Technical Papers
Sep 6, 2021

Gender Bias and Its Impact on Self-Concept in Undergraduate and Graduate Construction Education Programs in the United States

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147, Issue 11

Abstract

Previous studies argued that gender bias has an effect on the retention of female students in male-dominated academic programs. This study examined the prevalence of gender bias in construction education programs from different sources and the impact on students’ self-concept. Participants responded to a quantitative survey measuring gender bias, construction education self-concept, supportiveness of peers, and group identity. Results indicated that 87% of female students experienced gender bias in the previous year, which emanated significantly more often from male peers than from female peers, mentors or advisors, or professors. Gender bias had a direct impact on students’ self-concept, as did group identity. These findings suggest that interventions attempting to curtail gender bias in construction education programs should focus on male peers as their primary target and professors as a secondary target. Strategies to build group identity likely will improve students’ self-concept. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by exploring gender bias in construction degree programs and the impact of these experiences on student’s self-concept, and by providing evidence-based recommendations for fostering the inclusion of women in construction-related academic programs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository online in accordance with funder data retention policies. The raw data of the survey response can be downloaded at https://www.dropbox.com/s/ltahnss9aet1frt/CMGenderBiasData.xlsx?dl=0.

References

AGC (Associated General Contractors of America). 2018. “The workforce development plan 2.0: AGC of America’s new plan to address growing construction workforce shortages.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.agc.org/sites/default/files/Files/Communications/Workforce_Development_Plan_2.0_FINAL.pdf.
Banchefsky, S., and B. Park. 2018. “Negative gender ideologies and gender-science stereotypes are more pervasive in male-dominated academic disciplines.” Soc. Sci. 7 (2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020027.
Bhatia, S., and J. P. Amati. 2010. “‘If these women can do it, I can do it too’: Building women engineering leaders through graduate peer mentoring.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 10 (4): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000081.
Bigelow, B. F., D. Bilbo, M. Mathew, L. Ritter, and J. W. Elliott. 2015. “Identifying the most effective factors in attracting female undergraduate students to construction management.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 11 (3): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2014.1002639.
Bigelow, B. F., D. Bilbo, L. Ritter, M. Mathew, and J. W. Elliott. 2016. “An evaluation of factors for retaining female students in construction management programs.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 12 (1): 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2015.1085927.
Bigelow, B. F., A. Saseendran, and J. W. Elliott. 2018. “Attracting students to construction education programs: An exploration of perceptions by gender.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 14 (3): 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1280101.
Bigelow, B. F., V. Zarate, J. Soto, J. Arenas, and A. Perrenoud. 2019. “Attracting and retaining tradespeople, an evaluation of influencers on construction workers in two different trades in Texas.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 15 (3): 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1280103.
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2019a. “Construction managers.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/management/construction-managers.htm.
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2019b. “Employment projections: Employment by major occupational group, 2018 and projected 2028.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/emp-by-major-occupational-group.htm.
BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). 2019c. “Labor force statistics from the current population survey: Employed persons by detailed industry, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 2018.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat18.htm.
Boysen, G. A. 2009. “A review of experimental studies of explicit and implicit bias among counselors.” J. Multicultural Couns. Dev. 37 (4): 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2009.tb00106.x.
Cameron, J. E. 2004. “A three-factor model of social identity.” Self Identity 3 (3): 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000047.
Elliott, J. W., M. K. Thevenin, and C. Lopez del Puerto. 2016. “Role of gender and industry experience in construction management student self-efficacy, motivation, and planned behavior.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 12 (1): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2015.1016137.
Greenwald, A. G., and L. H. Krieger. 2006. “Implicit bias: Scientific foundations.” Calif. Law Rev. 94 (4): 945–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/20439056.
Groen, C., D. R. Simmons, and M. Turner. 2019. “Developing resilience: Experiencing and managing stress in a US undergraduate construction program.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 145 (2): 04019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000407.
Hegewisch, A., J. Henrici, E. Shaw, and T. Hooper. 2014. ‘Untapped resources, untapped labor pool: Using federal highway funds to prepare women for careers in construction.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561239.pdf.
Hegewisch, A., and H. Luyri. 2010. “The Workforce Investment Act and women’s progress: Does WIA funded training reinforce sex segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap?” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/C372.pdf.
Hegewisch, A., and B. O’Farrell. 2014. “Women in construction and the economic recovery: Results from the 2013 IWPR tradeswomen survey.” Accessed September 22, 2020. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.564.5723&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Kaiser, C. R., and K. E. Spalding. 2015. “Do women who succeed in male-dominated domains help other women? The moderating role of gender identification.” Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 45 (5): 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2113.
Kaminsky, J., C. Casias, A. Javernick-Will, and C. Leslie. 2012. “Expected outcomes of a construction career: Gender identity and Engineers without borders-USA.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 2071–2080. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Lopez del Puerto, C. L., J. Shane, and A. A. Guggemos. 2011. “Exploration of strategies for attracting and retaining female construction management students.” In Proc., Annual Int. Conf. Associated Schools of Construction. Cheyenne, WY: Associated Schools of Construction.
McCuen, R. H., and J. Greenberg. 2009. “Educating guidance counselors on engineering as a career and academic choice.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 135 (3): 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2009)135:3(91).
McGuire, G. M., and J. Reger. 2003. “Feminist co-mentoring: A model for academic professional development.” NWSA J. 15 (1): 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/228350.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2013. “Bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2011–12.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_318.30.asp.
NCES (National Center for Education Statistics). 2018. “Bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor’s degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2016–17.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_318.30.asp.
Robnett, R. 2012. “The role of peer support for girls and women in the STEM pipeline: Implications for identity and anticipated retention.” Int. J. Gender Sci. Technol. 5 (3): 232–253.
Robnett, R. D. 2016. “Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept.” Psychol. Women Q. 40 (1): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162.
Robnett, R. D., P. A. Nelson, E. L. Zurbriggen, F. J. Crosby, and M. M. Chemers. 2018. “Research mentoring and scientist identity: Insights from undergraduates and their mentors.” Int. J. STEM Educ. 5 (1): 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0139-y.
Seron, C., S. Silbey, E. Cech, and B. Rubineau. 2018. “‘I am not a feminist, but…’: Hegemony of a meritocratic ideology and the limits of critique among women in engineering.” Work Occupations 45 (2): 131–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888418759774.
Sewalk, S., and K. Nietfield. 2013. “Barriers preventing women from enrolling in construction management programs.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 9 (4): 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2013.764362.
Shane, J., C. L. Lopez del Puerto, K. Strong, K. Mauro, and R. Wiley-Jones. 2012. “Retaining women students in a construction engineering undergraduate program by balancing integration and identity in student communities.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 8 (3): 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2011.605435.
Thevenin, M. K., and J. W. Elliott. 2018. “The role of supportive others in academic decisions; differences in construction management students by gender.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 14 (4): 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2017.1319884.
Tsui, L. 2009. “Recruiting females into male dominated programs: Effective strategies and approaches.” J. Coll. Admission 8–13.
Wang, M.-T., and J. Degol. 2013. “Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields.” Dev. Rev. 33 (4): 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001.
Wilkes, J. T., M. C. Nobe, C. M. Clevenger, and J. E. Cross. 2015. “Needs assessment: Identifying and addressing high school counselors’ perceptions of construction management.” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 11 (3): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2014.987360.
Williams, J. C., and R. Dempsey. 2014. What works for women at work: Four patterns working women need to know. New York: New York University Press.
Williams, J. C., S. Li R. Rincon, and P. Finn. 2016. “Climate control: Gender and racial bias in engineering.” Accessed September 22, 2020. https://worklifelaw.org/publications/Climate-Control-Gender-And-Racial-Bias-In-Engineering.pdf.
Women’s Bureau. 2019. “Employment and earnings by occupation.” Accessed August 16, 2021. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/occupations.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 147Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Oct 15, 2020
Accepted: Jul 26, 2021
Published online: Sep 6, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 6, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Amy King-Lewis, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Division of Engineering Technology, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-042X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Likeability versus Competence Dilemma: Text Mining Approach Using LinkedIn Data, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5213, 39, 3, (2023).
  • Put Gender on the Tender in Australian Public Projects, World, 10.3390/world3030038, 3, 3, (681-691), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share