Technical Papers
Dec 12, 2012

Impact of Variable Hydraulic Conductivity on Bioretention Cell Performance and Implications for Construction Standards

Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 139, Issue 7

Abstract

Bioretention cells have become an accepted technology for storm-water management due to their potential benefits in runoff volume reduction and water quality improvement. Over the years, a considerable amount of research has been done to improve performance, whether by improved functionality or by introducing engineered filter media to target specific contaminants. The design for a full-scale demonstration project carried out in Oklahoma incorporated a sand and fly ash filter for enhanced phosphorus adsorption and surface sand plugs for improved infiltration. Samples taken from the filter media during construction exhibited heterogeneity in fly ash content, and therefore, hydraulic conductivity due to the pozzolanic property of fly ash. Maximizing contaminant attenuation will require achieving uniform flow through the cell to ensure use of the entire filter volume. Thus, it is important to understand how the small-scale filter heterogeneity and the large-scale sand plugs impact performance of this design. To do this, a three-dimensional finite element model was developed in a software tool to simulate saturated flow through a bioretention cell. Three general configurations were modeled for three different scenarios. A filter-only configuration was evaluated to assess the effect of filter media hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity on flow through the cell. The second configuration added a top soil and sand plug layer with six sand plugs measuring 1.5 m by 1.5 m, which was similar to the constructed cells. The final configuration evaluated a top soil and sand plug layer with 14 smaller sand plugs only 1 m by 1 m. Three different scenarios were evaluated for each configuration that varied by size and distribution of the filter media heterogeneity. The first scenario used the measured scale and range variability, while the second used the same scale with double the variation, and the third used the same variability, but increased the scale volume by a factor of 27. Model results indicate that variability in fly ash content creates complex flow through the filter medium, but does not result in significant preferential flow. Sand plugs create some flow concentration but do not dominate flow within the cell, and the number of sand plugs is not significant provided that their total area is appropriate to maintain the desired drainage rate.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aravena, J. E., and Dussailant, A. (2009). “Storm-water infiltration and focused recharge modeling with finite-volume two-dimensional richards equation: Application to an experimental rain garden.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 135(12), 1073–1080.
Asleson, B. C., Nestingen, R. S., Gulliver, J. S., Hozalski, R. M., and Nieber, J. L. (2009). “Performance assessment of rain gardens.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(4), 1019–1031.
Bauters, T. W. J., DiCarlo, D. A., Steenhuis, T. S., and Parlange, J. (2000). “Soil water content dependent wetting front characteristics in sands.” J. Hydrol., 231(1–4), 244–254.
Bedan, E. S., and Clausen, J. C. (2009). “Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from traditional and low impact development watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 45(4), 998–1008.
Brown, R. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2008). “Bioretention performance in the upper coastal plain of North Carolina.” Proc., 2008 ASCE Int. Low Impact Development Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Brown, R. A., and Hunt, W. F., III (2010). “Impacts of construction activity on bioretention performance.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(6), 386–394.
Carpenter, D. D., and Hallam, L. (2010). “Influence of planting soil mix characteristics on bioretention cell design and performance.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 15(6), 404–416.
Chavez, R. A., Brown, G. O., and Storm, D. E. (2006). “Bioretention cell design for full scale project in Grove, Oklahoma.”, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
Chavez, R. A., Brown, G. O., and Storm, D. E. (2007). “Bioretention cell design and construction specifications.”, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
Chavez, R. A., Brown, G. O., and Storm, D. E. (2008). “Bioretention cell construction.”, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
Christianson, R. D., Brown, G. O., Chavez, R. A., and Storm, D. E. (2012). “Modeling field-scale bioretention cells with heterogeneous infiltration media.” Trans. ASABE, 55(4) 1193–1201.
COMSOL. (2008). COMSOL multiphysics 3.5a: Earth science module user guide, COMSOL, Inc., Los Angeles.
Diblasi, C. J., Li, H., Davis, A. P., and Ghosh, U. (2009). “Removal and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants in an urban stormwater bioretention facility.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(2), 494–502.
He, Z., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Unit process modeling of stormwater flow and pollution sorption in a bioretention cell.” Proc., 2009 ASCE World Water & Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–9.
Li, H., and Davis, A. P. (2008). “Heavy metal capture and accumulation in bioretention media.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(14), 5247–5253.
Li, H., and Davis, A. P. (2009). “Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention.” J. Environ. Eng., 135(8), 567–576.
Minitab 15. [Computer software]. Minitab, Inc., State College, PA.
Passeport, E., Hunt, W. F., Line, D. E., Smith, R. A., and Brown, R. A. (2009). “Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 135(4), 505–510.
Sharkey, L. J., and Hunt, W. F., III (2005). “Design implications on bioretention performance as a stormwater BMP: Water quality and quantity.”, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
Thompson, A. M., Paul, A. C., and Balster, N. J. (2008). “Physical and hydraulic properties of engineered soil media for bioretention basins.” Trans. ASABE, 51(2), 499–514.
Zhang, W., Brown, G. O., and Storm, D. E. (2008a). “Enhancement of heavy metals retention in sandy soil by amendment with fly ash.” Trans. ASABE, 51(4), 1247–1254.
Zhang, W., Brown, G. O., and Storm, D. E. (2008b). “Fly ash-amended sand as filter media in bioretention cells to improve phosphorus removal.” Water Environ. Res., 80(6), 507–516.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 139Issue 7July 2013
Pages: 707 - 715

History

Received: Jan 27, 2012
Accepted: Dec 10, 2012
Published online: Dec 12, 2012
Published in print: Jul 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rebecca A. Chavez [email protected]
S.M.ASCE
Research Engineer, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Glenn O. Brown
M.ASCE
Regents Professor, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074.
Dan E. Storm
Professor, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74074.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share