Technical Papers
Nov 27, 2021

Risk Assessment Model for Optimal Gain–Pain Share Ratio in Target Cost Contract for Construction Projects

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148, Issue 2

Abstract

Recently various contracting methods have been introduced for construction projects. Target cost contracts have been used widely where risk can be shared between contract parties. This gain–pain sharing method has proven its efficiency as a fair contracting method, but it depends on the adopted gain–pain share ratio. Minimal research efforts have quantified the optimal gain–pain share using game theory simulation. This research closes the gap by developing a mathematical formulation of the utility functions for both contract parties (i.e., the owner and the contractor) in target cost contracts. The effect of the risk-sharing rate on the behavior of the contact parties and risk direction was modeled. The developed mathematical model was analyzed to consider all possible scenarios. A simulation analysis that considered project characteristics and construction cost variations was performed to provide a robust valuation of potential risk allocation in determining the optimal share ratio using real-world construction data. The results showed that the optimal gain–pain share ratio varies according to the difference between the construction project cost variation and the contractor’s efforts fees. It is practical to set different gain–pain share ratios based on the construction project characteristics and the contractor’s efforts fees to satisfy contract parties in this complicated and interconnected relationship. Quantifying the optimal gain–pain share ratio helps to produce more-reliable target cost contracts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or codes generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may be provided only with restrictions. These data are still in use to develop future research.

References

Alves, T. C. L., W. Lichtig, and Z. K. Rybkowski. 2017. “Implementing target value design: Tools and techniques to manage the process.” HERD 10 (3): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717690865.
Alwisy, A., A. Bouferguene, and M. Al-Hussein. 2020. “Framework for target cost modelling in construction projects.” Int. J. Construct. Manage. 20 (2): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1462446.
Arditi, D., and H. M. Günaydın. 1997. “Total quality management in the construction process.” Int. J. Project Manage. 15 (4): 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00076-2.
Barnes, M. 1983. “How to allocate risks in construction contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 1 (1): 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(83)90034-0.
Bertoni, A., M. Bertoni, M. Panarotto, C. Johansson, and T. Larsson. 2015. “Expanding value driven design to meet lean product service development.” Procedia CIRP 30: 197–202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555382.
Binmore, K., A. Rubinstein, and A. Wolinsky. 1986. “The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling.” Rand J. Econ. 17 (2): 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00035-1.
Broome, J. C., and J. Perry. 2002. “How practitioners set share fractions in target cost contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00035-1.
Carmichael, D. G. 2000. Contracts and international project management. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Cattell, D. W., P. A. Bowen, and A. P. Kaka. 2011. “Proposed framework for applying cumulative prospect theory to an unbalanced bidding model.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000367.
Chan, D. W. M., A. P. C. Chan, P. T. Lam I, and J. M. W. Wong. 2011. “An empirical survey of the motives and benefits of adopting guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction.” Int. J. Project Manage. 29 (5): 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.002.
Chan, D. W. M., P. T. I. Lam, A. P. C. Chan, and J. M. W. Wong. 2010. “Achieving better performance through target cost contracts: The tale of an underground railway station modification project.” Facilities 28 (5–6): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011031501.
Chan, J. H. L., D. W. M. Chan, A. P. C. Chan, and P. T. I. Lam. 2012. “Risk mitigation strategies for guaranteed maximum price and target cost contracts in construction: A factor analysis approach.” J. Facil. Manage. 10 (1): 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14725961211200379.
Chan, P. C., W. M. Chan, L. C. N. Fan, T. I. Lam, and J. F. Y. Yeung. 2004. “A comparative study of project partnering practices in Hong Kong.” In Proc., The CII-HK Conf. 2004 on Construction Partnering: Our Partnering Journey—Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Heading?, 65–75. Hong Kong: Construction Industry Institute.
Chang, C.-Y. 2014. “Principal-agent model of risk allocation in construction contracts and its critique.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (1): 04013032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000779.
Cheng, R. L. 2004. “Investigation of the application of guaranteed maximum price in the Hong Kong construction industry.” Unpublished B.Sc. (Hons) dissertation, Dept. of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ.
Dacey, R. 2003. “The S-shaped utility function.” Synthese 135 (2): 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023465024536.
DellaVigna, S., and D. Pope. 2017. “What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts.” Rev. Econ. Stud. 85 (2): 1029–1069. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx033.
de Melo, R. S. S., D. Do, P. Tillmann, G. Ballard, and A. D. Granja. 2016. “Target value design in the public sector: Evidence from a hospital project in San Francisco, CA.” Archit. Eng. Des. Manage. 12 (2): 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2015.1106398.
Dixit, V. 2020. “Risk assessment of different sourcing contract scenarios in project procurement.” Int. J. Constr. Manage. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1728610.
Doloi, H. 2013. “Empirical analysis of traditional contracting and relationship agreements for procuring partners in construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (3): 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000141.
Dorsey, R. W. 1997. Project delivery systems for building construction. Washington, DC: Associated General Contractors of America.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Agency theory: An assessment and review.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191.
Ferriéres, S. 2016. “Four essays on the axiomatic method: Cooperative game theory and scientometrics.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Economics and Finance, Université de Franche-Comté.
Holt, G. D., P. O. Olomolaiye, and F. C. Harris. 1995. “A review of contractor selection practice in the U.K. construction industry.” Build. Environ. 30 (4): 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(95)00008-T.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2013. “Optimal incentive contract with risk-neutral contractor.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (8): 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000663.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2014a. “Optimal sharing arrangement for multiple project outcomes.” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 19 (3): 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-09-2013-0038.
Hosseinian, S. M., and D. G. Carmichael. 2014b. “An optimal target cost contract with a risk neutral owner.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 21 (5): 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2013-0003.
Hosseinian, S. M., E. Farahpour, and D. G. Carmichael. 2020. “Optimum outcome-sharing construction contracts with multiagent and multioutcome arrangements.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (7): 04020067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001862.
Hou, F., Y. Zhai, and X. You. 2020. “An equilibrium in group decision and its association with the Nash equilibrium in game theory.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 139 (Jan): 106138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106138.
Jeong, H., H. Seo, and H. Kim. 2018. “Game theory–based analysis of decision making for coastal adaptation under multilateral participation.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (6): 04018034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000637.
Jung, W., G. Ballard, Y.-W. Kim, and S. H. Han. 2012. “Understanding of target value design for integrated project delivery with the context of game theory.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2012, 556–563. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(95)00008-T.
Laan, A., H. Voordijk, and G. Dewulf. 2011. “Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance.” Int. J. Manage Project Bus. 4 (4): 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371111164065.
Lahdenperä, P. 2010. “Conceptualizing a two-stage target-cost arrangement for competitive cooperation.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 28 (7): 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.487534.
Laryea, S. 2016. “Risk apportionment in target cost contracts.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Manage. Procurement Law 169 (6): 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.15.00046.
Love, P. E. D., P. R. Davis, R. Chevis, and D. J. Edwards. 2011. “Risk/reward compensation model for civil engineering infrastructure alliance projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (2): 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000263.
Love, P. E. D., D. Mistry, and P. R. Davis. 2010. “Price competitive alliance projects: Identification of success factors for public clients.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (9): 947–956. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000208.
Masterman, J. W. E. 2002. An introduction to building procurement systems. New York: Routledge.
Meng, X., and B. Gallagher. 2012. “The impact of incentive mechanisms on project performance.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (3): 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.006.
Myerson, R. 1991. Game theory: Analysis of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Odeh, A. M., and H. T. Battaineh. 2002. “Causes of construction delay: Traditional contracts.” Int. J. Project Manage. 20 (1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00037-5.
Oliver, A. 2018. “Your money and your life: Risk attitudes over gains and losses.” J. Risk Uncertainty 57 (1): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-018-9284-4.
Papajohn, D., M. El Asmar, K. R. Molenaar, and D. Alleman. 2020. “Comparing contract administration functions for alternative and traditional delivery of highway projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (1): 04019038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000727.
Perry, J. G., and M. Barnes. 2000. “Target cost contracts: An analysis of the interplay between fee, target, share and price.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 7 (2): 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021145.
Puddicombe, M. S. 2009. “Why contracts: Evidence.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (8): 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:8(675).
Rahman, M. M., and M. M. Kumaraswamy. 2002. “Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 20 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110089682.
Rybkowski, Z. K., M. Munankami, M. M. Shepley, and J. L. Fernández-Solis. 2016. “Development and testing of a lean simulation to illustrate key principles of target value design: A first run study.” In Proc., 24th Annual Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction, 133–142. Boston: International Group for Lean Construction.
Shehadeh, A., O. Alshboul, R. E. Al Mamlook, and O. Hamedat. 2021. “Machine learning models for predicting the residual value of heavy construction equipment: An evaluation of modified decision tree, LightGBM, and XGBoost regression.” Autom. Constr. 129 (Sep): 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103827.
Smith, A. J. 2017. Estimating, tendering and bidding for construction work. London: Macmillan Education.
Stevens, D. E., and A. Thevaranjan. 2010. “A moral solution to the moral hazard problem.” Accounting Organ. Soc. 35 (1): 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.008.
Stroh, L. K., J. M. Brett, J. P. Baumann, and A. H. Reilly. 1996. “Agency theory and variable pay compensation strategies.” Acad. Manage. J. 39 (3): 751–767.
Trench, D. 1992. ON TARGET: A design and manage target cost procurement system. London: Thomas Telford.
Turocy, T., and B. Stengel. 2001. Game theory. CDAM research report LSE-CDAM-2001-09. London: Centre for Discrete and Applicable Mathematics, London School of Economics & Political Science.
Uzhga-Rebrov, O., and P. Grabusts. 2021. “Cumulative prospect theory version with fuzzy values of outcome estimates.” Risks 9 (4): 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9040072.
von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1947. Theory of games and economic behavior. 2nd rev. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1038/157172a0.
Wamuziri, S., and A. Seywright. 2005. “Risk sharing and effective incentives in collaborative procurement.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 21st Annual ARCOM Conf., SOAS, edited by F. Khosrowshahi, 1175–1184. London: Univ. of London.
Watermeyer, R. 2009. “Getting to grips with the NEC3 ECC target contract with activity schedule.” Accessed January 1, 2009. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC26023.
Weitzman, M. L. 1980. “Efficient incentive contracts.” Q. J. Econ. 94 (4): 719–730. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885665.
Yeung, J. F. Y., A. P. C. Chan, and D. W. M. Chan. 2012. “Defining relational contracting from the Wittgenstein family-resemblance philosophy.” Int. J. Project Manage. 30 (2): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 148Issue 2February 2022

History

Received: Feb 21, 2021
Accepted: Oct 5, 2021
Published online: Nov 27, 2021
Published in print: Feb 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Hijjawi Faculty for Engineering Technology, Yarmouk Univ., P.O. Box 566, Irbid 21163, Jordan. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6875-4824. Email: [email protected]
Odey Alshboul, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hashemite Univ., P.O. Box 330127, Zarqa 13133, Jordan. Email: [email protected]
Ola Hamedat [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Business Administration, Jadara Univ., Irbid 21110, Jordan (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Effectiveness of Image Augmentation Techniques on Detection of Building Characteristics from Street View Images Using Deep Learning, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-15075, 150, 10, (2024).
  • Optimal Sharing of Construction Project Outcomes with Downstream Contracting Parties: Principal–Agent Analysis, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13652, 150, 2, (2024).
  • Division of Cost Deviations in Integrated Project Delivery Systems Using Cooperative Game Theory, Construction Research Congress 2024, 10.1061/9780784485286.004, (31-41), (2024).
  • Construction of Frugal Innovation Path in the Context of Digital Transformation: A Study Based on NCA and QCA, Sustainability, 10.3390/su15032158, 15, 3, (2158), (2023).
  • An Integrated Quality Index of High-Rise Residential Buildings for All Lifecycle Stages of a Construction Facility, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app13032014, 13, 3, (2014), (2023).
  • Prediction Liquidated Damages via Ensemble Machine Learning Model: Towards Sustainable Highway Construction Projects, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14159303, 14, 15, (9303), (2022).
  • Extreme Gradient Boosting-Based Machine Learning Approach for Green Building Cost Prediction, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14116651, 14, 11, (6651), (2022).
  • Forecasting Liquidated Damages via Machine Learning-Based Modified Regression Models for Highway Construction Projects, Sustainability, 10.3390/su14105835, 14, 10, (5835), (2022).
  • Optimization of the Structural Performance of Buried Reinforced Concrete Pipelines in Cohesionless Soils, Materials, 10.3390/ma15124051, 15, 12, (4051), (2022).
  • Minimizing Liability of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Construction Contracts—A Structural Equation Model for Risk Mitigation of Force Majeure Impacts, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings13010070, 13, 1, (70), (2022).
  • See more

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share