, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Anyang, Korea (in Korean).
Lalkaka, R., and Abetti, P. A. (1999). “Business incubation and enterprise support systems in restructuring countries.” Bus. Incubat. Ent. Support Sys., 8(3), 197–209.
Löfsten, H., and Lindelöf, P. (2002). “Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—Academic-industry links, innovation and markets.” Res. Policy, 31, 859–876.
Mian, S. A. (1996). “Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms.” Res. Policy, 25, 325–335.
Mian, S. A. (1997). “Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework.” J. Bus. Venturing, 12(4), 251–285.
Monlar, L. A., et al. (1997). Business incubation works, NBIA Publications, Athens, OH.
National Business Incubation Association (NBIA). (2002). “Measuring your business incubator’s economic impact: A toolkit.” ⟨http://www.nbia.org/⟩ (Dec. 10, 2008).
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2001). Innovative clusters drivers of national innovation systems, Paris.
Peters, L., Rice, M., and Sundararajan, M. (2004). “The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process.” J. Tech. Tran., 29, 83–91.
Plosila, W. H., and Allen, D. N. (1985). “Small business incubators and public policy: Implications for states and local development strategies.” Policy Stud. J., 13(4), 729–734.
Presidential Commission on Small and Medium Enterprise. (2003). “The report on assessment of nurturing new business and incubation.” Rep. Prepared for Presidential Commission on Small and Medium Enterprise, Seoul, Korea (in Korean).
RESI. (2001). Maryland incubator impact analysis, Maryland Technology Development Corporation, Columbia, Md.
Rothaermel, F. T., and Thursby, M. (2005). “Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages.” Res. Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090.
Sherman, H., and Chappell, D. S. (1998). “Methodological challenges in evaluating business incubator outcomes.” Econ. Dev. Q., 12, 313–321.
Songdo Technopark Co. (2005). “The report on Songdo technopark project.” Rep. Prepared for Songdo Technopark Co., Incheon, Korea (in Korean).
Struyk, R. J., and James, F. J. (1975). Intrametropolitan industrial location: The pattern and process of change, D.C. Health and Co., Lexington, Mass.
Westhead, P., Batstone, S., and Martin, F. (2000). “Technology-based firms located in science parks: The applicability of Bullock’s “soft-hard” model.” Enterprise Innovat. Manag. Stud., 1(2), 107–139.
Williamson, O. E. (1978). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. The Free Press, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 4, 2008
Accepted: Sep 18, 2009
Published online: Oct 2, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.